Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
March 6, 2022 at 1:36 pm (This post was last modified: March 6, 2022 at 1:38 pm by emjay.)
(March 6, 2022 at 11:49 am)The L Wrote: We ought to do whatever we can to prevent a third world war. With no exceptions.
And by 'we' I mean us humans on the side of Goodness who can also do anything about it
Personally, I stay out of politics.
Impersonally, I'm very against WW3. Personally, I can't do anything to prevent it. Unfortunately.
Usually I don't get too involved in politics either, or at least not in talking/arguing about it, but I think this is important to talk about. Indeed Zelenskyy appealed in one of his latest videos for the West to get dialogues going... to talk about it... so it's the least we/I can do I think. In any case I'm feeling the increasing need to vent/get things off my chest, so, better out than in.
(March 6, 2022 at 11:33 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Again, War is a continuation of politics by other means. Push a state with means to wage violence to the point where existential concern can’t be address by politics short of war, politics will continue under the guise of war.
I must have not paid enough attention... What did Ukraine do to push Russia into invading it?
Putin says sanctions are an act of war. If we are already at war with Putin, why not have a no-fly zone? Why not bomb Russian troop convoys?
But of course, we aren't at war.
I actually think Putin could be crazy enough to drop nukes, if he is on the edge of losing power. I think he is a psychopath. If he can't win, he'll make sure nobody can win.
This is why nuclear arms are madness. They cannot be used by sane people, even during war, but one day they will be used by insane people.
(March 6, 2022 at 11:38 am)pocaracas Wrote: I must have not paid enough attention... What did Ukraine do to push Russia into invading it?
It existed. That's all the excuse Putain needed.
Ukraine does not pose an existential threat to Russia, and hasn’t since it got rid of its nukes. The possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and getting nukes again is not an existential threat. If Ukraine does join NATO and gets nukes at some point, it would still not necessarily be an existential threat, as the tactical weapons they are likely to be supplied with would be neither numerous enough or powerful enough to destroy Russia.
Putin using that possibility for the invasion is laughable, as the are already State actors with the capability of destroying Russia (but at a nightmarishly high cost). If that concern was legitimate, Putin would have attacked the US, France, Great Britain, China or India.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
March 6, 2022 at 6:17 pm (This post was last modified: March 6, 2022 at 6:19 pm by pocaracas.)
(March 6, 2022 at 11:49 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(March 6, 2022 at 11:38 am)pocaracas Wrote: I must have not paid enough attention... What did Ukraine do to push Russia into invading it?
The US pushed Russia into invading Ukraine by making it clear Ukraine joining the nato can mean american medium and intermediate rate nuclear weapons can be deployed to Ukraine, which largely nullifies Russia’s nuclear deterrence by allow a strike to hit Moscow and Russian nuclear sites with less than 4-5 minutes of warning.
Yeah... I heard that weak sauce excuse, but it makes no sense.
Why is Russia allowed to be so devastated by the potential for weapons near its borders, while... it has those same or worse weapons at the ready to strike anywhere in Europe?
If it looks like a double standard, it's because it is.
You can's accuse, judge and execute others of wrongdoing something that you yourself are doing.
This reason also defies logic considering how Estonia Latvia and Lithuania are NATO members and have borders with Russia and are somewhat closer to the two larger Russian cities (maybe there is a spot in Ukraine that is closer to Moscow than any of these, but not by much).
So... how did Ukraine push Russia into invading it?
But this is no credible and "fair" basis (as in, defensible by the propaganda machine) for invading a sovereign country.
But it does tie in neatly with them seizing the nuclear power stations.
(March 6, 2022 at 3:37 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(March 6, 2022 at 2:57 pm)Nomad Wrote: It existed. That's all the excuse Putain needed.
Ukraine does not pose an existential threat to Russia, and hasn’t since it got rid of its nukes. The possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and getting nukes again is not an existential threat. If Ukraine does join NATO and gets nukes at some point, it would still not necessarily be an existential threat, as the tactical weapons they are likely to be supplied with would be neither numerous enough or powerful enough to destroy Russia.
Putin using that possibility for the invasion is laughable, as the are already State actors with the capability of destroying Russia (but at a nightmarishly high cost). If that concern was legitimate, Putin would have attacked the US, France, Great Britain, China or India.
Boru
Don't forget Pakistan.
How can Putin trust those who harboured the Taliban who once got some assistance from the US to fight against Russian forces when Afghanistan was invaded?
March 6, 2022 at 7:12 pm (This post was last modified: March 6, 2022 at 7:12 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(March 6, 2022 at 6:17 pm)pocaracas Wrote:
(March 6, 2022 at 11:49 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: The US pushed Russia into invading Ukraine by making it clear Ukraine joining the nato can mean american medium and intermediate rate nuclear weapons can be deployed to Ukraine, which largely nullifies Russia’s nuclear deterrence by allow a strike to hit Moscow and Russian nuclear sites with less than 4-5 minutes of warning.
Yeah... I heard that weak sauce excuse, but it makes no sense.
Why is Russia allowed to be so devastated by the potential for weapons near its borders, while... it has those same or worse weapons at the ready to strike anywhere in Europe?
If it looks like a double standard, it's because it is.
You can's accuse, judge and execute others of wrongdoing something that you yourself are doing.
This reason also defies logic considering how Estonia Latvia and Lithuania are NATO members and have borders with Russia and are somewhat closer to the two larger Russian cities (maybe there is a spot in Ukraine that is closer to Moscow than any of these, but not by much).
So... how did Ukraine push Russia into invading it?
But this is no credible and "fair" basis (as in, defensible by the propaganda machine) for invading a sovereign country.
But it does tie in neatly with them seizing the nuclear power stations.
(March 6, 2022 at 3:37 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Ukraine does not pose an existential threat to Russia, and hasn’t since it got rid of its nukes. The possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and getting nukes again is not an existential threat. If Ukraine does join NATO and gets nukes at some point, it would still not necessarily be an existential threat, as the tactical weapons they are likely to be supplied with would be neither numerous enough or powerful enough to destroy Russia.
Putin using that possibility for the invasion is laughable, as the are already State actors with the capability of destroying Russia (but at a nightmarishly high cost). If that concern was legitimate, Putin would have attacked the US, France, Great Britain, China or India.
Boru
Don't forget Pakistan.
How can Putin trust those who harboured the Taliban who once got some assistance from the US to fight against Russian forces when Afghanistan was invaded?
Thank you - I did indeed forget Pakistan.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?” –SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
(March 6, 2022 at 11:45 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: This is Oleg Fedko, his wife Irina and daughter Sofia. They were fleeing Kherson, Ukraine. With them, their infant son Ivan, and Oleg's parents.
All six were shot and killed by Russian soldiers after putting their hands up and begging not to be shot with children.
But, but...it was "necessary" to kill them!!! Imagine noone shitting his pants over Russias nukes otherwise.
Im (not so much) sorry, Oleg, Irina and Sofia, but, you know, its the USA anyway who pushed some russian soldier killing you. Please remember that.