|
I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
|
 RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 18, 2016 at 5:15 pm
(November 18, 2016 at 5:14 pm)Asmodee Wrote: That's an easy one. You want me to believe that magic is real, so, SHOW...ME...MAGIC! *Shows you stage magic*
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
 RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 2:32 pm
 RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 2:50 pm
(November 19, 2016 at 2:32 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear Pocaracas, you have not given me the link. And please no cussing (see below, ANNEX 1, his post, for dear readers your orientation). USE YOUR EYES! EITHER THIS PAGE OR LAST PAGE OR THE ONE BEFORE... IT'S NOT THAT HARD! ARE YOU RETARDED?! There, I managed not to cuss.... mostly... (November 19, 2016 at 2:32 pm)Mariosep Wrote: That is the trouble with atheists here, they cuss all the time, and how can anyone have any productive exchange with them? You see, this is the trouble with theists everywhere. They refuse to see things that are right in front of their eyes! Either that, or they suffer from some mental retardation that prevents them from seeing things...  RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 3:23 pm
First cause arguments "prove" that we are mere simulations in the mind of god. I've yet to see any value in simulation hypothesis, and pantheism is fluffy but harmless. Being a simulation in the mind of god I am essentially god, and I don't appreciate you talking to my fellow atheists like that.
 RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 3:40 pm
(November 19, 2016 at 3:23 pm)houseofcantor Wrote: First cause arguments "prove" that we are mere simulations in the mind of god. I've yet to see any value in simulation hypothesis, and pantheism is fluffy but harmless. Being a simulation in the mind of god I am essentially god, and I don't appreciate you talking to my fellow atheists like that. If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then from where do you get your morals? RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 4:09 pm
(November 19, 2016 at 3:40 pm)The Joker Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 3:23 pm)houseofcantor Wrote: First cause arguments "prove" that we are mere simulations in the mind of god. I've yet to see any value in simulation hypothesis, and pantheism is fluffy but harmless. Being a simulation in the mind of god I am essentially god, and I don't appreciate you talking to my fellow atheists like that. evolution tao empathy simulation education and chemical receptors RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 4:19 pm
(November 19, 2016 at 4:09 pm)houseofcantor Wrote:(November 19, 2016 at 3:40 pm)The Joker Wrote: If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then from where do you get your morals? Evolution, Really? While some molecules do combine to form larger structures such as amino acids, it has been shown that this always results in a mixture of left- and right-handed amino acids that is not used in life. Since this is true, is there some other explanation for how the molecules useful for life might have formed? RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 4:49 pm
 RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 19, 2016 at 7:21 pm
(November 18, 2016 at 1:56 am)Mariosep Wrote: So, let us all now focus our attention on the four causes which I from stock knowledge know about: That's your problem, right there.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
