Why are Christians so full of hate?

[Alan V]

The idea that humans are "killing babies" by aborting zygotes is primarily a religious one, because of the soul theory.

And by the way, "killing babies" is hate-talk.

I find that taking a child life is a wrong....

Sorry, but you can't assume you are right to prove you are right.

[adey67]

Ha Ha Ha, nope, I don't think I'll put you on ignore you're too fucking amusing, anyone who needs to invoke how long they have been here and how many posts they have made in comparison to me and who gets so butt hurt by a newbie sniffing them out is actually clearly seriously bothered by what I said and if I was so insignificant then why even bother responding oh prideful one ? BTW its lose not loose, if you're gonna go head to head with others spelling is important, its my experience that the more angry a person gets and the more disturbed they feel then the more likely they are to make typos and spelling mistakes. Truth is you do not like being contradicted you cannot abide the thought of a world without a magical deity and you cannot stand that perhaps there are people who don't believe there is a god, their disbelief offends you and makes you feel insecure and the anger boils up.
I thank you though, I'm learning so much from you, as in what not to do or how not to be, thanks so much for that I really appreciate it.

So that's all you got? You whole methodology of my destruction is pointing out how you think my butt feels and spelling and grammar errors... I notice you never mentioned content.. wonder why. Oh, that's right, because that is a thinking man's approach and you already demonstrated that you want others to do your thinking for you IE: declaring who I was based on how the butts of your peers feel after years of failing to silence me. Noice nuub.. The reason I mention your limited time here is because there has been no interaction between us in your first 30 post and you have the wherewithal to speak of me from first person perspective, which again you do not have. This again is evidence displaying that you allow others to develop opinions for you, which is also why your declaration above is limited to 'grading papers for spelling and punctuation errors.' (you do not seem to be smart enough to address topical points.) Only ad hom fire from the side lines. I do not foresee you role here (judging by your current involvement) to be much more than a waldorf/mortimore puppet/sock of some other douche who doesn't want their name tarnished by me by attacking me head on.. rather use you to test out different attacks. 

I look forward to putting you back in check each and every time you feel the need to parrot back one of your peers thoughts about me.

Wow, perhaps the most evil unkind and dishonest individual I have ever encountered on any forum anywhere ever, you don't love Jesus, you just hate anyone disagreeing with you so you have to accuse them of being a sheep and just going with the crowd and belittle their ability to think for themselves, news for you is there are now plenty of people here who know who I am and know I'm a good person and capable of independent thought and opinion, shame on you for stooping so low to win on an argument. Your sense of entitlement and demand to be respected while shitting all over others is incredible you dirty arrogant bastard. If Jesus was real and genuine he would kick your lame ass for your comments and for dishonouring his name, truth is you are an unkind uncompassionate dirty bigot who is so prideful he's lost any kindness and humility that his professed religion ever claimed. Have a nice day.

[Drich]

So that's all you got? You whole methodology of my destruction is pointing out how you think my butt feels and spelling and grammar errors... I notice you never mentioned content.. wonder why. Oh, that's right, because that is a thinking man's approach and you already demonstrated that you want others to do your thinking for you IE: declaring who I was based on how the butts of your peers feel after years of failing to silence me. Noice nuub.. The reason I mention your limited time here is because there has been no interaction between us in your first 30 post and you have the wherewithal to speak of me from first person perspective, which again you do not have. This again is evidence displaying that you allow others to develop opinions for you, which is also why your declaration above is limited to 'grading papers for spelling and punctuation errors.' (you do not seem to be smart enough to address topical points.) Only ad hom fire from the side lines. I do not foresee you role here (judging by your current involvement) to be much more than a waldorf/mortimore puppet/sock of some other douche who doesn't want their name tarnished by me by attacking me head on.. rather use you to test out different attacks. 

I look forward to putting you back in check each and every time you feel the need to parrot back one of your peers thoughts about me.

Wow, perhaps the most evil unkind and dishonest individual I have ever encountered on any forum anywhere ever, you don't love Jesus, you just hate anyone disagreeing with you so you have to accuse them of being a sheep and just going with the crowd and belittle their ability to think for themselves, news for you is there are now plenty of people here who know who I am and know I'm a good person and capable of independent thought and opinion, shame on you for stooping so low to win on an argument. Your sense of entitlement and demand to be respected while shitting all over others is incredible you dirty arrogant bastard. If Jesus was real and genuine he would kick your lame ass for your comments and for dishonouring his name, truth is you are an unkind uncompassionate dirty bigot who is so prideful he's lost any kindness and humility that his professed religion ever claimed. Have a nice day.

not people... you. obviously someone put some thought into your words. Obviously again it wasn't yu as you do not have enough experience to make the claims you did. You used someone else's experience with me to have your mind made up for you... which is what makes you a puppet. 

