I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?

[Primordial Bisque]

[Ravenshire]

What do you think about my proof for the existence of God?

You can't logic gawd into existence.

BTW - #4 is a HUGE non-sequitur.

[Thumpalumpacus]

[Ravenshire]

Thanks everyone for your presence and participation.
 
If I may, let us first get connected with the concept of God, for if we don't have the same concept of God, then we will be acting irrationally talking about whether He exists or not, when we are not having the same thing in our minds - that is talking past each other's head, which is an irrational behavior by us all.
 
And also if I may, let us just concentrate on one God, even though there are thinkers who propose that there be many gods, etc.
 
Please therefore everyone here, I suggest that you choose one god to work on, and propose your concept of the god you are presenting to prove the existence or non-existence of this god.
 
 
You see, we have got to work on one god at a time, and we have got to work as to concur on the concept of god we are talking about to prove that he exists at all or not, in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind.
 
 
Here is my concept of God, of course you can use the word god instead of God, for your one god that you choose to work on, as to come to his existence or non-existence.
 
Here is again my concept of God, and please bear in mind that it is the information of the concept of God from me, it is not any proof at all by proposing the concept of God; for without any information about something at all, i.e. the concept, we would be acting irrationally talking about its existence or non-existence, as we will be as I said talking past each other’s head, on different things.
 
Here is again, please bear with me, my information on the concept of God.
 

• God in concept is first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

 
 
So, dear colleagues here, please present your information on the concept of the god, just choose one of the many Gods, gods, goddesses, deities, divinities, etc., that you know about; for in this way we will be connected in regard to what we are talking about, as to prove that it exists or it does not exist.

You seem to be here simply to convert us nasty heathens. That won't go over well.

[Ravenshire]

just into denying gods exist but without any ado about how they get to their conclusion.

Well. Yet another one who knows fuck-all about what atheism really is.

Color me un-surprised.

[Ravenshire]

Asmodee says" "So why don't we keep it simple?  Tell me to which god you are referring?  Where is this god defined?  Is it just a definition you came up with yourself?"


I have said this nth times here in this thread, "My concept of God is that in concept God is first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning."

That's not a description of a gawd. That's a description of it's job.

[Pat Mustard]

What do you think about my proof for the existence of God?

You can't logic gawd into existence.

BTW - #4 is a HUGE non-sequitur.

He's not even trying that. He's looking to nonsense god into existence.

[I_am_not_mafia]

[robvalue]

I love it when people make sweeping statements like that.

"Time must have had a beginning."

"Something can't come out of nothing."

"Everything has a cause."

"You can't have infinite regression."

My intuition/observation makes me think that... =/= It is a fact that...

This is why we do science. It's why we don't start with assumptions we want to establish. We make as few assumptions as possible in order for the science to function. I really don't care what random person X states to be universally true. Come back when you have some sort of results to show for it, or when it has any relevance to anything. If you think you can "prove" something fundamental about reality without getting out of bed, chances are you're just wasting everyone's time.

[Mariosep]