Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 6, 2024, 2:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Russia and Ukraine
RE: Russia and Ukraine
Quote:a country that will fight a nuclear war over Ukraine can’t care less about saving face over Ukraine. Russia will destroy the world to forestall a nato Ukraine, she will certainly destroy Ukraine to forestall a nato Ukraine.
Bullshit  Hehe

Russia is obsessed with making this not look like the failure it is and this never had anything to do with Nato no matter how much you repeat that Kremlin talking point  Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
yea, you have no reason to believe any of what you believe other than you want to believe that, and to believe it you just chose to disbelieve anything else.  

No go play.
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
Quote:yea, you have no reason to believe any of what you believe other than you want to believe that, and to believe it you just chose to disbelieve anything else.  
Nope, But nice projection there.


Quote:No go play.
Nah, how about you do that instead and let the adults talk politics Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
If the Russians are looking to keep this war simmering, that'd be a big mistake. Putin's going to have to crack down domestically ever-harder as the body-bags return home and samizdat gets word out about what's really going on. The Russians have already shut down their largest tank factory due to lack of supplies, war is not a cheap business either, and the sanctions will carry more bite once what's left of Russia's foreign reserves is deplenished.

Meanwhile, the Germans will be forced to abandoned Russian fuel sourcing, and will likely not come back to them even after the war due to the distrust that has been engendered, so there's another long-term effect deleterious to Mother Russia.

Now add in President Xi's willingness to help out a fellow autocrat -- for a price -- and I think the longer Russia stays, the deeper they come under China's sway, the worse off the average Russian will be, the shakier Putin's regime will be, and the lost diplomatic credibility will be abandoned or a generation or two.

Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
The western sanction will not end just because Ukrainian war ended.   It is clear Putin has already written off removal of the sanctions as an attainable objective.  

He also clearly is taking EU’s word that it will reduce reliance on Russian gas by 2/3 this year, and have concluded there is no really long term revenue stream potential from European gas sales anyway.  So he can make the most out of the gas that Russian still has to deliver,  not by trying to enhance and draw out the remaining revenue stream, but by using it as a lever to squeeze the EU in the short run to maximize acute pain to force  short term political concessions out of the most gas dependent EU states at the some expense of the remaining revenue stream.

If one looks at the fates the US allowed to descent on autocrats who succumbed to our bidding, such as Hussein and kaddhafi, there is nothing in it for Putin or Russia to not play the hardest possible ball with the west, particularly the US.    At this point, Russia probably feels that given the sanction will not be lifted in the foreseeable future,  Russia can get a much better deal from China, particularly if the US and EU continue to play hard ball with China in west pacific.    So long as the US play hardball with China, and the EU follows along, Putin has plenty of bargaining power over China.

For one thing, right now Chinese nuclear arsenal is minuscule compare to those of Russia and the US.   Regardless of the conventional balance of power over Taiwan, the US could blackmail china out of any thoughts of seizing Taiwan by force by simply implying the US will go nuclear to stop China.    China has no counter to this at all, and won’t for at least 5-10 years, because if China retaliates by using nuclear weapons as well, she would be crushed in the resulting exchange.     By the end of the period when China could build up a really credible nuclear umbrella of her own,  a US led alliance could have made Taiwan impregnable to China.     Putin can immeasurably improve China’s bargaining power and strategic position in the next 5-10 years by offering to extend the Russian nuclear umbrella to cover China. 

If China proper is secured by the Russian nuclear umbrella, then China can freely respond to any american nuclear escalation over Taiwan by escalating as well and nuking American naval forces and bases in the west pacific, knowing America’s overwhelming strategic nuclear force is nullified because the US would not dare to escalate by nuking targets in China proper.

So Russia is not nearly as much at china’s mercy as the west would like to imagine if the relationship between the west and Russia remains in the currently state.     The choice before Russia is not back down totally before the west or be china’s bitch.  Rather it is Russia can give China instant nuclear parity with the US, in addition to limitless natural resources.  How much will China pay?
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
No what he's doing right now panicking because he's realized he's screwed Russia's economy over and now begging China to bail him out and President Xi's happy with having his own pet world leader of course this alliance is built a house of cards by two power-hungry egomaniacs and thus is doomed from the start.
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
(April 2, 2022 at 8:03 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: The western sanction will not end just because Ukrainian war ended.   It is clear Putin has already written off removal of the sanctions as an attainable objective.  

