angel story video form

[The Architect Of Fate]

again despite what you personally feel here are couple of examples of eyewitness testimony ability to ensure a conviction or even exonerate. there are even examples where DNA convicts, but eyewitnesses place the suspect out of the realm of possible suspects.

clearwatercriminallawyer.net/florida-court-of-appeals-affirms-eyewitness-testimony-is-sufficient-evidence-to-support-a-conviction-for-a-crime/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...you-think/

I all comes down to how it is collected and the circumstance/stress.

Yup one article against decades of research and again his isn't my feels based opinion . And nope regardless of collection method it plagued with issues . And the limitations of forensics does not change this.

Not his problem .

[size] kinda is.. I presented a eyewitness account and you have no way of refuting it. I can confirm my end by the mere fact this to again one degree or another is offer to everyone. If you follow God instructions.[/size][/quote]
Nope you present an account and that's all .It's not his job to refute it , And we have no reason to follow said instructions .

not true. I have mine and a billion or so others have theirs.
To which the same sort of experience is offered to you.
remember only 4% of you claim there is nothing.

You have presented a story as have they .Weather 4% reject it or 96 it makes no difference. There is no reason to believe that it is

kinda is if your/he is going to call me a liar. such a charge demands proof.

Nope we can disbelieve you without proof

[Drich]

HEY STOOP-ED IT's Already in the BIBLE!!! OTHERS HAVE GONE THROUGH SIMILAR EXPERIENCES I WENT THOUGH!!!! How stoop-ed are you to keep arguing this point?!?!?

Your fairytale agrees with the mythology you grew up in. Underwhelming.

korean buddhist that is what i grew up with..

Then was sent to the parking lot of a church to play in a korean only church. Then fell in with my dad as a
'spiritualist' Then atheist.

why not ask where and how i grew up rather than assume you have it all figured out. that's right you people don't/cant think for yourselves. you only know how to repeat the arguments of others and if you were to ask question the parameters would change too much and you would not know how to modify the argument. so you assume i must be a life long christian. nupe. proud atheist and did a way better job than most of you. loved to break a christian down and make them cry. or force them to give up or better yet curse me out.

You're as boring as your videos Drich.

No capacity to think about what you're saying.

project much? remember you are the one who does not ask questions, but rather assert sterotypes on to people so you can give a stock retort.

You just regurgitate the same old tired tripe and then get really surprised when nobody's impressed.

if it is all the same old stuff. then you should be able to subjectively address each and every point i make line by line as i have done here with your last post. but you can't/don't do that do you.. just sayn the 'evidence' shows the faults you have pointed out seem to belong to you, rather than me.

---

Your fairytale agrees with the mythology you grew up in. Underwhelming.

You're as boring as your videos Drich. No capacity to think about what you're saying. You just regurgitate the same old tired tripe and then get really surprised when nobody's impressed.

Other people having a similar experience doesn't mean dick .Let alone poof of god .

again depends on the message and what they do with it.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Your fairytale agrees with the mythology you grew up in. Underwhelming.

korean buddhist that is what i grew up with..

Then was sent to the parking lot of a church to play in a korean only church. Then fell in with my dad as a
'spiritualist' Then atheist.

why not ask where and how i grew up rather than assume you have it all figured out. that's right you people don't/cant think for yourselves. you only know how to repeat the arguments of others and if you were to ask question the parameters would change too much and you would not know how to modify the argument. so you assume i must be a life long christian. nupe. proud atheist and did a way better job than most of you. loved to break a christian down and make them cry. or force them to give up or better yet curse me out.

You're as boring as your videos Drich.

 

No capacity to think about what you're saying.

project much? remember you are the one who does not ask questions, but rather assert sterotypes on to people so you can give a stock retort.

You just regurgitate the same old tired tripe and then get really surprised when nobody's impressed.

if it is all the same old stuff. then you should be able to subjectively address each and every point i make line by line as i have done here with your last post. but you can't/don't do that do you.. just sayn the 'evidence' shows the faults you have pointed out seem to belong to you, rather than me.

---

Other people having a similar experience doesn't mean dick .Let alone poof of god .

again depends on the message and what they do with it.

Nope regardless of the message or what they do with it

[Drich]

again despite what you personally feel here are couple of examples of eyewitness testimony ability to ensure a conviction or even exonerate. there are even examples where DNA convicts, but eyewitnesses place the suspect out of the realm of possible suspects.

clearwatercriminallawyer.net/florida-court-of-appeals-affirms-eyewitness-testimony-is-sufficient-evidence-to-support-a-conviction-for-a-crime/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...you-think/

I all comes down to how it is collected and the circumstance/stress.

Yup one article against decades of research 

look again dummy i have posted an article and a court ruling from 2018 which states that eyewitness testimony is still considered to be primary evidence source. Meaning if you get 2 or 3 people together to say a man is not guilty and you have 3 other items says he is the he will most likely be set free.

