which version of christianity is correct?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Isn' t this sorta like asking - which is the brainiest of The Three Stooges?

Moe.  Definitely Moe.

Boru

[Abaddon_ire]

Didnt watch the video, why would i waste my time with such nonsense?
Which version of christianity is true? I beleive in none of them, all sound as absurd as it gets.
Now ban me, Drichy.

They can't all be correct. All but one AT MOST must be incorrect. And there are thousands of denominations.

However, they can all be wrong. And this appears to be the case.

Of all the flavours of deism/theism I have encountered, perhaps one or to were vaguely persuasive if one were to squint at them in poor light. Even then, they all fall apart under the slightest scrutiny. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

Even Jainism, possibly the meekest, mildest form falls apart rather quickly.

The real problem here, though, is that Drich proposes a particularly toxic form of religion to be the "right one".

Put it this way. If Drich's particular deity were absolutely demonstrated to be real, my very next question would be "How do we kill the bastard?".

[Deesse23]

10 bucks as he posted this also on AD. Lemme check.

[Drich]

The spam defense.  That's a bold move Cotton.

only if you do not understand the definition of spam.

Spamming is not allowed. Spamming includes, but is not limited to:

• Creating multiple threads with the same or similar thread subject in a short space of time.
  

• one thread was created
  
  
  
• Repeatedly posting responses to existing threads that are unrelated to the current discussion(s) in the thread.
  
• no existing responses were posted the video is a opening statment or opening post. no different than when I write out posts and do the same.
  
  
  

  Repeatedly posting links, copy/pasted content, or scripture verses, unless they are relevant to the thread and have the member's own comments added to them.

• no links,  copy and pasted content no scripture none of this
  
  
  

  Posting an abundance of content you've pre-written for purposes other than forum use (i.e. essays, blog posts, etc.)

• this video was designed for forum use only. it is not seen in any other context. in fact alot of the subject matter is open ended for the sake of discussion.
  

This is not spam, this is an OP who has been put to video.

Nothing says each op has to be original and unique.. how many times has guns/ban come up? how many times have you all asked which church is the right church?

---

you've been here even longer and should know that the limitation put on responders is meaningless. in fact it is often seen as a I double dare you to respond. 

I made one post and posted three different times. this particular 'limitation' was direct at a christian website and it's members who love to just data dump. no new thoughts or material but just dump page after page after page of dialog they have on a subject then run.

A few things: 

You joined AF in 2012, I joined in 2013. 

If attempting to limit who can participate is meaningless, then there was no point in you doing it, was there?

You haven't had a new thought since Christ was a corporal.  Follow the rules or find another sandbox.

Boru

---

"Which version of Christianity is correct?" Is like asking which version of "Hebrew/Jewish" is correct, is like asking which version of the "Koran" is correct.

There are also different competing sects of Buddhism, Hinduism too.

but the answer is different.

[Abaddon_ire]

The spam defense.  That's a bold move Cotton.

only if you do not understand the definition of spam.

Spamming is not allowed. Spamming includes, but is not limited to:

• Creating multiple threads with the same or similar thread subject in a short space of time.
  

• one thread was created
  
  
  
• Repeatedly posting responses to existing threads that are unrelated to the current discussion(s) in the thread.
  
• no existing responses were posted the video is a opening statment or opening post. no different than when I write out posts and do the same.
  
  
  Repeatedly posting links, copy/pasted content, or scripture verses, unless they are relevant to the thread and have the member's own comments added to them.
• no links,  copy and pasted content no scripture none of this
  
  
  Posting an abundance of content you've pre-written for purposes other than forum use (i.e. essays, blog posts, etc.)
• this video was designed for forum use only. it is not seen in any other context. in fact alot of the subject matter is open ended for the sake of discussion.
  

This is not spam, this is an OP who has been put to video.

Nothing says each op has to be original and unique.. how many times has guns/ban come up? how many times have you all asked which church is the right church?

---

A few things: 

You joined AF in 2012, I joined in 2013. 

If attempting to limit who can participate is meaningless, then there was no point in you doing it, was there?

