|
The Next War in the Middle East
|
 (July 29, 2017 at 6:43 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: The 'next' war in the Middle East implies there would be an interval of non-hostilities between hostilities. That's easy Vorls. If the men are shooting the women, it's war! If the men AND women are stoning the women, it's just Tuesday.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. 
Pat Mustard
Previous username: GUBU God! Theresa, I forgot me fecking trousers!  Religious Views: the Disc's first ligthning proof atheist (July 29, 2017 at 3:36 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Ugh, I don't want there to be more war in the middle east.... Shouldn't have voted for the shit who'd fuck you over for a few brass tacks. Yes, I know he promised to force one of your religious ideologies on everybody else, but is destroying the world a price worth paying for theocracy.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home 
I am sure Kurdistan would be a bastion of liberty, freedom of expression, equality between the sexes. With a free press and open , honest elections. Something Americans consider worth killing and dying for.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
You don't have to worry about ISIS.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-42029-p...pid1226792 ISIS is no more than the U.S inside man. Just another militia that carry on the orders of the pentagon. Since the cold war, America used all the help it needed from Muslim allies (like Saudi Arabia) to unleash these hellish militias (Al-Mujahideen, ISIS, Al-Qaeda). It's more of a superiority in covert ops, you can also see American forces fight publicly next to Shiite gangs like the "Popular Mobilization Forces". It became a pattern: once the U.S sets foot in a Middle Eastern state, black and yellow flags show up to shape the commands of the pentagon into existence. The Kurds were promised a country a long while ago for their services.  RE: The Next War in the Middle East
July 30, 2017 at 11:25 am
(This post was last modified: July 30, 2017 at 11:27 am by Catholic_Lady.)
(July 30, 2017 at 6:36 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:(July 29, 2017 at 3:36 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Ugh, I don't want there to be more war in the middle east.... Um I didn't vote for Trump if that's what you are implying Does anyone know what the status is on Isis? Are they hurting, continuing to grow, losing the war, etc?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh 
I think under 45 we have more to worry about starting a nuclear war over North Korea right now. That fucker has no concept of mutual destruction.
(July 30, 2017 at 11:25 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Losing the war by "media" standards: they lost their capital in both Iraq and Syria. But I expect that the proxy would just find somewhere else to strike.  (July 30, 2017 at 11:25 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(July 30, 2017 at 6:36 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: Shouldn't have voted for the shit who'd fuck you over for a few brass tacks. Yes, I know he promised to force one of your religious ideologies on everybody else, but is destroying the world a price worth paying for theocracy. Their pretensions of forming a state have been crushed. In fact, their greatest victory was the start of their defeat. The problem with capturing cities is that if you fail to hold them then you no longer look like a winner - you look like a loser and they never had any hope of standing up to any modern army with complete air supremacy in a straight up fight. By taking Mosul they screwed themselves although to be fair they didn't take Mosul so much as the Iraqis gave it to them without a fight. The actions of the Iraqi army at Mosul in 2014 were shameful. They ran like rabbits from a force they outnumbered 10-1. You'd think we would learn by now that you can't expect a mercenary army to fight but then again, we never learn. As an actual army, ISIS is finished. They will go back to doing what they do best. Pin prick terror strikes. Expect enough civil strife inside Iraq to give them plenty of targets. RE: The Next War in the Middle East
July 30, 2017 at 12:02 pm
(This post was last modified: July 30, 2017 at 12:07 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
Thanks Min. I'm glad to hear they have not come out of this so well. I guess it's impossible to get rid of all of them completely. There will always be crap going on in the middle east unfortunately.
 I have a theory that Saudi Arabia is going to crash and burn big time as soon as we stop using their oil.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh  RE: The Next War in the Middle East
July 30, 2017 at 12:11 pm
(This post was last modified: July 30, 2017 at 12:12 pm by Astonished.)
I think Hitchens put it best, we'll never stop them until they love death less than we love freedom. Too bad that concept of an afterlife is so pernicious...we have it too, largely, but it doesn't seem to cancel out how well theirs motivates them.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
