Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 14, 2024, 2:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 6:40 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Can you see in infrared?  Can you make sense of infrared camera data provided to you?

If by infrared camera data you mean raw infrared information, no, I don't believe we can see it. But if that information is watered down and translated into something that our eyes and brain can perceive, then yes. Also yes, I can see your post. What I don't see are the 0's and 1's behind it because of abstraction. Its been translated into something easier to perceive and comprehend. Similar to infrared.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 6:14 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(August 6, 2019 at 6:06 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: I merely stated a fact.  Our brains are capable of processing information, even otherwise “visual” information far in excess of what our actual eyes can actually see.

This is an example of there being no parity between what visual cues we can contemplate and process, and what visual cues our eyes provide.

Ok so we're clear that we're comparing the components within an organism. We're not making cross-species comparisons.

Now, and hopefully this doesn't instigate another rabbit hole rant, but I'm going to ask you for evidence. The reason being, is that it seems difficult to measure how much visual information the brain can handle, without a way to present that visual information to the brain. At least not through the eyes since your claim is that they are insufficient to present it.

Maybe I lack the creativity to come up with a way to make such a measurement, so please show me how it was done.

Oh, FFS. 

Please explain why it might be that we know species that loose eyes? Can you explain that? After all, you are the person claiming that it can't be possible.  You are the one claiming that evolution must be ever upward towards some ethereal goal. Just you alone. So kindly explain why it is that evolution has removed eyes for certain creatures? They had eyes millions of years ago and now they don't.  Why? Can you explain that in your terms? Of course not.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
Then there you have it, John. Your brain is capable of understanding things beyond your eyes ability to detect.

Your eyes see shit your brain gets wrong, too.

Next question.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 6:58 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Oh, FFS. 

"You are the one claiming that evolution must be ever upward towards some ethereal goal."

I'll explain that claim if I ever decide to make it. So stay tuned Professor.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
You know this thread exists, right, for anyone to quote you having made these claims.

Is your brain malfunctioning here, even though your eyes could see those claims as well as ours?

I’m starting to think that, in your minds eye... things were going to go some other way here.

How did that pan out?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 6:47 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(August 6, 2019 at 6:40 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Can you see in infrared?  Can you make sense of infrared camera data provided to you?

If by infrared camera data you mean raw infrared information, no, I don't believe we can see it. But if that information is watered down and translated into something that our eyes and brain can perceive, then yes. Also yes, I can see your post. What I don't see are the 0's and 1's behind it because of abstraction. Its been translated into something easier to perceive and comprehend. Similar to infrared.

Snakes can. Why can we not? Surely not because we are, according to you, the pinnacle of evolution, right? No way any other thing could have acquired the ability to sense the infra-red, right?

Except snakes do exactly that. Thus we are all of us sensorially inferior to snakes. Oh and before you go there, snakes can't talk. Get over it.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 7:00 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Then there you have it, John.  Your brain is capable of understanding things beyond your eyes ability to detect.

Your  eyes see shit your brain gets wrong, too.

Next question.

Ah, right lol. You're under the impression that our brains can perceive infrared? No lol, again, that information is till being funneled through your eyes not around them.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
My eyes don’t see infrared. Do yours?

Should we scramble the sentinels while the mutant threat can still be contained?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 7:03 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: You know this thread exists, right, for anyone to quote you having made these claims.

Is your brain malfunctioning here, even though your eyes could see those claims as well as ours?

I’m starting to think that, in your minds eye... things were going to go some other way here.

How did that pan out?

Yup, so quote me.
Reply
RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
(August 6, 2019 at 7:01 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:
(August 6, 2019 at 6:58 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Oh, FFS. 

"You are the one claiming that evolution must be ever upward towards some ethereal goal."

I'll explain that claim if I ever decide to make it. So stay tuned Professor.

Once again, I am not  a professor. How stupid are you?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Chemical evolution of amino acids and proteins ? Impossible !! Otangelo 56 10770 January 10, 2020 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Richard Dawkins claims we should eat lab-grown human meat Alexmahone 83 12842 March 18, 2018 at 6:47 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Theory of Evolution, Atheism, and Homophobia. RayOfLight 31 5738 October 25, 2017 at 9:24 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Evolution and the Texas Sharp Shooter Fallacy Clueless Morgan 12 2641 July 9, 2015 at 10:17 am
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  生物学101:Genetics and Evolution. Duke Guilmon 2 2249 March 14, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Last Post: Dystopia
  Death and Evolution Exian 4 2071 November 2, 2014 at 11:45 am
Last Post: abaris
  Myths and misconceptions about evolution - Alex Gendler Gooders1002 2 2141 July 8, 2013 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Tonus
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 32375 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Evolution, the Bible, and the 3.5 Million Dollar Violin - my article Jeffonthenet 99 59059 September 4, 2012 at 11:50 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  difference between Micro and macro evolution Gooders1002 21 9636 May 19, 2012 at 12:27 am
Last Post: Polaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)