He also clearly is taking EU’s word that it will reduce reliance on Russian gas by 2/3 this year, and have concluded there is no really long term revenue stream potential from European gas sales anyway.  So he can make the most out of the gas that Russian still has to deliver,  not by trying to enhance and draw out the remaining revenue stream, but by using it as a lever to squeeze the EU in the short run to maximize acute pain to force  short term political concessions out of the most gas dependent EU states at the some expense of the remaining revenue stream.

If one looks at the fates the US allowed to descent on autocrats who succumbed to our bidding, such as Hussein and kaddhafi, there is nothing in it for Putin or Russia to not play the hardest possible ball with the west, particularly the US.    At this point, Russia probably feels that given the sanction will not be lifted in the foreseeable future,  Russia can get a much better deal from China, particularly if the US and EU continue to play hard ball with China in west pacific.    So long as the US play hardball with China, and the EU follows along, Putin has plenty of bargaining power over China.

For one thing, right now Chinese nuclear arsenal is minuscule compare to those of Russia and the US.   Regardless of the conventional balance of power over Taiwan, the US could blackmail china out of any thoughts of seizing Taiwan by force by simply implying the US will go nuclear to stop China.    China has no counter to this at all, and won’t for at least 5-10 years, because if China retaliates by using nuclear weapons as well, she would be crushed in the resulting exchange.     By the end of the period when China could build up a really credible nuclear umbrella of her own,  a US led alliance could have made Taiwan impregnable to China.     Putin can immeasurably improve China’s bargaining power and strategic position in the next 5-10 years by offering to extend the Russian nuclear umbrella to cover China. 

If China proper is secured by the Russian nuclear umbrella, then China can freely respond to any american nuclear escalation over Taiwan by escalating as well and nuking American naval forces and bases in the west pacific, knowing America’s overwhelming strategic nuclear force is nullified because the US would not dare to escalate by nuking targets in China proper.

So Russia is not nearly as much at china’s mercy as the west would like to imagine if the relationship between the west and Russia remains in the currently state.     The choice before Russia is not back down totally before the west or be china’s bitch.  Rather it is Russia can give China instant nuclear parity with the US, in addition to limitless natural resources.  How much will China pay?

None of that means deliberately prolonging Russia's war on Ukraine would be a smart strategy on Putin's part, which is what I was discussing.. Don't think he's not very well aware of the role the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan played in the downfall of the USSR.

Also, China has over 300 nukes, including warheads mounted on ICBMs and SLBMs. They do not need Russia's arsenal nearly so much as Russia needs Chinese money.

Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
Same guy who had his joes dig trenches at chernobyl last week? He's playing ten dimensional chess today. Doubtful.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
Russia having a lot of nukes is kind of pointless if they can't keep  lights on. So no Putin is now China's bitch and he has no one to blame but himself.

(April 2, 2022 at 10:39 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Same guy who had his joes dig trenches at chernobyl last week?   He's playing ten dimensional chess today.  Doubtful.
Yeah that was an act of pure genius  Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: Russia and Ukraine
(April 2, 2022 at 10:24 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(April 2, 2022 at 8:03 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: The western sanction will not end just because Ukrainian war ended.   It is clear Putin has already written off removal of the sanctions as an attainable objective.  

He also clearly is taking EU’s word that it will reduce reliance on Russian gas by 2/3 this year, and have concluded there is no really long term revenue stream potential from European gas sales anyway.  So he can make the most out of the gas that Russian still has to deliver,  not by trying to enhance and draw out the remaining revenue stream, but by using it as a lever to squeeze the EU in the short run to maximize acute pain to force  short term political concessions out of the most gas dependent EU states at the some expense of the remaining revenue stream.

If one looks at the fates the US allowed to descent on autocrats who succumbed to our bidding, such as Hussein and kaddhafi, there is nothing in it for Putin or Russia to not play the hardest possible ball with the west, particularly the US.    At this point, Russia probably feels that given the sanction will not be lifted in the foreseeable future,  Russia can get a much better deal from China, particularly if the US and EU continue to play hard ball with China in west pacific.    So long as the US play hardball with China, and the EU follows along, Putin has plenty of bargaining power over China.

For one thing, right now Chinese nuclear arsenal is minuscule compare to those of Russia and the US.   Regardless of the conventional balance of power over Taiwan, the US could blackmail china out of any thoughts of seizing Taiwan by force by simply implying the US will go nuclear to stop China.    China has no counter to this at all, and won’t for at least 5-10 years, because if China retaliates by using nuclear weapons as well, she would be crushed in the resulting exchange.     By the end of the period when China could build up a really credible nuclear umbrella of her own,  a US led alliance could have made Taiwan impregnable to China.     Putin can immeasurably improve China’s bargaining power and strategic position in the next 5-10 years by offering to extend the Russian nuclear umbrella to cover China. 

