Of course his presidency is built on lies, that was one of the main reasons for voting for him. We just had a certain expectation for what the lies were and he delivered. Kelly just needs to get the stick out of her ass and accept the age of Trump, he may win a 2nd term but who cares. As long as it ain't Hillary

(August 4, 2017 at 1:21 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: Of course his presidency is built on lies, that was one of the main reasons for voting for him. We just had a certain expectation for what the lies were and he delivered. Kelly just needs to get the stick out of her ass and accept the age of Trump, he may win a 2nd term but who cares. As long as it ain't Hillary

If Kelly gets the stick out of her ass, Trump will be in for a hell of a surprise with regard to his trans- military ban.

There's a little vision of Trumptard reality for you!

(August 4, 2017 at 1:29 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote:

(August 4, 2017 at 1:21 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: Of course his presidency is built on lies, that was one of the main reasons for voting for him. We just had a certain expectation for what the lies were and he delivered. Kelly just needs to get the stick out of her ass and accept the age of Trump, he may win a 2nd term but who cares. As long as it ain't Hillary

If Kelly gets the stick out of her ass, Trump will be in for a hell of a surprise with regard to his trans- military ban.

As long as he stands by this on the basis that it is temporary I won't care about the ban. Granted their are many reasons for outright banning transexuals from the military to begin with but I will give both parties the fair share at their claims. The amount of mental health issues in the transexual community is worrying but the GOP's hatred toward transexuals is also a whole other dilemma not helping anybody. 

We all have the right to screw, fuck, fondle, discipline and have pretend rape with whoever we want as long as both parties say yes. BUT when it comes to the military it is a whole other ball game.

I just want to see transexuals serve and see the statistics behind it. Both outcomes would not surprise me honestly. I say that because I would doubt many transexuals would even want to serve in the armed forces and for those that do I am sure they feel or acknowledge they are competent enough to do so. Homosexuals proved otherwise and the operate fine as soldiers but at the same time they do not have the baggage that transexuals do.

---

(August 4, 2017 at 1:34 pm)Minimalist Wrote: There's a little vision of Trumptard reality for you!

Says the progressive loser typing on his armchair. I notice you are such a sniveling coward you no longer quote my posts so they show on my alerts. Says a lot about your lack of character.

They do serve, and the stats do exist.  That' one of the many reasons it's a dumbass idea on a fundamental level, and the only reason to "ban" them, a practical impossibility, think it through..... is pandering to bigots.

No reason to put lipstick on a pig, Meow. Consistent obstinancy, even temporary, supporting an abjectly bad idea....is not a virtue, it's an irreparable flaw.

(August 4, 2017 at 3:54 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

(August 4, 2017 at 1:42 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: Says the progressive loser typing on his armchair. I notice you are such a sniveling coward you no longer quote my posts so they show on my alerts. Says a lot about your lack of character.

Hey, fucktard...do you really think you are important enough to be quoted?  I'll make you a deal.  The day I give a flying fuck what you or any other racist drumpfuck thinks I will send you a PM telling you.










Today is not that day so don't hold your fucking breath.

Why do you presume I am racist? I am a black man living in a black/Asian neighborhood. You seem to be stupider than you look. You presumed I was some white hillbilly living in the boondocks lol.

I can have reasonable conversations with anybody, my best friend is a socialist and I acknowledge him all the time for his opinions because he makes rational competent decisions. He is also a theist and this does not bother me.

You on the other hand are a bigot and intolerant of anybody's views yet want to profess otherwise. You are factually a bigot and a racist as you have proven earlier. You make atheism a political religion and will disacknowledge anybody because they differ from you. You need to grow up and act like you are at least 16 at the very minimum. I would aim for 30 but that may be asking for too much if you are sincere about what you are.

If you wish to have an adult conversation with me, I am welcome but trolling up and down my way is not going to prove anything but your idiocy. Being an idiot is a choice by the way so choose otherwise buddy.

---

(August 4, 2017 at 1:44 pm)Khemikal Wrote: They do serve, and the stats do exist.  That' one of the many reasons it's a dumbass idea on a fundamental level, and the only reason to "ban" them, a practical impossibility, think it through..... is pandering to bigots.

No reason to put lipstick on a pig, Meow.  Consistent obstinancy, even temporary, supporting an abjectly bad idea....is not a virtue, it's an irreparable flaw.

You have peaked my interest because I have never found any credible statistic or any of that matter. I know they do serve but I am clueless about the capacity at which they do. I know a couple thousand do serve but at the same time I am wondering about how do they house them or even how are they treated. I say this because if you have people identifying as a different gender then this would obviously confuse the "righteous warriors of Jesus" pricks in the military. Atheists have had many issues in the armed forces do to so many superior officers being of this type. 

I know the military is a shit-show in the US but I am unable to do as much research at the moment due to summer classes. So I apologize if I am a few months behind on the latest and greatest news at the moment

The stats are already linked in a thread on these boards specifically about that subject, and would be available had you ever chosen to google them. You;d be surprised at how few..or how differently, the "righteous warriors of jesus" are expressed in the rank and file. I never had trouble as an atheist in the service....my unit had more than a couple pagans, and a surprising number of muslims......but, we were combat arms. The dregs of the military. The upper social and cultural strata generally angle for better jobs, lol.

There's a culture, in the service..of mooting all of that shit in favor of competency. We sing about the red right hand of our ranger god, not jesus. Though, I suppose that jesus is the ranger god to jesus joes, allah to muslim militants, and....cold steel and death itself...to guys like me. You really....really, cant trust what interested civilians and politicians frame as military culture or what would "bother soldiers and hurt their military readiness". It's nothing like what people have been told or would expect. It;s a lowest common denominator thing, a race to the bottom, any idiot or cripple can do this - what's wrong with you, a "your differences are meaningless and stuff it or be punished" ethos. They take people with ideologies and turn them into cogs who kill.

Wearing a floral dress or battle dress, one infantryman is as lethal as any other.

Are we really expected to believe that..somehow, the fear of there being a transsexual...somewhere...in their unit, would keep a critical joe awake at night and hurt his combat effectiveness?