Posts: 67166
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 6:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2019 at 6:38 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Hey, if it is, there's a real nice wife avoidance thing they have nowadays called "divorce". Better that than stumbling the next time one decides to throw a tv, and dropping it on her head. If somebody thinks that the social status quo is unfair now, just imagine that trial.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 1169
Threads: 15
Joined: January 12, 2019
Reputation:
4
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 6:44 pm
(April 1, 2019 at 6:33 pm)Amarok Wrote: (April 1, 2019 at 6:26 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Did you or did you not just explain that being forced to listen to your harpy of a wife made you go "nerd-gorilla" and toss a tube tv across the room....?
I'm guessing that I don't even want to know the answer to why you respond to her in that way, or why you've decided that the best way going forward is just to talk to her less. Because avoiding a problem is always a good way of solving it
Quote:'ll be a little more specific.
Some studies have recently revealed that women are the perpetrators of most unreciprocated violence. Apparently women hit more frequently, but mostly in situations where no one will hit back.
Also, women are far more aggressive with rumor, innnuendo, and reputation destruction.
Also, rage in men subsides pretty quickly, and they frequently make peace with the person who has enraged them fairly quickly. Women are prone to remaining enraged over the long haul, and don't make peace with those who have enraged them so easily.
I rarely try to make peace with a woman who has become enraged with me. It's just not worth the trouble. If she gets over it, she gets over it. If she doesn't, I don't care.
So more empty opining's
Not really. Those three points are all supported by research. The first point has been pretty controversial, and a lot of websites discussing it have been taken down. They weren't taken down because fault was found with the research. Academia has sort of fallen prey to political correctness.
The second and third points are pretty well accepted and not strenuously contested.
We do not inherit the world from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 6:44 pm
(April 1, 2019 at 6:26 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Did you or did you not just explain that being forced to listen to your harpy of a wife made you go "nerd-gorilla" and toss a tube tv across the room....?
I'm guessing that I don't even want to know the answer to why you respond to her in that way, or why you've decided that the best way going forward is just to talk to her less.
"Forced to listen to harpy" and "conversation" are not the same thing. That a lot of people think they are the same is a big part of these problem situations.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 6:45 pm
(April 1, 2019 at 6:44 pm)Yonadav Wrote: (April 1, 2019 at 6:33 pm)Amarok Wrote: Because avoiding a problem is always a good way of solving it
So more empty opining's
Not really. Those three points are all supported by research. The first point has been pretty controversial, and a lot of websites discussing it have been taken down. They weren't taken down because fault was found with the research. Academia has sort of fallen prey to political correctness.
The second and third points are pretty well accepted and not strenuously contested. So conspiracies on top of empty opining's and insistence your crap is widely accepted
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 1169
Threads: 15
Joined: January 12, 2019
Reputation:
4
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 6:50 pm
(April 1, 2019 at 6:36 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Hey, if it is, there's a real nice wife avoidance thing they have nowadays called "divorce". Better that than stumbling the next time one decides to throw a tv, and dropping it on her head. If somebody thinks that the social status quo is unfair now, just imagine that trial.
Actually, he should have called the police when she physically blocked him from leaving. That was illegal. She physically impeded him from leaving. And don't give me any shit about how a weak little woman can't physically stop a man from exiting. If he had forced her aside, then he could have been arrested. Instead of throwing the TV, he should have just called the police and had her arrested. It is absolutely illegal to force a person to remain in a building that they are trying to leave. Men need to get savvy about this shit.
We do not inherit the world from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
Posts: 67166
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 6:51 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2019 at 6:56 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(April 1, 2019 at 6:44 pm)bennyboy Wrote: (April 1, 2019 at 6:26 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Did you or did you not just explain that being forced to listen to your harpy of a wife made you go "nerd-gorilla" and toss a tube tv across the room....?
I'm guessing that I don't even want to know the answer to why you respond to her in that way, or why you've decided that the best way going forward is just to talk to her less.
"Forced to listen to harpy" and "conversation" are not the same thing. That a lot of people think they are the same is a big part of these problem situations.
A woman was talking at you, so you threw a tv. Hindsight is 20/20, I know..but there were better ways to scare a bitch that wouldn't have left you out a tv.
: shrugs :
At least we're getting closer to the source of your gripe about the rage of man. There is a woman who makes you want to throw shit. If I were you, I'd get out of that before you did something (else) stupid. No one with functioning brain cells is going to hear that story, or any story like it, and think "yeah, yeah, in support of the rage of man". They're going to realize that you're an unhinged loon who smashes his toys like a child when the bad lady says mean words.
I'm legitimately surprised that she's still with you...so I guess it's not all bad for guys, right? You can get away with that bullshit.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 7:10 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2019 at 7:11 pm by Amarok.)
Quote: Actually, he should have called the police when she physically blocked him from leaving. That was illegal. She physically impeded him from leaving. And don't give me any shit about how a weak little woman can't physically stop a man from exiting. If he had forced her aside, then he could have been arrested. Instead of throwing the TV, he should have just called the police and had her arrested. It is absolutely illegal to force a person to remain in a building that they are trying to leave. Men need to get savvy about this shit.
(April 1, 2019 at 6:51 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: (April 1, 2019 at 6:44 pm)bennyboy Wrote: "Forced to listen to harpy" and "conversation" are not the same thing. That a lot of people think they are the same is a big part of these problem situations.
A woman was talking at you, so you threw a tv. Hindsight is 20/20, I know..but there were better ways to scare a bitch that wouldn't have left you out a tv.
: shrugs :
At least we're getting closer to the source of your gripe about the rage of man. There is a woman who makes you want to throw shit. If I were you, I'd get out of that before you did something (else) stupid. No one with functioning brain cells is going to hear that story, or any story like it, and think "yeah, yeah, in support of the rage of man". They're going to realize that you're an unhinged loon who smashes his toys like a child when the bad lady says mean words.
I'm legitimately surprised that she's still with you...so I guess it's not all bad for guys, right? You can get away with that bullshit. This very this
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 67166
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 7:15 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2019 at 7:16 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(April 1, 2019 at 6:50 pm)Yonadav Wrote: Actually, he should have called the police when she physically blocked him from leaving.
: wonders what ragefully dialing the cops looks like :
Isn't the idea behind not doing that so that you aren't seen as a cuck and a pussy? The patriarchy strikes again, lol!
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 1169
Threads: 15
Joined: January 12, 2019
Reputation:
4
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 7:15 pm
Note that Amarok would absolutely support having a man arrested if his wife was trying to leave the house and he was physically stopping her.
Note that Amarok ridicules having a woman arrested for physically stopping her husband from leaving the house.
We do not inherit the world from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: In support of the rage of man
April 1, 2019 at 7:16 pm
(April 1, 2019 at 6:36 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Hey, if it is, there's a real nice wife avoidance thing they have nowadays called "divorce". Better that than stumbling the next time one decides to throw a tv, and dropping it on her head. If somebody thinks that the social status quo is unfair now, just imagine that trial.
That's a pretty serious false dilemma. Just because I don't want to engage in conversations likely to upset me doesn't mean I don't love my wife, or that I don't value what we've built together. It does mean we're not best buds like I thought we'd be, and that I don't really communicate with her as much as I used to.
As for divorce-- nah. Part of being a man is making commitments matter. Kids matter, the house matters, the family business matters. I'm not throwing all that away because my wife and I aren't head-over-heels in love in our late 40s.
Maybe when the little guy goes off to college, discussions will be had. Until then. . . I have you guys to shower me in love!
|