Two possibilities...

[Wyrd of Gawd]

Then there is the third option which is the truth. The Hebrew god Yahweh is a stolen name from the Canaanite polytheism from which the Hebrews splintered from.

There's a ton of god characters in the Bible but they were all just men.  That's why they have so much dialogue and long conversations.

[Minimalist]

Poor drippy.  He has this whole fantasy of who wrote his fucking bullshit bible while scholars, including xtian scholars, cheerfully admit that this crap was just anonymous second century scribblings.  Poor drippy.  He's all alone against people who know what the fuck they are talking about.  Sucks to be him.

[Angrboda]

Does that mean this is not the history of the christian religion? No. The difference being Christianity is defined by Christ. the christian Religion is defined by man. Being a member of the religion does not in no way make you a Christian by the standard of Christ. How can one say that? Because again, Unlike the no true scots man fallacy their are rules that define a Christian by the standards of Christ in the bible. If one does not follow said rules we are told Christ will not acknoweledge them as 'Christian.'

Citation needed.

[Crossless2.0]

Does that mean this is not the history of the christian religion? No. The difference being Christianity is defined by Christ. the christian Religion is defined by man. Being a member of the religion does not in no way make you a Christian by the standard of Christ. How can one say that? Because again, Unlike the no true scots man fallacy their are rules that define a Christian by the standards of Christ in the bible. If one does not follow said rules we are told Christ will not acknoweledge them as 'Christian.'

Citation needed.

Allow me to help:

The Gospel According to Drich (4:20): And Jesus said, "Whosoever reads the Word of God and comes to a different conclusion as to its meaning than my beloved disciple, Drich, the slob on whom I will found my mob, is neither a follower of me nor yet a Scotsman, but will be chewed up and spit out on the dung heap, as he is truly worthy of damnation."

[Drich]

[Drich]

[Drich]

Sorry Randy did not know you were a brother.

Next time if you take issue with anything I say, then take it to me first/Pm me. (or not I have no issue hashing it out in public, I just think it is better to try and follow what the bible says about Christian conflict rather than brother against brother in the heathen arena) (for you stims)

That said, just because I don't believe Peter was the first pope, nor do I believe the current one has the same apostolic authority or power Peter did, makes you any more or less saved than you are.
Why? Because as the above post points out, I believe 'we' (NONE OF US NOT EVEN PETER) gets to say who is and who is not a member of the church. I believe Jesus is not a respector of the boundries we put on our religions. I also believe that brother "A" can live a perfect Christian life, and brother "B" can live an identical one and brother 'A' goes to Heaven while brother 'b' goes to Hell. Why? Because it is not about what we do persay. It's about why we do it. Meaning our religions don't save any of us. our relationship with Jesus Christ does. Remember He told us NO Man comes unto the Father but by Him.. Not 'no man comes unto the father but by this religion or that one..' That mean it is Jesus who will decide who is and is not in the church and not us or our father's empty traditions.

[KUSA]

Sorry Randy did not know you were a brother.

Next time if you take issue with anything I say, then take it to me first/Pm me. (or not I have no issue hashing it out in public, I just think it is better to try and follow what the bible says about Christian conflict rather than brother against brother in the heathen arena) (for you stims)

What you can't recognize a fellow christard?

The fact is, no two christards believe the same thing. Jesus tells different lies to everyone.

[ApeNotKillApe]

Sorry Randy did not know you were a brother.

What does the colour of his skin have to do with it? 


  

Couldn't resist, sorry.

[TheRocketSurgeon]

Sorry Randy did not know you were a brother.

Next time if you take issue with anything I say, then take it to me first/Pm me. (or not I have no issue hashing it out in public, I just think it is better to try and follow what the bible says about Christian conflict rather than brother against brother in the heathen arena) (for you stims)

What you can't recognize a fellow christard?

The fact is, no two christards believe the same thing. Jesus tells different lies to everyone.

No need to insult them, KUSA, not in this case. But I did "prophesy" this exact "dust-up", just a page back.

I'm more concerned with the fact that the cultists can't see that they don't ever ever again get to tell us that we have to treat them with respect, when they are now admittedly under orders not to even let us see that they don't have a united front on doctrine.

New doctrine: "Lie to atheists. It's okay. God hates them."

Brother against brother. Psh.

Wow, Drich. Way to spell out why all the Catholics are frauds. Rather than answering your nonsense (like completely missing my point about picking and choosing focus  doctrine, re: divorce v. gayness), I'll just let the Catholics here tear you up on that one.