Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 14, 2011 at 2:13 pm
Quote:You know, in the first centuries since christianity became an official religion, the situation was like this: the Empire there was now an organized religion: priests, bishops, archbishops, etc. whom the people were indeed following blindly. So there was absolutely no need to punish a no-one-cares-for John for believing otherwise.
Er....no. Not even close to reality.
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/dark-age.htm
Scroll down to:
Quote:Three centuries of persecution of the pagans
or, read it all if you wish. Here's a sample:
Quote:375 The temple of Asclepius in Epidaurus, Greece, is closed down by the Christians.
380 On 27th February Christianity becomes the exclusive religion of the Roman Empire by an edict of the Emperor Flavius Theodosius, requiring that:
"All the various nations which are subject to our clemency and moderation should continue in the profession of that religion which was delivered to the Romans by the divine Apostle Peter."
The non-Christians are called “loathsome, heretics, stupid and blind”.
In another edict, Theodosius calls “insane” those that do not believe to the Christian God and outlaws all disagreement with the Church dogmas.
Ambrosius, bishop of Milan, begins the destruction of pagan temples of his area. The Christian priests lead the hungry mob against the temple of goddess Demeter in Eleusis and try to lynch the hierophants Nestorius and Priskus. The 95 year old hierophant Nestorius ends the Eleusinian Mysteries and announces "the predominance of mental darkness over the human race."
381 At the Council of Constantinople the 'Holy Spirit' is declared 'Divine' (thus sanctioning a triune god). On 2nd May, Theodosius deprives of all their rights any Christians who return to the pagan religion. Throughout the Eastern Empire the pagan temples and libraries are looted or burned down. On 21st December, Theodosius outlaws visits to Hellenic temples.
In Constantinople, the Temple of Aphrodite is turned into a brothel and the temples of the Sun and Artemis to stables.
382 “Hellelujah” (“Glory to Yahweh”) is imposed in the Christian mass.
384 Theodosius orders the Praetorian Prefect Maternus Cynegius, a dedicated Christian, to cooperate with local bishops and destroy the temples of the pagans in Northern Greece and Minor Asia.
385 to 388 Prefect Maternus Cynegius, encouraged by his fanatic wife, and bishop 'Saint' Marcellus with his gangs, scour the countryside and sack and destroy hundreds of Hellenic temples, shrines and altars. Among others they destroy the temple of Edessa, the Cabeireion of Imbros, the temple of Zeus in Apamea, the temple of Apollo in Dydima and all the temples of Palmyra.
Thousands of innocent pagans from all sides of the empire suffer martyrdom in the notorious death camps of Skythopolis.
You can't believe the pious horseshit of believers, you know.
Posts: 1127
Threads: 20
Joined: May 11, 2011
Reputation:
14
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 14, 2011 at 2:15 pm
Posts: 471
Threads: 36
Joined: March 10, 2011
Reputation:
7
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 16, 2011 at 10:59 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2011 at 5:21 pm by Zenith.)
Posts: 1994
Threads: 161
Joined: August 17, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 16, 2011 at 9:09 pm
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2011 at 9:11 pm by Justtristo.)
The trinity was definitely not what the first followers of Jesus believed in. They were Jews who saw Jesus as the Messiah and adopted as a "son of god", rather being the second member of the godhead. Likewise the Holy Spirit was seen as just a limb of God.
By the way I have heard that the first 18 verses of the gospel of John (describing Jesus as the word of god) might have been added by scribes after the Gospel was written.
undefined
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 16, 2011 at 10:02 pm
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2011 at 10:05 pm by Minimalist.)
Um, I'm not quite sure what your problem is, Zen. Are you saying that you want to see this in a history book? Because it took me less than 1.5 seconds on Google to find the History of Ammianus Marcellinus in an English translation. You can't get better than a primary source.
http://www.archive.org/stream/romanhisto...a_djvu.txt
It begins in Sec. 208 and continues into 210.
Quote:8. The city which was chosen to witness these fatal
scenes was Scythopolis in Palestine, which for two reasons
seemed the most suitable of all places ; first, because it
was little frequented and secondly, because it was half-
way between Antioch and Alexandria, from which city
many of those brought befogs this tribunal came.
AJ). 359.] NUMEROUS EXECUTIONS. 209
9. One of the first persons accused was Simplicius, the
son of Philip ; a man who, after having been prefect and
consul, was now impeached on the ground that he was
said to have consulted the oracle how to obtain the empire.
He was sentenced to the torture by the express command
of the emperor, who in these cases never erred on the side
of mercy ; but by some special fate he was saved from it,
and with uninjured body was condemned to distant banish-
ment.