You haven't had a new thought since Christ was a corporal.  Follow the rules or find another sandbox.

Boru

Which church is the "right" one? That is asked a lot.

Your answer is always "Mine".

Billions of your fellow christians think you are full of it. 

We don't need atheists to dismiss this level of BS.

Sorry.

[Drich]

So, I watched about half of the vid. I'll watch the rest later, just for intellectual honesty.

But here's the problems I have so far.

First of all, I am not sure why this is being posted on an atheist forum? After all, why should we care which version of Christianity you or other Christians believe is the 'correct' one? Isn't this an issue you, and all other Christians should be discussing among yourselves?

Because, as others have already said, we disbelieve ALL versions are correct.

But of course, like so many of your posts, you are putting many, many carts before the horse.

well because you all use the argument like it is 'sweeping Danielsan's leg.' You think and parade this foolish assumption around like you just won the finals or something. It is a subject that does take a great deal of effort to write out and discuss. I wanted something i could point to next time one of you says there is 30k form of christianity how is it you think your specific brand is correct... Not to mention squashing some of that by exploring it as a forum topic before it is even used.

---

Didnt watch the video, why would i waste my time with such nonsense?

as one of your peers put it.. 'intellectual honesty.'/So you can have an educated and honest opinion, if that is important yo people any more.

Which version of christianity is true? I beleive in none of them, all sound as absurd as it gets.
Now ban me, Drichy.

i believe in freedom of speech, even unpopular speech. why would I ban you?

---

10 bucks as he posted this also on AD. Lemme check.

and CF.com cause I am able to have upto 50 conversations at a time and remember your different positions, and arguments. Otherwise i get bored waiting for one of you to answer, and I'll go off and find something else to do.

---

Didnt watch the video, why would i waste my time with such nonsense?
Which version of christianity is true? I beleive in none of them, all sound as absurd as it gets.
Now ban me, Drichy.

They can't all be correct. All but one AT MOST must be incorrect. And there are thousands of denominations.

However, they can all be wrong. And this appears to be the case.

all discussed and contained in the video.

Of all the flavours of deism/theism I have encountered, perhaps one or to were vaguely persuasive if one were to squint at them in poor light. Even then, they all fall apart under the slightest scrutiny. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

because you have a low tolerance in looking at things you do not pre approve of.

Even Jainism, possibly the meekest, mildest form falls apart rather quickly.

The real problem here, though, is that Drich proposes a particularly toxic form of religion to be the "right one".

Put it this way. If Drich's particular deity were absolutely demonstrated to be real, my very next question would be "How do we kill the bastard?".

Nor does it seem like you are a fan of history/learn from your past mistakes.

---

Which church is the "right" one? That is asked a lot.

Your answer is always "Mine".

Billions of your fellow christians think you are full of it. 

We don't need atheists to dismiss this level of BS.

Sorry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_asNhzXq72w

sorry no. my answer is not 'mine.' my answer is in the video. it's we are all wrong to one degree or another.

but I also purpose we were never meant to all be right either.

[The Grand Nudger]

Not 51, and not 49. 50.

[Drich]

Not 51, and not 49.  50.

dont be jelly

[The Grand Nudger]

Reminds me of my favorite episode of the X-Files. Bad Blood, where Patrick Renna played Ronnie Strickland. Mulder escapes death by scattering sunflower seeds across the floor. Tons of old fairy tales about vampires with obsessive compulsions like counting seeds.

Which brings us right back round to your video. The fairy tale of some true christian church is a popular one..and just like vampires..it's always good for a laugh.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Reminds me of my favorite episode of the X-Files.  Bad Blood, where Patrick Renna played Ronnie Strickland.  Mulder escapes death by scattering sunflower seeds across the floor.  Tons of old fairy tales about vampires with obsessive compulsions like counting seeds.

Which brings us right back round to your video.  The fairy tale of some true christian church is a popular one..and just like vampires..it's always good for a laugh.

Just an aside:

Vampires can be killed by driving a wooden stake through their heart. Luckily, this technique is also effective for dispatching non-vampires. So your extra stakes needn’t go to waste.

Boru