Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 3:56 pm
Thread Rating:
Biblical Incest
|
(July 18, 2016 at 5:48 pm)Spirian Wrote: I have a certain first cousin with rather large ( o Y o ) that I wouldn't mind having a go at. Crack on... Send pics. Of her. (July 18, 2016 at 5:50 pm)The Viking Wrote:(July 18, 2016 at 5:48 pm)Spirian Wrote: I have a certain first cousin with rather large ( o Y o ) that I wouldn't mind having a go at. I think she knows me better than to allow me to photograph her After all, we are related Just think... (July 18, 2016 at 5:54 pm)Spirian Wrote:(July 18, 2016 at 5:50 pm)The Viking Wrote: Crack on... Oh...I'm thinking. Thinking really hard. I mean... Er....
I wonder how funny it would be if a picture of your sister was posted.
LOL. Not likely.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Hot cousin.
(July 18, 2016 at 11:32 am)Stimbo Wrote:(July 18, 2016 at 8:48 am)Drich Wrote: So... Are you looking for permission to date your mom? how is general speculation considered an attack? If the OP is looking into the moral/legality of incest then is not the conclusion of the op seeking or at the very least testing the waters for an incestual relationship not a reasonable TOPICAL conclusion? As such then how can this be considered an 'ad hoc attack?
You ignored the point of the OP and went straight to a personal derogation of the poster's character. That's a textbook ad hom, which you would be complaining about until the cows come home if anyone else had done the same to you. You could, for example, have made your general speculation in a general way - id est, non-specific. That's kind of the point about general speculations.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(July 17, 2016 at 7:14 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Why do you think the USA has no problem cousin marriage but apparently has a big problem with gay marriage? Actually before you make that claim, learn something. Some states require a blood test. First cousins cannot marry one another and the federal government put it's proverbial foot down about gay marriage. It's been legal in the US for some time now. Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)