Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 10, 2025, 11:13 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
Pyrrho: interesting, thanks!

So let me get this straight... all that Christians have to show us for evidence is the bible. And Albert here is saying it's just a ridiculous story? Wow. OK, well I'm impressed you found a "Christian mythicist" (or the closest you'll get to one I guess) and I've yet more appreciation for the marvels of cognitive dissidence and just plain making shit up. It does act as a counter example to my blanket statement, so I was wrong Smile
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
(June 25, 2015 at 10:54 am)Stimbo Wrote: So we have an angel named Moroni and a planet named Kolob (Bolok in reverse). You don't even need the magic underwear at this point. Smith must have been laughing all the way to the bank.

You're sure the planet wasn't named Skcollob? Would have made more sense reading it in reverse. Especially since Moroni alludes to a little Moron.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
Yeah, I don't know why Min keeps holding to his position. The evidence shows that Jesus existed. He wasn't some mythical god like Zeus. The New Testament writers had their own opinions of him, and for sure that's fallible. But doesn't mean that he didn't exist in the first place.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
(June 26, 2015 at 2:26 am)robvalue Wrote: Pyrrho: interesting, thanks!

So let me get this straight... all that Christians have to show us for evidence is the bible. And Albert here is saying it's just a ridiculous story? Wow. OK, well I'm impressed you found a "Christian mythicist" (or the closest you'll get to one I guess) and I've yet more appreciation for the marvels of cognitive dissidence and just plain making shit up. It does act as a counter example to my blanket statement, so I was wrong Smile

Albert Schweitzer was not a mythicist... lol... he believed Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher, the dominant view held by secular scholarship.

Wait, Pyrrho and the others who liked the quote thought that the man who launched the "First Quest" for the historical Jesus was a mythicist? (And that the HJ is irrelevant? Lol?). The man who said that, in Bart Ehrman's paraphrase, "the problem with the historical Jesus is that he was far too historical."

Fuckin' Christ people . . . The desperation is getting depressing.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
Desperation? What's the problem, we're just having some polite conversation.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
Guys. guys. It's irrelevant. Please don't get worked up over something like this ._.
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
I'm cool and froody Smile

Yeah, it sure is irrelevant. I just enjoy checking it out.

I don't know why people would get all bent out of shape about it. It's just a very old dead guy.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
(June 26, 2015 at 10:53 am)Nestor Wrote: Albert Schweitzer was not a mythicist...

Correct. But he did not think the historical Jesus mattered. At least, that is what he wrote.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
Oh, jesus doesn't matter in any case.

But there remains no evidence of his existence beyond the wishful thinking of early propagandists.
Reply
RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
(June 26, 2015 at 11:37 am)Pyrrho Wrote:
(June 26, 2015 at 10:53 am)Nestor Wrote: Albert Schweitzer was not a mythicist...

Correct. But he did not think the historical Jesus mattered. At least, that is what he wrote.
He didn't think the historical Jesus was relevant to modern Christian theology. And I would agree. Which is why, Rob, the attempts of mythicists to paint any historical quest as propagandistic, wishful, and religious in nature is desperate, dishonest, and irrational, to say nothing of politeness.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church. Nishant Xavier 36 2687 August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Atheists, if God doesnt exist, then explain why Keanu Reeves looks like Jesus Christ Frakki 9 1657 April 1, 2023 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  Why is Jesus Circumcised and not the rest of the christians ? Megabullshit 23 6194 February 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  [Not Even A Little Bit Serious] Why AREN'T You An Atheist? BrianSoddingBoru4 28 5011 December 28, 2019 at 12:48 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Most humans aren't too logical when it comes to world views and how to go about it. Mystic 28 4968 October 9, 2018 at 8:59 am
Last Post: Alan V
  Why can't Christians Verify Exactly Where Jesus Was Buried? Firefighter01 278 64594 January 19, 2017 at 8:19 am
Last Post: Little Rik
  Why can't Christians Verify Exactly Where Jesus Was Buried? Firefighter01 0 543 August 31, 2016 at 3:19 am
Last Post: Firefighter01
Video The Reasons why "Just Following Jesus" Doesn't work Mental Outlaw 1346 281894 July 2, 2016 at 2:58 pm
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  Aren't Science vs. Creation Debates......rather pointless? maestroanth 30 6721 March 29, 2016 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Dawkins explains why he wont debate William Lane Craig Justtristo 45 12345 June 29, 2015 at 3:00 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)