Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 12:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Here's why Creatards might be right
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
I may be someone unique unto myself, then.

I daily have the free will choice of deciding between one thing or another.

I can say what I want, or I can keep my mouth quiet while continuing to listen to the conversation around me.

I can choose between eating either one or another, or nothing, for lunch.

I can choose to respond to a forum thread or not respond to it.

My mind clearly weighs upon one choice over another, that cannot be discounted.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
Whether we have choices is not what is being questioned here....

This isn't about fatalism. Yes you can choose, we all can, we all have choices.

Are they free choices? Nope.
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
To state that my subconscious knows what choice I am going to make between two or more options seems rather more supernatural than anything religion has concocted.

Why would I be weighing over multiple options, assessing them?
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
If free will is free decision making without any axioms then only a being capable not of critical thinking can have free will. Humans make decisions using critical thinking,i.e,makes decisions using axioms, which means that our decisions are dependent on axioms and are not free and according to your definition we hence do not exhibit the ability of free will.

But isn't that like saying that the water that is filled inside a bucket cannot flow freely because the water is restricted to the boundaries of the bucket?
Jew dig?
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
(October 31, 2015 at 12:51 am)Kitan Wrote: To state that my subconscious knows what choice I am going to make between two or more options seems rather more supernatural than anything religion has concocted.  

Why would I be weighing over multiple options, accessing them?

Ummm... many neuroscience has confirmed this... so unless you are anti-science and anti naturalilistic philosophy why deny those experiments? It's the very opposite of supernatural, it's science. Science deals with naturalism not supernaturalism.

If you don't weigh mulitiple options that just makes it even more clear that thoughts are merely popping into your head and you're not free... and it is merely an illusion of an illusion of free will to mistake the weighing them up for anything more than... just weighing them up. No free will required.

Bed time for me now GN.
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
Free will is real.

I can understand from whence the confusion is arising.

It is akin to the theist who cannot understand the difference between a theory and a scientific theory.

Imagine free will without the religious baggage, and it is quite real.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
(October 31, 2015 at 12:55 am)Kitan Wrote: Free will is real.

I can understand from whence the confusion is arising.

It is akin to the theist who cannot understand the difference between a theory and a scientific theory.  

Imagine free will without the religious baggage, and it is quite real.

Lalala Lalala Lalala
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
hehe, that does seem to be the case.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
Here ya go Jen. This will shut the heathens up!

No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
(October 30, 2015 at 11:24 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: there is no solid evidence for or against intelligent design...

That depends upon if you mean intelligent design (some nebulous concept or evolutionary creationism) or Intelligent Design. The first is an unnecessary complication, the second is completely, totally, unequivocally wrong.

(October 30, 2015 at 11:24 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: or God

The "reality" of God is created through repetition and ritual. The concept of God existing outside the self is absurd, limiting, and dangerous.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Lightbulb Here is why you should believe in God. R00tKiT 112 17063 April 11, 2020 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Here’s Why You SHOULDN’T Believe In God BrianSoddingBoru4 46 5837 April 5, 2020 at 8:03 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Skeptics might be jumping to conclusions Transcended Dimensions 357 65793 April 27, 2018 at 7:14 am
Last Post: polymath257
  Why am I here? Mystic 51 12241 April 3, 2018 at 8:05 am
Last Post: Mystic
  A Question of Dropped Pennies: How Might an Atheist Respond? Rhondazvous 33 10121 July 5, 2017 at 4:30 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  2014 article in online science journal: "Atheists Might Not Exist" Whateverist 15 4488 July 4, 2016 at 9:06 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Are the far right Christians here in the U.S. just upset they're losing power GoHalos1993 52 8965 June 9, 2016 at 3:42 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Why I hate Right Wing Christians bussta33 31 7110 April 16, 2016 at 5:28 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  You might be an Atheist... The Reality Salesman01 14 4101 November 15, 2013 at 6:23 pm
Last Post: Bob Kelso
  Why, Why,Why! Lemonvariable72 14 4014 October 2, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)