Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 27, 2026, 1:01 am

Poll: Did you like the film?
This poll is closed.
Yes
5.56%
1 5.56%
No
94.44%
17 94.44%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
#1
Video 
Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
I am a documentary film maker and I believe that modern day accepted version of history is faith based nonsense religion. It is very hard to almost impossible to predict what happened long ago in the past even as late as a few decades ago historical accounts are mostly assumptions and wild guesses. To further illustrate my point I made a documentary about world war II that shows it through an alternative lens yet remains as accurate as any other modern day counter part even though the accounts are radically different. For all we know History played out completely differently then we realize and in all likely hood it did.

>snip<

Moderator Notice
Please read the rules. We do not allow new members to post links to outside content until you have accrued both 30 days of members and 30 posts.
Reply
#2
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
[Image: Napoleon-Bonaparte8.jpg]



However, that does not mean that the facts are false.
Reply
#3
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
(March 14, 2017 at 9:56 pm)trustyoursources Wrote: I am a documentary film maker and I believe that modern day accepted version of history is faith based nonsense religion. It is very hard to almost impossible to predict what happened long ago in the past even as late as a few decades ago historical accounts are mostly assumptions and wild guesses. To further illustrate my point I made a documentary about world war II that shows it through an alternative lens yet remains as accurate as any other modern day counter part even though the accounts are radically different. For all we know History played out completely differently then we realize and in all likely hood it did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHgUVoREOmg

No. Jesus is a faith based religion no. Ore true that literally any account that are radically different.

The fact that we won WWII is evidently more true than an alternative version where goose stepping SS troopers patrol the White House.

Wait, really? Sorry, never mind.
Reply
#4
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
While history as we know it may not be entirely accurate, I wouldn't call it faith-based since we do have data points to piece together to form the story. There's also some guess-work involved for sure, and rational people will turn that into "I don't knows" and "maybes".

I have no idea how this becomes a religion, though. I should hope nobody treats it that way.
Reply
#5
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
I made it about 4 minutes and change before deciding you are a Poe.

Lenin died in 1924.  He was not sitting in Moscow in 1941 waiting for communications from besieged Leningrad!  He most assuredly was not expecting them from Trotsky who Stalin had murdered in Mexico in 1940 and who was thus NOT in command of Soviet Forces in the Leningrad area.  That was Lt. Gen. Popov.

Remember what I said about facts.
Reply
#6
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
(March 14, 2017 at 10:02 pm)Minimalist Wrote: [Image: Napoleon-Bonaparte8.jpg]



However, that does not mean that the facts are false.

How can you post that meme and say that haha

(March 14, 2017 at 10:14 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I made it about 4 minutes and change before deciding you are a Poe.

Lenin died in 1924.  He was not sitting in Moscow in 1941 waiting for communications from besieged Leningrad!  He most assuredly was not expecting them from Trotsky who Stalin had murdered in Mexico in 1940 and who was thus NOT in command of Soviet Forces in the Leningrad area.  That was Lt. Gen. Popov.

Remember what I said about facts.

You really think that these "facts" and dates are right. Come on dude this is all a massive cover up by the global elites. This was decades ago almost no documentation is left for the public to access. Its all lies.

(March 14, 2017 at 10:08 pm)Jesster Wrote: While history as we know it may not be entirely accurate, I wouldn't call it faith-based since we do have data points to piece together to form the story. There's also some guess-work involved for sure, and rational people will turn that into "I don't knows" and "maybes".

I have no idea how this becomes a religion, though. I should hope nobody treats it that way.

No history is just government prapaganda. they control the text books and the documents and relics. They decide what goes in the museums. Nothing is as it seems. I absolutely promise you no matter how ridiculous you might think my film is, its most likely more true then what the official lie is on the matter.
Reply
#7
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
Ah, so you're a conspiracy theorist then. Why didn't you just say so in the first place? That could have saved me some time.
Reply
#8
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
As Barney would say, "he's a nut."

GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#9
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
(March 15, 2017 at 12:20 am)Godschild Wrote: As Barney would say, "he's a nut."

GC

How open minded of you.

(March 15, 2017 at 12:13 am)Jesster Wrote: Ah, so you're a conspiracy theorist then. Why didn't you just say so in the first place? That could have saved me some time.

Sure label me but if I had to choose my own label I would prefer artist or scholar.
Reply
#10
RE: Is the generally accepted version of history a faith based religion?
It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out.

(March 15, 2017 at 12:21 am)trustyoursources Wrote: Sure label me but if I had to choose my own label I would prefer artist or scholar.

I could think of a few more for you, but I've already spent my allowance of insults for today.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What book has the most history? georgecarlin 43 11665 May 13, 2019 at 8:29 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  When does biblical history begin ? possibletarian 59 33263 November 24, 2017 at 1:27 am
Last Post: possibletarian
  Why the Texas shooting is not evil, based on the bible Face2face 56 25728 November 16, 2017 at 7:21 am
Last Post: Little Rik
  Religion hurts homosexuality but homosexuality kills religion? deleteduser12345 43 18021 March 30, 2016 at 2:46 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Terrorism has no religion but religion brings terrorism. Islam is NOT peaceful. bussta33 13 7578 January 16, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why are Christians so ignorant of their religions history and it's crimes GoHalos1993 24 10979 December 7, 2015 at 10:12 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Religion's affect outside of religion Heat 67 30005 September 28, 2015 at 9:45 pm
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
  possible origins of islam (higher criticism scholars/ history nuts welcome) Psychonaut 18 7945 August 6, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Disproving gods with history and science dyresand 10 4693 June 30, 2015 at 1:17 am
Last Post: Salacious B. Crumb
Rainbow Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion" CristW 288 97745 November 21, 2014 at 4:09 pm
Last Post: DramaQueen



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)