I have no ill will towards puppets nor do I hate the people who wield them. I do have opinions on both but hate is not apart of the deal.

And as far as more person attacks Go.. where do you presume to have the knowledge to assign such a title as entitled or proud? when have you took the time to unbiasedly assess anything I have done?

In truth my first interaction with you ever was you calling me these very same names... so don't pretend now that I fired back a single volley to defend my own honor that you have been justified in anything you have said. You are a biased little pick nose sock puppet and a poor one at that, who again can't seem to hold his own topically as you have to yet make one topical observation or correction, and arementally limited to what amounts to spell check and speculations about another man's dook chute feels.

Is this your legacy? is this all you will be good for? just trading insults others make up for you?

Seriously how could you even wonder why I question your cognitive ability if after 4 posts your best efforts reflect the thoughts of others? Not even in a quotative form of using the thoughts of others/you are not quoting people, you are pretending to know me well enough to use the insults and observations of others to again think for you. Here's the thing little noob. the leftist world where accusation is the equivalent of the truth is all but gone. Granted there are a few hold outs but in truth America, americans won't have this protect the accuser at all cost mentality for much longer. which means unless you can adapt, you and people like you will simply be left to the fringes of the far left as anti social haters. which will have the same if not a more damaging stigma than what you would deem a racist now.

That said I'm done. I'll allow you the words, unless you learn to make a topical observation that deserves serious review.

[adey67]

Because i suspected you from tta, You don't have a clue about my experience mate and as for your other bullshit your claims must be incredibly weak for you to be so incredibly dishonesty dickish self righteous and arrogant, you have however trolled me well, normally I don't allowed dicks to get under my skin so that's a plus for you there, well done.

[Drich]

I find that taking a child life is a wrong....

Sorry, but you can't assume you are right to prove you are right.

which is why you fail.

Fail as a Jedi

Fail as a human being

Fail as a any living cognesent life form.

If there is moral ambiguity ever, when it comes to killing a child/baby infant.. then that person, or society or even life form who can not definitively defend an infant or has to prove it is wrong to kill an infant, does not/should not have any lock on life themselves. Meaning if you need to argue whether or not a infant should live, then you also should be made to argue why you should live.

because no matter the circumstance it is not the child's fault or problem. 

That said if you can come to terms with killing a child then you should be free to be as big a monster as you want to be, maybe killing your own child will bring you to God and if that what it takes for you than who am I to judge that??? however at the same time the rest of the country should not be asked to pay for anything or even allow this in a given state if they do not wish it. However in Zombie states where Satan reigns and the people of that state would sell their children into slavery or consume them as zombies do, then it would be better for the child to return to God rather than to be sold or worse yet be allowed/made to live with a zombie and when old enough be a zombie.

Zombie being representative of any human plight or failure in human rights.

[vulcanlogician]

Wow, perhaps the most evil unkind and dishonest individual I have ever encountered on any forum anywhere ever,

not people... you. obviously someone put some thought into your words. Obviously again it wasn't yu as you do not have enough experience to make the claims you did. You used someone else's experience with me to have your mind made up for you... which is what makes you a puppet. 

I have no ill will towards puppets nor do I hate the people who wield them. I do have opinions on both but hate is not apart of the deal.

And as far as more person attacks Go.. where do you presume to have the knowledge to assign such a title as entitled or proud? when have you took the time to unbiasedly assess anything I have done?

In truth my first interaction with you ever was you calling me these very same names... so don't pretend now that I fired back a single volley to defend my own honor that you have been justified in anything you have said. You are a biased little pick nose sock puppet and a poor one at that, who again can't seem to hold his own topically as you have to yet make one topical observation or correction, and arementally limited to what amounts to spell check and speculations about another man's dook chute feels.

Is this your legacy? is this all you will be good for? just trading insults others make up for you?

Seriously how could you even wonder why I question your cognitive ability if after 4 posts your best efforts reflect the thoughts of others? Not even in a quotative form of using the thoughts of others/you are not quoting people, you are pretending to know me well enough to use the insults and observations of others to again think for you. Here's the thing little noob. the leftist world where accusation is the equivalent of the truth is all but gone. Granted there are a few hold outs but in truth America, americans won't have this protect the accuser at all cost mentality for much longer. which means unless you can adapt, you and people like you will simply be left to the fringes of the far left as anti social haters. which will have the same if not a more damaging stigma than what you would deem a racist now.

