Prayer is like changing your facebook profile picture to something in order to fight child abuse or terrorism. It's a way of people feeling good about themselves while doing absolutely nothing.
|
The problem with prayer.
|
|
Prayer is like changing your facebook profile picture to something in order to fight child abuse or terrorism. It's a way of people feeling good about themselves while doing absolutely nothing.
I think holding a positive attitude is what matters most. Take life in stride and you'll have less "requests" of "god".
(July 20, 2016 at 1:09 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(July 20, 2016 at 11:51 am)robvalue Wrote: To clarify: to say something is supernatural, by your definition, is to claim it will never be explained. [with by natural causes]-my edit- All scientific theories are models. They are also examples of reduction. Explaining one thing in terms of smaller bits. At some level we are bound to come to a description of reality which can't be reduced. But we can never know definitively whether or not we are at the final reduction. What irreducible natural process that skeptics never seem to consider are you referring to? I'm wary of the fact that you say it can be deduced but not observed. The same could be said for phlogiston and the aether. ![]() (July 20, 2016 at 10:59 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: [edit] Rorschach?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: The problem with prayer.
July 20, 2016 at 2:14 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2016 at 2:16 pm by robvalue.)
(July 20, 2016 at 1:34 pm)PETE_ROSE Wrote: Rob, lets not delve into a deep debate on this, but in short, what would you say set the universe in motion? The first cause I believe it is called? I don't know if anything set it in motion. We don't know if there was ever a "time" our universe/reality wasn't here. Science is unable to investigate, and philosophical arguments can't delve further. If something set our reality (not the universe, that's a contradiction in terms) in motion, then I have no idea what it would be. Maybe nothing did.
It sure as hell wasn't fucking yhwh the bloody-handed!
(July 20, 2016 at 1:58 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Rorschach? I'll go from left to right...
(July 20, 2016 at 1:34 pm)PETE_ROSE Wrote: Rob, lets not delve into a deep debate on this, but in short, what would you say set the universe in motion? The first cause I believe it is called? The correct answer is, "we don't know". It is not "God did it". Unless, of course, you are able to provide demonstrable and falsifiable evidence, and valid and sound logic to support that claim. You are engaging in classic "argument from ignorance". Just because the answer is not yet known, does not mean your answer becomes correct by default. You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. (July 20, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Spirian Wrote:(July 20, 2016 at 1:58 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Rorschach? I especially like "Two large breasted Marge Simpsons with angel wings fighting over a purse while Hello Kitty refs"! That's pretty much what it looks like. You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|