Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 6:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Free Will Debate
#71
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 11:27 am)polymath257 Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 11:18 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: the question seems to me to be, can something be sufficiently different in your brain to have caused you to make different decision, without that difference being directly traceably to an earlier difference that had already existed outside your brain? 

if not, then no decision really originated in your brain.   it is just first perceived by you as a difference in your brain.

Why would that be desirable? I *want* my decisions to be based on my experiences (outside events affecting me). It would be exceedingly strange if they were not.

Most likely, that small difference in my brain that 'decided' is the result great number of previous events, both inside and outside of my brain. No single one of them would be enough for a different decision, most likely. Those previous influences had to come together to affect the activity of my brain for the decision to happen.

In other words, both external and internal events affect my decisions. Duh.


I make no judgements regarding whether that is desirable.  I only ask whether that could be true.

regarding both external and internal events affect your decision. does the doc-called internal event truly have any significant freedom to transpire differently resulting in different decisions if all external events remain the same? if not, then there is no real internal events, only intermediate effects of external events.

it is possible the brain magnifies the chaotic nature of how decision responds to subtle changes to external events. but other things can also magnify the chaotic nature of how effects of external events impinges on your brain. Also, a macroscopic chaotic system is still in most cases essentially deterministic.
Reply
#72
RE: Free Will Debate
Not necessarily uncaused (alot of people believed that it was a gift from the gods). More that it was a potent and primary cause unto itself, meaningfully and fundamentally separate from the mundane types of causal chains involved in trees falling down or animals acting on instinct.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#73
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 12:01 pm)polymath257 Wrote: It seems that people frame 'free will' in a way that requires it to be an 'uncaused cause'. Is that seriously what people mean by 'free will'?

(November 27, 2021 at 12:01 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It is will, just not a free will.

So, once again, what is the significance of the adjective 'free' in this context? The decision was 'made by me' in that the *decision* was an event in *my* brain. I based that decision on my experiences, desires, thoughts, etc. How is that *not* free?


what meaning is there in “made by me” if there is no possibility of your making a different decision under each circumstance?
Reply
#74
RE: Free Will Debate
And to answer that explicitly, it's not free in all of the ways that any bit of biology isn't free. Our alleged free will was supposed to be the thing we possessed which set us apart from all of that. It isn't, it doesn't, there's no evidence we possess it, but that was what it was supposed to be.

The evergreen criticism of compatibilist free will of any kind is that it's propositionally and evidentiarily interchangeable with no free will at all.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#75
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 12:06 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 11:27 am)polymath257 Wrote: Why would that be desirable? I *want* my decisions to be based on my experiences (outside events affecting me). It would be exceedingly strange if they were not.

Most likely, that small difference in my brain that 'decided' is the result great number of previous events, both inside and outside of my brain. No single one of them would be enough for a different decision, most likely. Those previous influences had to come together to affect the activity of my brain for the decision to happen.

In other words, both external and internal events affect my decisions. Duh.


I make no judgements regarding whether that is desirable.  I only ask whether that could be true.

regarding both external and internal events affect your decision.   does the doc-called internal event truly have any significant freedom to transpire differently resulting in different decisions if all external events remain the same?   if not, then there is no real internal events, only intermediate effects of external events.

it is possible the brain magnifies the chaotic nature of how decision responds to subtle changes to external events.   but other things can also magnify the chaotic nature of how effects of external events impinges on your brain.   Also, a macroscopic chaotic system is still in most cases essentially deterministic.

I *all* external events were *exactly* the same, including *all* events prior to my conception, and *all* events leading up to that decision, then no, I don't think I would make a different decision: I would be exactly the same, with the same desires and beliefs, same opportunities, and same prejudices, and so would *expect* to make the same decision.

If I *could* make a different decision, that would seem quite strange given I would be exactly the same either way.

(November 27, 2021 at 12:15 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 12:01 pm)polymath257 Wrote: It seems that people frame 'free will' in a way that requires it to be an 'uncaused cause'. Is that seriously what people mean by 'free will'?


So, once again, what is the significance of the adjective 'free' in this context? The decision was 'made by me' in that the *decision* was an event in *my* brain. I based that decision on my experiences, desires, thoughts, etc. How is that *not* free?


what meaning is there in “made by me” if there is no possibility of your making a different decision under each circumstance?

That the significant information processing occurred in my brain. In other words, by me.