That said I'm done. I'll allow you the words, unless you learn to make a topical observation that deserves serious review.

FWIW, I don't consider you to be evil or unkind, Drich. Dishonest? That's an issue worth debating. I feel like on the one side you are committed to your position (truth be damned!) and one could argue that there is a fundamental dishonesty in doing something like that. On the other hand, I think that you, yourself believe most--if not all--of the positions you advance. So if you are merely arguing what you think is true, then you are being honest.

That said, you've taken some positions with which I vehemently disagree... and for good reason. And it's angered me to find you so "non-receptive" to things which are plain and obvious. But as angering as such instances are, I would still consider the accusations of evil or unkind to be misplaced.

Just my two cents.

---

And then you posted that response to Thoreauvian just to prove me wrong. Awesome, dude.

[Alan V]

If there is moral ambiguity ever, when it comes to killing a child/baby infant.. then that person, or society or even life form who can not definitively defend an infant or has to prove it is wrong to kill an infant, does not/should not have any lock on life themselves. Meaning if you need to argue whether or not a infant should live, then you also should be made to argue why you should live.

because no matter the circumstance it is not the child's fault or problem. 

That said if you can come to terms with killing a child then you should be free to be as big a monster as you want to be, maybe killing your own child will bring you to God and if that what it takes for you than who am I to judge that??? however at the same time the rest of the country should not be asked to pay for anything or even allow this in a given state if they do not wish it. However in Zombie states where Satan reigns and the people of that state would sell their children into slavery or consume them as zombies do, then it would be better for the child to return to God rather than to be sold or worse yet be allowed/made to live with a zombie and when old enough be a zombie.

Zombie being representative of any human plight or failure in human rights.

If you have truth on your side, why do you lie about your opponents? No one is claiming it's okay to kill babies, we're claiming zygotes aren't babies.

I find your debate tactics hate-filled and deplorable, so that's it for me.

(How do you place someone on ignore in this forum?)

[The Grand Nudger]

---

And then you posted that response to Thoreauvian just to prove me wrong. Awesome, dude.

He always delivers.  It's never peak Drich.

[adey67]

not people... you. obviously someone put some thought into your words. Obviously again it wasn't yu as you do not have enough experience to make the claims you did. You used someone else's experience with me to have your mind made up for you... which is what makes you a puppet. 

I have no ill will towards puppets nor do I hate the people who wield them. I do have opinions on both but hate is not apart of the deal.

And as far as more person attacks Go.. where do you presume to have the knowledge to assign such a title as entitled or proud? when have you took the time to unbiasedly assess anything I have done?

In truth my first interaction with you ever was you calling me these very same names... so don't pretend now that I fired back a single volley to defend my own honor that you have been justified in anything you have said. You are a biased little pick nose sock puppet and a poor one at that, who again can't seem to hold his own topically as you have to yet make one topical observation or correction, and arementally limited to what amounts to spell check and speculations about another man's dook chute feels.

Is this your legacy? is this all you will be good for? just trading insults others make up for you?

Seriously how could you even wonder why I question your cognitive ability if after 4 posts your best efforts reflect the thoughts of others? Not even in a quotative form of using the thoughts of others/you are not quoting people, you are pretending to know me well enough to use the insults and observations of others to again think for you. Here's the thing little noob. the leftist world where accusation is the equivalent of the truth is all but gone. Granted there are a few hold outs but in truth America, americans won't have this protect the accuser at all cost mentality for much longer. which means unless you can adapt, you and people like you will simply be left to the fringes of the far left as anti social haters. which will have the same if not a more damaging stigma than what you would deem a racist now.

That said I'm done. I'll allow you the words, unless you learn to make a topical observation that deserves serious review.

FWIW, I don't consider you to be evil or unkind, Drich. Dishonest? That's an issue worth debating. I feel like on the one side you are committed to your position (truth be damned!) and one could argue that there is a fundamental dishonesty in doing something like that. On the other hand, I think that you, yourself believe most--if not all--of the positions you advance. So if you are merely arguing what you think is true, then you are being honest.

That said, you've taken some positions with which I vehemently disagree... and for good reason. And it's angered me to find you so "non-receptive" to things which are plain and obvious. But as angering as such instances are, I would still consider the accusations of evil or unkind to be misplaced.

Just my two cents.

---

And then you posted that response to Thoreauvian just to prove me wrong. Awesome, dude.

Perhaps not evil and unkind, that was probably excessive but I kinda lost my temper, normally I don't let lying disingenuous trolls get to me but today I did.

[Alan V]

(How do you place someone on ignore in this forum?)

I found it.