Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 5, 2026, 2:51 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eternal the originator of time - proof.
#11
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
(April 11, 2015 at 7:42 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:
(April 11, 2015 at 7:40 pm)Zen Badger Wrote: Prove that your eternal cause(God) is eternal and doesn't itself have a cause.

I already did.

Holy crap, you did????  That's amazing!  Where's your Nobel Prize?
Reply
#12
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
No one wants to address the argument in the opening post it seems.
Reply
#13
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
(April 11, 2015 at 7:54 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: No one wants to address the argument in the opening post it seems.

I have. It is not established that a cause is required
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#14
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
So I'm gonna type this rubbing my temple in a futile attempt at soothing the pulsating vein there. I'm also going to spell it out very clearly and concisely, as this is about the trillionth time I've seen this turd of a statement in a different dress.
Who. Made. The. Creator?
If it exists, it must have come from somewhere. That which has intelligence must also have origin. And please, please don't say he exists outside of time and space, because that absolutely does not address the problem in any way. He must have had a beginning, or a time when he was at a lesser form than that which he is now. Is he perhaps a being from another universe, who has learned the art of making universes? That could go...some small distance towards making the argument even the tiniest bit feasible, astounding logical leaps needed aside.
Where did this hypothetical creator come from? C'mon, let's hash this out, on this day, on this forum, once and for all.
[Image: rySLj1k.png]

If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Reply
#15
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
(April 11, 2015 at 7:57 pm)Alex K Wrote: I have. It is not established that a cause is required

That's attacking the conclusion, not the argument. Try again.
Reply
#16
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
(April 11, 2015 at 8:03 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:
(April 11, 2015 at 7:57 pm)Alex K Wrote: I have. It is not established that a cause is required

That's attacking the conclusion, not the argument. Try again.

Wasn't "effect needs cause" a premise? If not then what is your argument exactly. It's confusingly written because there are several paragraphs and I don't understand how they relate
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#17
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
(April 11, 2015 at 8:19 pm)Alex K Wrote:
(April 11, 2015 at 8:03 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: That's attacking the conclusion, not the argument. Try again.

Wasn't "effect needs cause" a premise? If not then what is your argument exactly. It's confusingly written because there are several paragraphs and I don't understand how they relate
That was one part of the argument. But the conclusion doesn't rely on it. Because there is two parts to initial part of the argument. One then talks about effect and cause. The other part talks about time and it's limited nature.  Then the conclusions follow from there. (ie. the first point of time came into being, ie time came into being).

So you are saying effects don't require a cause?
Reply
#18
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
I think quantum mechanics heavily blurs the line between effects and causes, wouldn't you say so Alex? (Psst, agree with me!)
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#19
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
What you have done is said "Existence represents an infinite regression, which is paradoxical. Therefore, we need a philosophical quantity, X, which solves this paradox."

The problem is that you insist X must be separate from whatever exists. However, there is now a new system: "whatever exists + X," and you anyway need to explain how this new system originated. You will need an infinite regression of Gods.

There is a debating term that exactly defines what you are doing: special pleading. This is your argument: "Everything must be created, so it must all have been created by something which does not need to be created." So your first thesis: "everything must be created" is falsified, since you are allowing (asserting, actually) that at least one thing doesn't need to be created, and so you NO LONGER NEED to invent a new entity. You can just say, for example, "Every cause needs in turn another cause. Therefore the universe must have existed forever." No new quantity X required.
Reply
#20
RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
(April 11, 2015 at 8:23 pm)robvalue Wrote: I think quantum mechanics heavily blurs the line between effects and causes, wouldn't you say so Alex? (Psst, agree with me!)

Even if I were to concede for the sake of argument, than on smaller scale, effects occur without a cause (instead of saying these causes are yet unknown by science), still the over all effects in endless universe, all requires a cause, therefore the argument can be modified and seen in this light, and it would show the universe is not of infinite chain of cause and effects still.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 14931 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  [Serious] Criticism of Aquinas' First Way or of the Proof of God from Motion. spirit-salamander 75 19814 May 3, 2021 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Eternal Return viocjit 16 4050 September 22, 2020 at 9:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  A 'proof' of God's existence - free will mrj 54 16765 August 9, 2020 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Sal
  Proof that I'm immortal Shantideva 64 14613 September 11, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  An easy proof that rational numbers are countable. Jehanne 7 4048 February 22, 2018 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Who Has the Burden of Proof? Rhondazvous 10 5427 October 26, 2015 at 10:49 pm
Last Post: jenny1972
  Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist Rational AKD 348 142426 October 22, 2015 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
Exclamation Proof For The Materialization Of Dream Objects Into Reality A Lucid Dreaming Atheist 15 6777 August 19, 2015 at 1:44 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Proof of God Harris 257 103789 May 21, 2015 at 8:24 pm
Last Post: IATIA



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)