Once again, is the definition of 'free will' such that it requires the decision be an uncaused cause?
Reply
#76
RE: Free Will Debate
Free will was that "seem strange".
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#77
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 12:25 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Free will was that "seem strange".

Why would I make a different decision if *I* am exactly the same and *everything* else is also exactly the same?
Reply
#78
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 12:24 pm)polymath257 Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 12:06 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: I make no judgements regarding whether that is desirable.  I only ask whether that could be true.

regarding both external and internal events affect your decision.   does the doc-called internal event truly have any significant freedom to transpire differently resulting in different decisions if all external events remain the same?   if not, then there is no real internal events, only intermediate effects of external events.

it is possible the brain magnifies the chaotic nature of how decision responds to subtle changes to external events.   but other things can also magnify the chaotic nature of how effects of external events impinges on your brain.   Also, a macroscopic chaotic system is still in most cases essentially deterministic.

I *all* external events were *exactly* the same, including *all* events prior to my conception, and *all* events leading up to that decision, then no, I don't think I would make a different decision: I would be exactly the same, with the same desires and beliefs, same opportunities, and same prejudices, and so would *expect* to make the same decision.

If I *could* make a different decision, that would seem quite strange given I would be exactly the same either way.

(November 27, 2021 at 12:15 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: what meaning is there in “made by me” if there is no possibility of your making a different decision under each circumstance?

That the significant information processing occurred in my brain. In other words, by me.

Once again, is the definition of 'free will' such that it requires the decision be an uncaused cause?


That does seem to go the essence of “will”.   Otherwise there seem to fundamentally be no will, much less free will.    There is only belated internal perception that an externally initiated process, long underway along a pre-determined trajectory, is nearing an specific type of intermediate point to which we assign arbitrary but ultimately unwarranted significance.
Reply
#79
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 12:28 pm)polymath257 Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 12:25 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Free will was that "seem strange".

Why would I make a different decision if *I* am exactly the same and *everything* else is also exactly the same?

I have no idea, it's a good question.  Nevertheless, instrumental to the concept of a free will..as opposed to a local will, or just a will - fullstop.....is the idea that we are meaningfully outside of the clockwork universe. That, even if you were the same, and all things were the same, the issue of choosing a or b fundamentally hinges on a you free of that empowered to and capable of going down either causal path.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#80
RE: Free Will Debate
(November 27, 2021 at 1:12 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 12:28 pm)polymath257 Wrote: Why would I make a different decision if *I* am exactly the same and *everything* else is also exactly the same?

I have no idea, it's a good question.  Nevertheless, instrumental to the concept of a free will..as opposed to a local will, or just a will - fullstop.....is the idea that we are meaningfully outside of the clockwork universe.  That, even if you were the same, and all things were the same, the issue of choosing a or b fundamentally hinges on a you free of that empowered to and capable of going down either causal path.

The conflict between the apparent ultimate impossibility of the existence of any will on the one hand, and the apparent benefit of assigning responsibility based on pretension of the existence of a free will on the other, require much more sophisticated assessment than it seems to generally be given.

(November 27, 2021 at 12:28 pm)polymath257 Wrote:
(November 27, 2021 at 12:25 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Free will was that "seem strange".

Why would I make a different decision if *I* am exactly the same and *everything* else is also exactly the same?

The question is not why would you, but could you.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Debate Invitation John 6IX Breezy 3 669 September 1, 2019 at 2:05 pm
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
Thumbs Up VOTE HERE: Final four questions for the Christian Debate vulcanlogician 43 4440 May 18, 2018 at 10:23 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  1st Call for Christian Only Debate: Our Role on AF Neo-Scholastic 132 16732 May 4, 2018 at 12:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Definitive Post On The Free Will v. Determinism Debate BrianSoddingBoru4 17 3203 September 3, 2016 at 11:20 pm
Last Post: Arkilogue
  Debate Challenge TruthisGod 127 19536 November 20, 2015 at 2:13 am
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Hello, Anyone interested in a debate? Anima 355 78164 July 8, 2015 at 4:43 pm
Last Post: Anima
  Moral realism vs moral anti-realism debate is a moot point Pizza 1 1033 March 7, 2015 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty. Esquilax 169 30607 November 16, 2014 at 2:43 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Can you help me debate better? Doggey75 20 3754 April 2, 2014 at 8:37 pm
Last Post: psychoslice
  Philosophical help with a Christian debate paulhe 25 7580 September 22, 2013 at 9:08 pm
Last Post: Faith No More



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)