(December 11, 2014 at 6:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Yes. It is contrary to the natural order, since the defining desires of homosexuality are directed away from the proper use of human sexuality.

Which would be only for reproductive purposes. But I have news for you, that's not a human trait. And still, there's gayness in the animal kingdom too. The Bonobos for example, some of our closests relatives, fuck indiscriminately.

Are you allowed to put up thinly veiled hate messages on billboards then?

What century are we living in again, jeez.

Pretty terrible at covering up your blatant homophobia with poppycock arguments Chad, I'm disgusted.

(December 11, 2014 at 6:09 pm)Jenny A Wrote: As far as I know, gay men are just as capable of fathering children as straight men. The system seems quite sufficient. Are natural bachelors deficient?

Or men born sterile?
Or is that a choice too?

(December 11, 2014 at 6:10 pm)robvalue Wrote: Are you allowed to put up thinly veiled hate messages on billboards then?

What century are we living in again, jeez.

Hate message? You don't get the message. It's about lending a hand to the so called gay community, which isn't actually gay without even knowing it.

(December 11, 2014 at 6:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:

(December 11, 2014 at 5:55 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Being homosexual is a deficiency?

Yes. It is contrary to the natural order, since the defining desires of homosexuality are directed away from the proper use of human sexuality.

Actually, there appears to be an evolutionary component to homosexuality.

Af course, if it wasn't natural it wouldn't occur in nature and would be a purely human activity.

But it's not.

(December 11, 2014 at 6:10 pm)robvalue Wrote: Are you allowed to put up thinly veiled hate messages on billboards then?

What century are we living in again, jeez.

Pretty terrible at covering up your blatant homophobia with poppycock arguments Chad, I'm disgusted.

Well, yes actually, we are allowed to up even unveiled hate on billboards.

(December 11, 2014 at 6:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:

(December 11, 2014 at 5:55 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Being homosexual is a deficiency?

Yes. It is contrary to the natural order, since the defining desires of homosexuality are directed away from the proper use of human sexuality.

So you would object to a pretty young thing offering to blow you or offering anal because it's not a 'proper' use of human sexuality? Or are we making distinctions between boy and girl mouths and anuses?

(December 11, 2014 at 6:17 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:

(December 11, 2014 at 6:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Yes. It is contrary to the natural order, since the defining desires of homosexuality are directed away from the proper use of human sexuality.

So you would object to a pretty young thing offering to blow you or offering anal because it's not a 'proper' use of human sexuality? Or are we making distinctions between boy and girl mouths and anuses?

Or the rhythm method or *gasp* have sex after menopause.

(December 11, 2014 at 6:06 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: How can something that occurs naturally be against nature?

Sounds like you're playing with words to be obtuse. All living things tend to a final end. The final end of an acorn is to produce a mature oak capable of bearing fruit. Anyone can see that if the acorn lands on hard ground or otherwise circumstances, then it does not realize realize its potential. In the same way a normal human being has fully functioning senses. That some people are deaf does not change the fact that human beings are intended to have hearing. This includes having natural desires for the things that are naturally beneficial (healthy reproduction) and being disgusted by things that are detrimental (sodomy).

Sounds like you're presupposing intent to be obtuse.