If China proper is secured by the Russian nuclear umbrella, then China can freely respond to any american nuclear escalation over Taiwan by escalating as well and nuking American naval forces and bases in the west pacific, knowing America’s overwhelming strategic nuclear force is nullified because the US would not dare to escalate by nuking targets in China proper.

So Russia is not nearly as much at china’s mercy as the west would like to imagine if the relationship between the west and Russia remains in the currently state.     The choice before Russia is not back down totally before the west or be china’s bitch.  Rather it is Russia can give China instant nuclear parity with the US, in addition to limitless natural resources.  How much will China pay?

None of that means deliberately prolonging Russia's war on Ukraine would be a smart strategy on Putin's part, which is what I was discussing.. Don't think he's not very well aware of the role the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan played in the downfall of the USSR.

Also, China has over 300 nukes, including warheads mounted on ICBMs and SLBMs. They do not need Russia's arsenal nearly so much as Russia needs Chinese money.


I think as a KGB lieutenant colonel who served through the period,  as well as head of Russian government for 22 years,  Putin likely knows a lot more about the action behind the scene that led to the downfall of the Soviet Union than any historian.   The reason why he would consider prolonging the war is that enables Russia to achieve its primary purpose more decisively, as well as enable Russia to also achieve the secondary purpose.    If the war is stopped in earnest, as opposed to stopped merely for a tactical ceasefire, Russia at most achieve its primary purpose only partially, and if anything receive a setback on its secondary purpose. 

With sanctions essentially in full force and not likely to be slackened if the war is stopped in earnest, Russia now has essentially no incentive to stop the war, especially if the war in Ukraine can be portrayed without too much hyperbole as Russia resisting the persecution of Russia by the US, which was hard to do with the war in Afghanistan. 

China’s 300 warheads are mostly tactical.   Only maybe 50 are on intercontinental ballistic missile that can reach the US.   Their SLBMS are relatively short ranged so they must venture out into open pacific to strike at continental US.  Chinese SSBNs have never conducted a open sea deterrence patrol, nor have their SSNs conducted many long endurance missions much beyond the 1st island chain.   So Chinese ballistic missile submarines’ ability to penetrate US ASW cordon that would certainly be in place during times of high tension, and reach the petrol area suitable for launching a strike on the US,  IS not credible.    So that leaves china with a total of maybe 50 nuclear warheads that can strike continental US compared to 1500 US nuclear warhead that can strike China proper form just US land based ICBM force alone.     So China has no credible ability to resist threat of US nuclear escalation. 

Russia, on the other hand, does.  Which is why she can afford to fight this war in Ukraine in the first place.   So extending Russia’s nuclear umbrella over China is an seismic game changer for the balance of power in the west pacific.    while the Chinese hold a lot of cards, Russia held the ultimate high card in the relationship between the two states.     In fact this card is so high it presents risk just by inserting it into the deck.   So in normal circumstances it would not even be in play.    But circumstances for Russia is not normal, nor its it for China.  So that may well be in play.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  China & Russia Silver 32 3362 November 29, 2023 at 9:46 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  China and Russia's presidents -both- absent from the G20 WinterHold 16 1844 October 1, 2023 at 8:09 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Russia's massive brain drain is ravaging the economy LinuxGal 0 480 September 3, 2023 at 7:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Nato, Sweden, Vilnius, Ukraine etc. Nishant Xavier 53 4435 August 7, 2023 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Proxy war in Ukraine? Angrboda 151 8723 November 8, 2022 at 3:29 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Micheal Cohen lied about Russia Tower deal. Brian37 6 1070 November 29, 2018 at 5:01 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  BREAKING:Trump Promises Strike on Syria and Warns Russia Against Backing Assad WinterHold 20 4586 April 14, 2018 at 10:21 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  We may not be going into WW3 with Russia over Syria after all. Chad32 39 12833 July 16, 2017 at 12:13 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  U.S. War Plane Shoots Down A Syrian Jet: Russia Warns Of Consequences A Theist 40 15330 June 21, 2017 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Michael Flynn, national security adviser, resigns over Russia contacts c172 48 9916 February 18, 2017 at 11:40 am
Last Post: John V



Users browsing this thread: 24 Guest(s)