Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 3:21 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The year of whose lord?
#1
The year of whose lord?
My son and I were watching a documentary about the history of Greece. He's really into that sort of thing right now. He asked me what B.C. and A.D. meant.

When I told him, he got really angry. I don't blame him!

I read the wiki page about A.D. and B.C., and it's just bullshit. Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, everyone is currently living in "The year of our lord" 2012??? Seriously?!

That's why I love my kids, because before he asked, I wasn't mad about it. It was just something I sort of accepted. Now my wheels are turning.

Does this piss off anyone else? I mean, I'm not exactly up in arms about it, but it's fucking annoying to me.
42

Reply
#2
RE: The year of whose lord?
All calendars are dating conventions, Alei. The Jews claim that it is the year 5772...which would put them back in the 4th millenium BC which is just horseshit. Oddly, the Jews then write 5772 in Arabic numbers which ought to piss someone off!

As far as the bullshit calendar of the xtians goes, my only complaint is that the assholes even got that wrong. Dionysius Exiguus ( Dennis the short.... I think the other monks were making fun of his dick) messed up by 5 years. It should really be 2017 but the asswipe forgot the 4 years that Augustus ruled as Octavian Caesar and he forgot the year "0."
Reply
#3
RE: The year of whose lord?
@Min,plus nobody actually knows when Jesus was born*.The most common ESTIMATES vary between 4 and 7 BCE.


*assuming he existed at all.
Reply
#4
RE: The year of whose lord?
Is there any conventional dating system that makes sense?
42

Reply
#5
RE: The year of whose lord?
Not that I know of.

@ Pad. Of course. It's faulty math based on faulty myth.
Reply
#6
RE: The year of whose lord?
The oldest calendar in the world, is the Yoruba calendar, from Southwestern Nigeria, the current year is 10,054, New Year's Day was June 4th

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_calendar
Reply
#7
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 22, 2012 at 8:38 pm)cratehorus Wrote: The oldest calendar in the world, is the Yoruba calendar, from Southwestern Nigeria, the current year is 10,054, New Year's Day was June 4th

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_calendar

Thanks for sharing this. This is really, really interesting.


Sidenote: Has anyone seen the documentary Tree of Iron?
[Image: SigBarSping_zpscd7e35e1.png]
Reply
#8
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 22, 2012 at 7:37 pm)aleialoura Wrote: My son and I were watching a documentary about the history of Greece. He's really into that sort of thing right now. He asked me what B.C. and A.D. meant.

When I told him, he got really angry. I don't blame him!

I read the wiki page about A.D. and B.C., and it's just bullshit. Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Atheists, everyone is currently living in "The year of our lord" 2012??? Seriously?!

That's why I love my kids, because before he asked, I wasn't mad about it. It was just something I sort of accepted. Now my wheels are turning.

Does this piss off anyone else? I mean, I'm not exactly up in arms about it, but it's fucking annoying to me.

That is why you people have changed it to "Common Era and Before the Common Era." CE and BCE which corresponds to the exact dates known now.

BTW
We know Christ to have been born between 4 and 6 BC because Herod the Great died in 4 BC. That means the monk or preist who set this time table got the math wrong to begin with. Even so if one is still using BC or AD it denotes their faith in God. So either you were watching a Christian produced film or you were watching a really old documentry (Pre 2000)
Reply
#9
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 22, 2012 at 7:59 pm)aleialoura Wrote: Is there any conventional dating system that makes sense?

In Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge they set a year Zero, which could be said to be accurate, but actually no system is accurate, even the actual time on the world differs from that produced by atomic clocks because of variations in the orbit of the earth, we live in a relative universe after all. The ancient Roman calendar was so inaccurate it is impossible to accurately date anything before the Julian or was it Gregorian calender came in, also there were riots in England, in the eighteenth century when the calender changed and people didn't like the idea of loosing ten days.That change did not happen in Eastern Europe as the orthodox church does not use the popes calender. In the French revolution they set up a calender with a year of !000 days a month of 100 days and a week of ten days but it was useless because it did not match the seasons.

Also Arabic numbers are the numbers we all use and they originated in Hindu India, not with the Arabs.

Actually I don't worry about AD/BC. Think of it this way its history, once people were forced to think made up things that were unsubstantiated, and now we have grown out of it. What better place for a bit of history to be stuck into than a calender.
Also July is named after Julius Caesar, August Named after Augustus Caesar. Incidentally these emperors wanted long months of 31 days so they robed February which is why it is so short.
The Islamic Calender is set by the moon and is a better system for working out time in tropical countries that do not, or hardly change in day length. The christian calender is set by the sun, so is better at predicting seasons and day length. The Ancient Celts had a reasonable calender which did both, but was complex, similar to what I have been loosely told of the Hindu calender, The ancient Germans had a calender that every so often they stuck an extra month in called Fogmoon. I do not know much about the east.
But whatever way you cut it there will be inconsistencies, leap years, and leap seconds which many computer companies try to get removed as it makes their programming so much more difficult. Also the earth seams to be gradually slowing down, so even if you set up a new way of measuring time over a few thousand years it would become out of kilter, and need rebalancing. So live with the fossils of the past, it shows how time has moved on.
Reply
#10
RE: The year of whose lord?
Quote:We know Christ to have been born between 4 and 6 BC because Herod the Great died in 4 BC.


Oh, but your other gospel shtihead "Luke" puts it after 6 AD ( when Quirinius was governor of Syria.

Another of those contradictions which you guys hate so.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A prediction for the new year zebo-the-fat 14 1917 December 20, 2018 at 7:29 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Jesus as Lord - why is this appealing to so many? KevinM1 307 37941 February 14, 2018 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: polymath257
  The 100-year anniversay of Fatima is coming-up! Jehanne 21 5481 October 13, 2017 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  Brazilian woman has spent years praying to Lord of the Rings doll Cyberman 41 6672 January 8, 2017 at 2:27 pm
Last Post: brewer
  9-year old girl hearing voices of the Devil. Jehanne 103 16588 July 19, 2016 at 3:16 pm
Last Post: account_inactive
  Love the Lord your God with all your heart ? Angrboda 144 26902 June 20, 2016 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: KUSA
  "For the lord thy god is a jealous god among you." Socratic Meth Head 52 10674 June 8, 2016 at 10:10 am
Last Post: RozKek
  That magical time of year again... LadyForCamus 38 10664 March 27, 2016 at 6:25 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Mormon Church Admits Smith Married 14 year old JesusHChrist 15 4460 September 16, 2015 at 3:51 pm
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us..." should we be grateful? Whateverist 325 79025 July 21, 2015 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)