Left-wing extremists terrorise customers at London restaurant

[account_inactive]

Is anyone else questioning why the fuck these people took their anger out on... le restaurant... for getting raided?

I mean surely the anger should be towards the police? All the restaurant did was hire immigrants and get busted for having illegals. Why the anger towards them if you're so pro-immigrant?

Because they are fucking idiots. Deport the illegals and give those involved in the incident a heavy fine.

[Banjo]

When I hear "Malcolm X movement", I wonder if we're thinking the same thing???

[account_inactive]

When I hear "Malcolm X movement", I wonder if we're thinking the same thing???

Yeah, we've got a movement named after him in the UK.

Just your average libtard types, really.

[abaris]

Of course I also think that Islamic terrorism is right-wing terrorism to a certain degree.

Now it is. 40, 30 years ago, it was left-wing. They were in league with the European extreme left terrorist groups and in many cases sponsored by the soviet block. Religion back then was mainly window dressing. One of the most glaring examples was the hijacking of the Landshut back in '77. I was still a child back then, but looking back, the differences between now and then are obvious. Most obvious in the nature of the actual attacks, which weren't aimed at killing as many as possible at the cost of one's own life, but to blackmail opposing parties to do one's bidding. It was that way with Munich 1972 and it stayed that way all through the 70ies and early 80ies.

The turn to religiously motivated terror started with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the ensuing sponsoring of religious extremists by the West. I was too young back then to look beyond the media coverage of the galant freedom fighters against the big red dog. But this was actually the start of what we observe now. Well funded and well trained religious extremists ready to take their message out into the world. What many forget is that Afghanistan was an international conflict with fighters from all regions of the middle East flocking to take part.

Real left wing terrorism? I would be hard pressed to name even one instance where it still exists. The extreme left these days is made up of small splinters of sad losers throwing rocks at some demo or doing property damage. The right on the other hand, and you're absolutely right in counting Islamists among them, is very much alive an kicking.

The recent attack in Munich has pretty much dissapeared from the headlines, but it turns out that the attacker was not only proud of sharing his birthday with Hitler, the attack was also aimed at immigrants. And so the anniversary of the Brejvik attack isn't a coincidence at all, since that guy was studying previous attacks by his brethren in spirit.

[Banjo]

When I hear "Malcolm X movement", I wonder if we're thinking the same thing???

Yeah, we've got a movement named after him in the UK.

Just your average libtard types, really.

I think the movement is a bit different.

[account_inactive]

Yeah, we've got a movement named after him in the UK.

Just your average libtard types, really.

I think the movement is a bit different.

I'm talking about our version.

Anyway, fuck them both.

[Banjo]

I think the movement is a bit different.

I'm talking about our version.

Anyway, fuck them both.

I was thinking bowel movement.

Mind in the gutter and all that.

[Thumpalumpacus]

I think the movement is a bit different.

I'm talking about our version.

Anyway, fuck them both.

The Autobiography of Malcolm X is a good read, you should check it out.

[Faith No More]

and who exactly did those guys terrorize or commit violence against? Oh yeah, no one. Throwing bugs in soup is more then any of them did. But for the record, neither of them are terrorists. I'd be extremely cautious about expanding the definition of terrorism beyond a very very strict definition. Especially considering that both presidential candidates want to shut down 'terrorist speech' and websites. Also calling it a federal building is only correct in a technical sense. It was an uninhabited station in the middle of nowhere. I'm more concerned about crickets in my soup then those guys. Which is to say, not at all.

Um...they threatened to fight to the death if the government tried to remove them. You're making it sound as if this was some kind of peaceful protest when they openly declared they were perfectly willing to use violence as a means. You're giving them a pass for not killing anyone, but the only reason they didn't was because the government didn't escalate the situation and got the best of them.

Besides, the definition of "terrorism" is as such...

ter·ror·ism
[ ter- uh-riz- uhm]
NOUN
1.
the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

So, these people's actions fall squarely in the definition of terrorism, and by trying to minimize those actions, you're coming dangerously close to historical revisionism.

[CapnAwesome]

Is anyone else questioning why the fuck these people took their anger out on... le restaurant... for getting raided?

I mean surely the anger should be towards the police? All the restaurant did was hire immigrants and get busted for having illegals. Why the anger towards them if you're so pro-immigrant?

Yeah, that was my first thought. Why take it out on the restaurant? Then again I doubt that they really are that rational of people.