"who your Oaths give access over" vs "right hand possess"

[AFTT47]

It's absurd to think you can have sex with a married slave's wife and God would allow that.

I think it's just a tad bit more absurd that God would be okay with people keeping slaves.

[The Grand Nudger]

@Mystic
I'm just gonna cut to the chase...here.  You're a cultist in a shit religion that worships a cuntgod..and you come here on the boards to rail against everything that you do in service of cuntgod...and somehow, completely fail to realize that.  

You are, in this thread, interpreting the "words of god" to be in accordance with your own desires...and trying to retcon and defend what is a blatantly obvious false attribution -in- magic book - if anything you believe about god is true.

Now... I could poke fun at you all day long (and tommorrow, and the next day, and the day after that) about this..I'm just an asshole like that....but what's far more important, if these things you say are important to you and you actually believe them...is that you allow yourself to follow through with them in your own case. Physician, heal thyself. You're not going to make an inch of progress with the non believers until you can sort your own silly shit out.

[Mystic]

It's absurd to think you can have sex with a married slave's wife and God would allow that.

I think it's just a tad bit more absurd that God would be okay with people keeping slaves.

I agree, which is why these verses are about Muta and never would God allow keeping slaves, rather would command to free them and forbid ever taking people as slaves as did Quran!

[The Grand Nudger]

You must mean "which is why I know that god never said that shit, even though it's in magic book - or..if he did, he's a cunt and fuck that guy".

You need to decide what's more important to you. The inviolability of magic book, or the goodness of god..because here, in this, you have an inescapable decision to make, and even you..nutter that you are... realize that.

[Mystic]

Why isn't Muta a rational interpretation to the term?

[The Grand Nudger]

I keep telling you that you can reinterpret magic book however you like, to be more consistent with your own ideas of what is right or wrong or what a good god would or wouldn't say - and that I applaud you for the impulse.

I'm not even particularly concerned that you're an irrational loon who presents a self refuting explanation for having done so. That shits just academic.

I'm more than willing to let you be you, in order to produce a less shitty fantasy of islam and the islamic god. Though..I'll note here that you being you hasn't done that..at least yet. Just keep going at it with the whiteout, I guess?

[Mystic]

Red-herring bro. Why isn't it a rational interpretation of the term?

[Angrboda]

[The Grand Nudger]

I'm not sure I understand the question?  You can whittle away any reinterpretation of anything you like to be more or less rational, at least with respect to itself and it's internal consistency..that won't change the fact that you've made the change..and if doing that...making changes so that magic book says something you prefer, instead..... is somehow unacceptable to you (and you've indicated that it is).........well...?

That -is- irrational. Do you need an explanation for why a bunch of self defeating shitposts is irrational?

Magic book said something you don't like. You've made it say something else. Again, gratz, keep up the good work.

[Mystic]

Why isn't it a rational way to interpret it by norms of language?