Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 30, 2024, 11:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
More religious liberty in Ohio
#21
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
(November 19, 2019 at 7:39 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(November 19, 2019 at 7:26 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Hahahahahahahaha!  No, no..it's okay, you don't understand Ohio (who would?), and that's understandable.  

Wink

Yes, it's explicitly aimed at evangelical conservatives.  Yes, it would let them blow jesus all over their tests and claim persecution.  Best case scenario, is that it's just a shameless attempt to pander to that demographic ahead of 2020, that will amount to nothing.

Hahahahahahahaha!

You should read the bill.  ALL of the bill.  I don't know I can make it any plainer:  It specifically prevents a student from getting a better grade for invoking Jesus (or any other religious idea).

Boru

It would also prevent them from getting a worse grade.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#22
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
(November 19, 2019 at 5:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(November 19, 2019 at 5:09 pm)Grandizer Wrote: I absolutely disagree with these shitty allowances that continue to foster these Christianity-based privileges in society, but it seems like it's basically a "it's not what you think, but how you think" which in principle (at least) is a good thing.

It's not fostering a Christianity-based privilege.  It's preventing one.

Boru

Fair enough. Should read the bill first lol

Still disagree with the prevent bit, based on what you described
Reply
#23
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
(November 19, 2019 at 7:44 pm)brewer Wrote:
(November 19, 2019 at 7:39 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Hahahahahahahaha!

You should read the bill.  ALL of the bill.  I don't know I can make it any plainer:  It specifically prevents a student from getting a better grade for invoking Jesus (or any other religious idea).

Boru

It would also prevent them from getting a worse grade.

Exactly.  Why should they get a worse grade?

If the question is 'What is the capital of the UK?', the correct answer is 'London'.  Full marks.

If the question is 'What is the capital of the UK?', the correct answer is 'London, praise Jesus.'  Still full marks.

How does adding 'praise Jesus' make the answer any less correct?  If the answer isn't any less correct, why should they get a lower grade?

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#24
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
(November 19, 2019 at 7:48 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(November 19, 2019 at 7:44 pm)brewer Wrote: It would also prevent them from getting a worse grade.

Exactly.  Why should they get a worse grade?

If the question is 'What is the capital of the UK?', the correct answer is 'London'.  Full marks.

If the question is 'What is the capital of the UK?', the correct answer is 'London, praise Jesus.'  Still full marks.

How does adding 'praise Jesus' make the answer any less correct?  If the answer isn't any less correct, why should they get a lower grade?

Boru

No offense but it seems like you're thinking only in black and white. Let me put forward a couple of hypothetical's as examples. 

Speech class where the student is to demonstrate different types of speeches (motivational, impromptu, ......) The teacher assigns a directional where the student is to describe the steps to complete a task (i.w. bake a cake). The religious student gives a speech about how to pray. 

Art class where the students are learning to draw human models/forms. The assignment is to draw someone in the family. The student returns with a drawing of jesus stating that they consider jesus part of the family.

Sounds like in these examples they should get a worse grade, but it also sounds like a case that could be challenged.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#25
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
(November 19, 2019 at 8:07 pm)brewer Wrote:
(November 19, 2019 at 7:48 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Exactly.  Why should they get a worse grade?

If the question is 'What is the capital of the UK?', the correct answer is 'London'.  Full marks.

If the question is 'What is the capital of the UK?', the correct answer is 'London, praise Jesus.'  Still full marks.

How does adding 'praise Jesus' make the answer any less correct?  If the answer isn't any less correct, why should they get a lower grade?

Boru

No offense but it seems like you're thinking only in black and white. Let me put forward a couple of hypothetical's as examples. 

Speech class where the student is to demonstrate different types of speeches (motivational, impromptu, ......) The teacher assigns a directional where the student is to describe the steps to complete a task (i.w. bake a cake). The religious student gives a speech about how to pray. 

Art class where the students are learning to draw human models/forms. The assignment is to draw someone in the family. The student returns with a drawing of jesus stating that they consider jesus part of the family.

Sounds like in these examples they should get a worse grade, but it also sounds like a case that could be challenged.

No offense taken.

But the bill states that they can't get a worse grade because of religious content.  I don't see how these hypotheticals would be an issue.  If the student describes how to pray, as long as it follows what is being taught in the course, so what? As for the Jesus-drawing, as long as it conforms to things like line and perspective, ok.

WHY should a student who draws Jesus as part of a drawing class (or a student who declaims on how to pray for a speech class) be given a worse grade based on their choice of subject?