10. The next victim was Parnasius, who had been pre-
fect of Egypt, a man of simple manners, but now in danger
of being condemned to death, and glad to escape with
exile : because lojig ago he had been heard to say that
when he left Patrse in Achaia, the place of his birth, with
the view of procuring some high office, he had in a dream
seen himself conducted on his road by several figures in
tragic robes.
11. The next was Andronicus, subsequently celebrated
for his liberal accomplishments and his poetry ; he was
brought before the court without having given any real
ground for suspicion of any kind, and defended himself so
vigorously that he was acquitted.
12. There was also Demetrius, surnamed Chytras, a
philosopher, of great age, but still firm in mind and body ;
he, when charged with having frequently offered sacrifices
in the temple of his oracle, could not deny it ; but affirmed
thai, for the sake of propitiating the deity, he had con-
stantly done so from his early youth, and not with any
idea of aiming at any higher fortune by his questions ; nor
had he known any one who had aimed at such. And
though he was long on the rack he supported it with great
constancy, never varying in his statement, till at length
he was acquitted and allowed to retire to Alexandria, where
he was bom.
13. These and a few others, justice, coming to the aid of
truth, delivered from their imminent dangers. But as
occupations extended more widely, involving numbers
without end in their snares, many perished ; some with
their bodies mangled on the rack ; others were condemned
to death and confiscation of their goods ; while Paulus kept
on inventing groundless accusations, as if he had a store
of lies on which to draw, and suggesting various pretences
210 AMMIANUS MARCELLJXUS. [Ite. XIX. C. xn.
for injuring people, so that on his nod, it may be said,
the safety of every one in the place depended.
Quote:I don't understand you, seriously: some time ago you perfectly agreed with the romans killing christians for getting into religious meetings... And now you say that christians doing likewise to pagans is blatant? By the way, they didn't have "church" buildings to gather there, back then. They gathered where they could.
First off, Pliny made it clear that the secret meetings were regarded as "political" not "religious." The Romans did not give a shit about religion; they were concerned about sedition.
Of greater importance is that you miss the point...perhaps accidentally. I don't give a flying fuck what the emperor did 1500 years ago. He was the emperor and he could kill whoever the fuck he wanted. That's what being emperor means. BUT. When modern xtians trot out this holier-than-thou horseshit about how their marvelous religion spread peacefully across the world it is time to shake them out of their stupidity with FACTS. Xtianity was not spread by pious missionaries but by terror, murder and oppression.
Do you understand that, at least, or am I wasting my time? You made an assertion that the populace was blindly following the bishops and priests and it is simply untrue in many instances.
Posts: 49
Threads: 1
Joined: June 16, 2011
Reputation:
0
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 17, 2011 at 1:46 am
The sad thing for me about the blind rejection of the Trinity is that without appreciating how God is simultaneously one and three, there is no way to begin to understand the process of involution, unity into diversity, or the creation of the universe.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 17, 2011 at 2:14 am
If it's bullshit, it is not worth knowing or wasting time considering.
Your task, and others of your ilk, is to show that it is real instead of merely asserting that you believe it.
Belief may count for something where you come from but around here it isn't worth shit.
Posts: 49
Threads: 1
Joined: June 16, 2011
Reputation:
0
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 17, 2011 at 2:24 am
(June 17, 2011 at 2:14 am)Minimalist Wrote: If it's bullshit, it is not worth knowing or wasting time considering.
Your task, and others of your ilk, is to show that it is real instead of merely asserting that you believe it.
Belief may count for something where you come from but around here it isn't worth shit.
It isn't a matter of belief but of being open minded. For example understanding the basics of the Trinity is what allows a person to comprehend the skeleton of the triune universe. We are used to examining the universe from a dualistic perspective normal for science. We are used to accepting the Law of the Excluded Middle (duality) as all there is to it. Yet now some are becoming aware of the Law of the Included Middle" (three forces) which opens a person to a new perspective.
Posts: 69246
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 18, 2011 at 3:25 am
Quote:It isn't a matter of belief but of being open minded.
I cannot disagree more. Accepting lunacy because it is written in an old book....and actually, it isn't written in the old book it was hashed out centuries later...and then calling yourself "open-minded" is little more than chutzpah.
Be careful you are not so open minded that your brain falls out.
Posts: 4068
Threads: 162
Joined: September 14, 2010
Reputation:
95
RE: Trinity Nonsense
June 18, 2011 at 4:09 am
(June 18, 2011 at 3:25 am)Minimalist Wrote: Be careful you are not so open minded that your brain falls out.
On the other hand, if you're too close-minded, then your brain could suffocate and die from not getting enough oxygen.
|