Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 12:38 am
Thread Rating:
|
Jeff Sessions Rescinding Obama era pot rules
|
(January 7, 2018 at 1:05 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: I'd have far fewer problems with the war on illegal drugs if there were more focus on keeping the really nasty shit out and rehabilitating those caught up in the drug trade and less emphasis put on locking them all up. The war on drugs is an expensive failure. You have tax and regulate and legalize that will solve the drug problem.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>(January 7, 2018 at 1:05 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: I'd have far fewer problems with the war on illegal drugs if there were more focus on keeping the really nasty shit out and rehabilitating those caught up in the drug trade and less emphasis put on locking them all up. Explain please.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: Jeff Sessions Rescinding Obama era pot rules
January 7, 2018 at 1:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2018 at 1:14 pm by dyresand.)
(January 7, 2018 at 9:06 am)dyresand Wrote:(January 7, 2018 at 1:05 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: I'd have far fewer problems with the war on illegal drugs if there were more focus on keeping the really nasty shit out and rehabilitating those caught up in the drug trade and less emphasis put on locking them all up. there fixed it. No amount of cracking down on illegal drugs will solve jack shit. prohibition failed it always fails. the church and south and the government cracked down on alcohol calling it bad because men were being men they drank alcohol a lot. This is just very basic spark notes so you had females and the church along with government ban it. In the south, there is a thing called moonshine if you make it the wrong way it will kill you and or make you blind. So you had a lot of bootleggers selling the stuff and when prohibition ended it solved the problem just let people drink And here is how i feel about it if you want to do drugs you should be able to just not out in the public with a crack pipe all i am saying is it should be legal and it should be treated like public intoxication instead of being thrown into jail for years. Taxation of illegal drugs and regulations will get rid of the dangerous stuff we should be happy krokodil isn't a problem here in the U.S. yet.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>(January 7, 2018 at 11:52 am)mh.brewer Wrote:(January 7, 2018 at 1:05 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: I'd have far fewer problems with the war on illegal drugs if there were more focus on keeping the really nasty shit out and rehabilitating those caught up in the drug trade and less emphasis put on locking them all up. The feds spend way more money on technologies to keep out drugs than they do on technologies to keep out nukes. Last i heard it was on the order of 100:1
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
(January 7, 2018 at 3:03 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(January 7, 2018 at 11:52 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Explain please. OK, thanks. I was on a completely different path. So you're talking about "keeping out" terrorist nukes?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
(January 7, 2018 at 4:27 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(January 7, 2018 at 3:03 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: The feds spend way more money on technologies to keep out drugs than they do on technologies to keep out nukes. Last i heard it was on the order of 100:1 Yep. Imagine the carnage if a terrorist nuke found it's way onto a boat headed into Los Angeles harbor. Or New York, or New Orleans, or... While it may not be an eminent threat, it is certainly a viable threat and the feds spend a pittance on it compared to "securing" the borders against drugs.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
(January 7, 2018 at 7:19 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(January 7, 2018 at 4:27 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: OK, thanks. I was on a completely different path. Drugs are the least of our worries in this country
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