Your 'research' only ever looks at one sided testimony. when testimony is used to identify an innocent person it is almost never over turned.
not only that 25% of the guilty can be argued as being accurate. so putting the two percentages together eye witness testimony has a 75% accuracy rating. There are even examples of eye witness testimony over turning police obtained confessions. IE the cops stress s dude into a guilty plea but dude was out on a party boat with 5 other people or something along those lines.. Still the point is when you look at the whole picture (think for yourself and not let a biased article tell what to think) you will look at the other side of eyewitness testimony and see it is almost 100% reliable if done in the right way.

So all this aside are you now past the idea that eye witness testimony is not hear say? Do you finally concede youve learned something?

Nope you present an account and that's all .It's not his job to refute it , And we hae no reason to follow said instructions .

duh... good at point out the obvious? no one has any reason to follow God's instructions unless they want absolute proof of God.
So if you or whom ever you are speaking of in the 3rd person seeks proof of God here are the instructions to find him. if you are not then fine. all i am saying is at this point unless you have proof of me lying, you can not call me a lair simply because you do not want to believe what i have said.
I provided proof. you are the judge of it. if you want to be fair and know the truth i have provided a theologically sound way to discern the truth of this theological matter. no other intellectual discipline is capable to discern this matter as it has not the tools to account for all the variables in theology.

So again here is the proof in my eye witness account and i can provide you with the step by step want to see for yourself and verify if what i said is true.

[The Grand Nudger]

Still trying hard to convince people that you see shit, still not understanding why you seeing shit is a hilariously poor hill to die on.

[The Architect Of Fate]

look again dummy i have posted an article and a court ruling from 2018 which states that eyewitness testimony is still considered to be primary evidence source. Meaning if you get 2 or 3 people together to say a man is not guilty and you have 3 other items says he is the he will most likely be set free.

I did look (you first link did work but looked it up anyway)

Yup as i said in my original comment .The legal system is behind so your first link is irrelevant.

Your 'research' only ever looks at one sided testimony. when testimony is used to identify an innocent person it is almost never over turned.
not only that 25% of the guilty can be argued as being accurate. so putting the two percentages together eye witness testimony has a 75% accuracy rating. There are even examples of eye witness testimony over turning police obtained confessions. IE the cops stress s dude into a guilty plea but dude was out on a party boat with 5 other people or something along those lines.. Still the point is when you look at the whole picture (think for yourself and not let a biased article tell what to think) you will look at the other side of eyewitness testimony and see it is almost 100% reliable if done in the right way.

Accept it's not my research ( as i am not a scientist ) it's sciences research. As for the rest of this paragraph it's either inaccurate or irrelevant  

So all this aside are you now past the idea that eye witness testimony is not hear say? Do you finally concede youve learned something?

Nope because you have taught nothing

[arewethereyet]

I hear they have medication that helps with audio and visual hallucinations...might want to check that out.

[The Architect Of Fate]

h... good at point out the obvious? no one has any reason to follow God's instructions unless they want absolute proof of God.

Or don't have any seriouis reason to think it will work or there gods instructions

So if you or whom ever you are speaking of in the 3rd person seeks proof of God here are the instructions to find him.

Or they have no reason to accept the instruction are accurate and thus have no reason to follow them 

if you are not then fine.

Or you have no reason to accept the instruction are accurate and thus have no reason to follow them 

all i am saying is at this point unless you have proof of me lying, you can not call me a lair simply because you do not want to believe what i have said.

Nope we can disbelieve you without proving your lying and are completely justified in doing so.

I provided proof. you are the judge of it

No you have not you have provided claims not proof 

 if you want to be fair and know the truth i have provided a theologically sound way to discern the truth of this theological matter.

Not accepting your claims is more then fair and is truthful till shown otherwise .You have provided no proof you have provided a bunch of theological claims nothing more 

no other intellectual discipline is capable to discern this matter as it has not the tools to account for all the variables in theology.

Too bad it isn't an intellectual discipline and no other discipline needs to account for theologies claims .Because theology is itself just a bunch of claims.

So again here is the proof in my eye witness account and i can provide you with the step by step want to see for yourself and verify if what i said is true.

So no proof then and no reason to accept your claims . As i said .

---

So to sum up 

1. Dirch makes a bunch of claims and claims on top of those claims and calls it proof 

2. Demands we prove what he's claiming is not the case .Despite us having no such epistemic obligation.

[Anomalocaris]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XFuZh4X2rk

This is me retelling the angel story i shared here a few times. this time we are retracing my steps in the car to show the area and how fast everything happened. i have it written out in the link below:
https://atheistforums.org/thread-13378.html

Jesus H. Tap Dancing Christ! I can't believe I watched the whole thing and don't consider it a loss of precious time! 

@Drich: I don't believe you. You are either lying or delusional.

Why Or?   Why not and?

There is no doubt he is a out and out liar.  That doesn’t mean he isn’t also out and out delusional.

A liar can add lies to delusions.  In cryptography that’s called double encipherment.   The difference is in drich’s case the so called cipher is largely made up on the spot, and it often contains no real message at its base at all.  He just thinks it makes him look cool and scores points with his delusions when he throws gibberish around with what he conceive to be an authoritative preachy voice.

There is a reason why he is not just a moron, but a trumpomatic moron.

[The Architect Of Fate]

So overall Dirch  strikes out 

Well this was fun but i'm done