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#26
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
I've got a bridge to sell you Boru.

The correct catholic answer, by the way, is "The Vatican". It's gods capital, ergo it's the capital of the entire universe. The content and substance of my answer are credible, don't restrict my religious freedumbs!

Though... I doubt that the fundies had the followers of Cathol, or worse...muslims in mind when they decided to write an explicitly pandering bill. They're not interested in better grades...they're tired of getting failing grades, lol. Bad grades are persecution, dontchaknow. If they can't tell their teacher, in erudite sentences..... that the test is wrong, based on their firmly held religious principle of being committed dipshits, that's as good as sending them to the gulag.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#27
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
Just so we’re clear, this the text of the bill:

Quote: Sec. 3320.03. No school district board of education, governing authority of a community school established under Chapter 3314. of the Revised Code, governing body of a STEM school established under Chapter 3326. of the Revised Code, or board of trustees of a college-preparatory boarding school established under Chapter 3328. of the Revised Code shall prohibit a student from engaging in religious expression in the completion of homework, artwork, or other written or oral assignments. Assignment grades and scores shall be calculated using ordinary academic standards of substance and relevance, including any legitimate pedagogical concerns, and shall not penalize or reward a student based on the religious content of a student’s work.

The “substance and relevance” portion should point towards Boru’s argument. Then again, If true, it would seem largely superfluous, but it’s only when the law is interpreted that we can tell if it’s good or not.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Reply
#28
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
(November 19, 2019 at 8:43 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(November 19, 2019 at 8:07 pm)brewer Wrote: No offense but it seems like you're thinking only in black and white. Let me put forward a couple of hypothetical's as examples. 

Speech class where the student is to demonstrate different types of speeches (motivational, impromptu, ......) The teacher assigns a directional where the student is to describe the steps to complete a task (i.w. bake a cake). The religious student gives a speech about how to pray. 

Art class where the students are learning to draw human models/forms. The assignment is to draw someone in the family. The student returns with a drawing of jesus stating that they consider jesus part of the family.

Sounds like in these examples they should get a worse grade, but it also sounds like a case that could be challenged.

No offense taken.

But the bill states that they can't get a worse grade because of religious content.  I don't see how these hypotheticals would be an issue.  If the student describes how to pray, as long as it follows what is being taught in the course, so what? As for the Jesus-drawing, as long as it conforms to things like line and perspective, ok.

WHY should a student who draws Jesus as part of a drawing class (or a student who declaims on how to pray for a speech class) be given a worse grade based on their choice of subject?

Boru

Talking about praying was not the assignment. Drawing jesus was not the assignment. Not completing an assignment gets you a worse grade.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#29
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
Not if the proponents of this bill have anything to say about it, you filthy liberal-spiring un-person.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#30
RE: More religious liberty in Ohio
The problem in the bill is decide *which* academic standards are to be used. Let's give a scenario.

Suppose we are in a geology class and the teacher asks when the Jurassic period was. One student gives ana answer of 8250 years ago.

Can the teacher mark it wrong?

The student claims that this is the correct answer according to their religion and it conforms to the conclusions of the Institute for Creation Research, so it passes *their* religions academic standards.

According to this law, as stated, the teacher cannot give the student a lower grade for that answer.

And that is fundamentally wrong.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  No more contraceptives due to religious objections Foxaèr 6 464 July 9, 2020 at 7:20 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Ohio At It Again BrianSoddingBoru4 16 1056 December 1, 2019 at 12:19 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Nine killed in Dayton, Ohio EgoDeath 120 8711 August 14, 2019 at 10:33 pm
Last Post: EgoDeath
  So much about religious liberty Fake Messiah 14 1620 February 8, 2019 at 9:24 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  The Jeff Sessions "Religious Liberty Task Force" Foxaèr 126 8108 August 6, 2018 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Ohio bans doctors from performing Down Syndrome abortions c172 234 30529 January 1, 2018 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Caught Another Jesus Phony in Ohio Minimalist 5 893 November 16, 2017 at 11:41 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Franklin Township Ohio To Reinstall Confederate Monument A Theist 95 16493 October 2, 2017 at 8:12 am
Last Post: Joods
  Active Shooter Situation at Ohio State Minimalist 123 12500 December 1, 2016 at 11:42 pm
Last Post: A Theist
  Very suspicious-looking "suicide" in Ohio Regina 10 2035 May 26, 2016 at 12:49 pm
Last Post: Chad32



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)