RE: Damned Protestants...
February 24, 2011 at 6:01 pm
(October 23, 2010 at 9:30 pm)Spectrum Wrote: More hypocrisy, I'm really not surprised. I am surprised however, during the course of my discussions with know-it-all theists, that they don't seem to question their own religion on the basis of such rampant hypocrisy. They simply wave it off and say "they aren't true christians".
(emphasis mine)
Rampant? Where in that article did it document that child sexual abuse was "rampant" in that or any other church? Or are you simply generalizing on the basis of "experience". I'm jumping in the middle of this, so forgive me if it's already been said, but it is important to avoid the twin fallacies of base rate neglect and representativeness, and thus avoid coming to an exaggerated opinion of the problem. Do preachers abuse at a higher rate than the general public? Should we expect them to be more moral than the average citizen? The way I see it, there are three issues of concern, regardless of the actual rate:
1) discouraging reporting and shielding abusers (primarily the Catholic church; I don't know that anyone has documented similar patterns in other Christian or non-Christian religions).
2) Should we hold the clergy to a higher ethical standard and/or hold religion accountable if they do not meet such standards?
3) I forget what #3 was, but it occurs to me that clergy hold a fiduciary relationship to their laity, so a higher standard than that expected of "the reasonable man" is in order.
4) And again questions of relative rates, and the relationship of these sorts of moral failings to that of other moral failings / hypocrisy, if any. (I'm hesitant to lump child sex abuse in with tax evasion, fraud and mere mortal failings of character).
I'm all for piling on if the situation warrants, but I don't know that one additional criminal constitutes a crime wave.