Dinosaur tail found preserved in amber!

[Amarok]

I went to the website. Did not read the articles in question, but I clicked on the link 'What Is Intelligent Design?'   I got as far as, ' intelligent design is a scientific research program...'  Then I threw up on my phone.

Boru

Of course.... I wouldn't expect the anti-intelligence crowd to read the article or respond to the points made.   This was posted for others

Wow intelligent rational people won't waste on ID's non points and anti science bunkum what a shocker

---

Of course.... I wouldn't expect the anti-intelligence crowd to read the article or respond to the points made.   This was posted for others

Yes, posted for other fellow unevolved, gullible, wishthinking, shit hurling, Bible up the ass, monkeys.

summed up really

[Faith No More]

Just for once I'd like to see one of these evolution deniers to put their money where their mouth is. Science is essentially a process, and they're cherry picking a few conclusions they don't like while reaping the benefits of 99.9% of the rest. You don't like that science says humans descended from apes? Fine. No one is saying you have to accept it. But stop pretending like you're not a total hypocrite for using modern amenities like computers, cellphones, prescription drugs et al.

If you don't want to accept evolution, the age of the earth or climate change, you should be living a life just like people did in the 1500's.

[Amarok]

Just for once I'd like to see one of these evolution deniers to put their money where their mouth is.  Science is essentially a process, and they're cherry picking a few conclusions they don't like while reaping the benefits of 99.9% of the rest.  You don't like that science says humans descended from apes?  Fine.  No one is saying you have to accept it.  But stop pretending like you're not a total hypocrite for using modern amenities like computers, cellphones, prescription drugs et al.

If you don't want to accept evolution, the age of the earth or climate change, you should be living a life just like people did in the 1500's.

Oh no the creationtards will just those are "proper science " while evolution is "historic science" which is just there lame attempt to dived science into neat little jars they can pick and choose from HYPOCRITES

Or another common derp tactic is to try and credit business with those inventions as if you need a lab coat to do science. or deny that engineering uses science

Or they will even try and point to creationist who invented things as if there personal believes had anything to do with there inventing

Ultimately though these are just an excuse to resolve there cognitive dissidence

[Doubting Thomas]

This is probably where the creationists think that bird's tail came from:  





The boss called the end of the work day one too many times.

[RoadRunner79]

Just for once I'd like to see one of these evolution deniers to put their money where their mouth is. Science is essentially a process, and they're cherry picking a few conclusions they don't like while reaping the benefits of 99.9% of the rest. You don't like that science says humans descended from apes? Fine. No one is saying you have to accept it. But stop pretending like you're not a total hypocrite for using modern amenities like computers, cellphones, prescription drugs et al.

If you don't want to accept evolution, the age of the earth or climate change, you should be living a life just like people did in the 1500's.

I don't understand where this comes from. I agree that Science is about method; it is not an entity. I don't think that I said anything to be construed as being against science; if I did, then please point it out, perhaps I can clarify a misunderstanding. I just posted some articles which gave more information.

I think that this is based more on an unjustified and incorrect assumption.

[Anomalocaris]

Believing the Bible, or Christ, is against science.

[Jesster]

... and then you whined when people didn't take your article seriously.

[Amarok]

Just for once I'd like to see one of these evolution deniers to put their money where their mouth is.  Science is essentially a process, and they're cherry picking a few conclusions they don't like while reaping the benefits of 99.9% of the rest.  You don't like that science says humans descended from apes?  Fine.  No one is saying you have to accept it.  But stop pretending like you're not a total hypocrite for using modern amenities like computers, cellphones, prescription drugs et al.

If you don't want to accept evolution, the age of the earth or climate change, you should be living a life just like people did in the 1500's.

I don't understand where this comes from.   I agree that Science is about method; it is not an entity.  I don't think that I said anything to be construed as being against science; if I did, then please point it out, perhaps I can clarify a misunderstanding. I just posted some articles which gave more information.

I think that this is based  more on an unjustified and incorrect assumption.

you posted ID websites which is creationism by definition which is anti science by definition

[chimp3]

I can't be kind about this. Anyone who takes seriously anything A.I.G. claims is a dumbass.

[Tonus]

AIG, like many apologetics websites, makes clear that if there is a discrepancy between what the Bible says and what we have learned, then the Biblical version is the one they must accept:
https://answersingenesis.org/about/faith/

The 66 books of the Bible are the written Word of God. The Bible is divinely inspired and inerrant throughout. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs. It is the supreme authority in everything it teaches. Its authority is not limited to spiritual, religious, or redemptive themes but includes its assertions in such fields as history and science.

The final guide to the interpretation of Scripture is Scripture itself.

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information.