Posts: 3158
Threads: 132
Joined: September 1, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 9:55 pm
(July 22, 2012 at 9:26 pm)Drich Wrote: That is why you people have changed it to "Common Era and Before the Common Era." CE and BCE which corresponds to the exact dates known now.
I see it that way in wiki articles sometimes, and in very few history books, but normally it's the way you people unthought to do it 500 or so years after the deity that you people worship was invented.
Quote:BTW
We know Christ to have been born between 4 and 6 BC because Herod the Great died in 4 BC. That means the monk or preist who set this time table got the math wrong to begin with. Even so if one is still using BC or AD it denotes their faith in God. So either you were watching a Christian produced film or you were watching a really old documentry (Pre 2000)
It was Greeks: Crucible of Civilization, by PBS in 2000. We know absolutely nothing about when/if jesus of Nazareth was born. We know when Herod died because there is a historical record. The fact that you have to use the historical records of other people to surmise when your demigod was born just shows that you don't know anything. You're just guesstimating.
Posts: 1928
Threads: 14
Joined: July 9, 2012
Reputation:
32
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:04 pm
(July 22, 2012 at 9:26 pm)Drich Wrote: That is why you people have changed it to "Common Era and Before the Common Era." CE and BCE which corresponds to the exact dates known now.
I hate this Common era stuff it just covers over the history.
What about Monday Tuesday Wednesday etc do we have to change their names to pretend its al scientific, January feb etc all old gods, are they to go? Stuff it, I cannot be arsed with people who want to pull down the statues of the old order and pretend it never happened. It did and it is there in the history. Christ did not exist and even soon after they had no accurate idea when he was supposed to have existed, between four and eight, or four and six out, or nine or seventy five and nobody noticed a star. Leave it in it tells you something.
Posts: 139
Threads: 2
Joined: July 19, 2012
Reputation:
6
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:05 pm
One way to keep it from pissing you off could be to just think of it as this, AD means after death. Seeing as Xtians are supposed to believe in a Zombie Jesus isn't it a bit moronic to still call it After Death when the fucker supposedly rose from the dead? But anyway, just remember it means after death and be thankful someone who has indirectly caused so much fucking trouble in our world is dead.
"Stop chasing your tail and relax. Jesus is watching you make shit up." Shell B to CliveStaples
(July 21, 2012 at 12:31 am)cato123 Wrote: (July 21, 2012 at 12:22 am)C.W. Sims Wrote: I for one, as a homo, must say that if he was a homo, then he had to have looked fabulous on that cross. Nearly naked, body all ripped, oh wait.... yeah, never mind. I'm gonna just stop right there before I offend anyone. 
I have a certain distaste for the emoticons, and particularly despise the laughing/rolling dude when used in response to one's own statement, but.....
Holy fuck that was funny! "Nearly naked, body all ripped,....". Oh, fuck me. I'm still laughing but can no longer piss myself since I've emptied the tank.
Posts: 3158
Threads: 132
Joined: September 1, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:09 pm
His mom's lie just got a little out of hand, maybe. It would be nice if the world would just let the poor bastard die already.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:26 pm
If he ever lived.
Posts: 3158
Threads: 132
Joined: September 1, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:32 pm
(July 22, 2012 at 10:26 pm)Minimalist Wrote: If he ever lived.
That's a very big "IF".
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:32 pm
(July 22, 2012 at 9:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:We know Christ to have been born between 4 and 6 BC because Herod the Great died in 4 BC.
Oh, but your other gospel shtihead "Luke" puts it after 6 AD ( when Quirinius was governor of Syria.
Another of those contradictions which you guys hate so.
Book chapter and verse?
Posts: 139
Threads: 2
Joined: July 19, 2012
Reputation:
6
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:37 pm
(July 22, 2012 at 10:32 pm)aleialoura Wrote: That's a very big "IF".
Ain't that the truth!
"Stop chasing your tail and relax. Jesus is watching you make shit up." Shell B to CliveStaples
(July 21, 2012 at 12:31 am)cato123 Wrote: (July 21, 2012 at 12:22 am)C.W. Sims Wrote: I for one, as a homo, must say that if he was a homo, then he had to have looked fabulous on that cross. Nearly naked, body all ripped, oh wait.... yeah, never mind. I'm gonna just stop right there before I offend anyone.
I have a certain distaste for the emoticons, and particularly despise the laughing/rolling dude when used in response to one's own statement, but.....
Holy fuck that was funny! "Nearly naked, body all ripped,....". Oh, fuck me. I'm still laughing but can no longer piss myself since I've emptied the tank.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:37 pm
(July 22, 2012 at 9:55 pm)aleialoura Wrote: I see it that way in wiki articles sometimes, and in very few history books, but normally it's the way you people unthought to do it 500 or so years after the deity that you people worship was invented. ...So?
Quote:It was Greeks: Crucible of Civilization, by PBS in 2000. We know absolutely nothing about when/if jesus of Nazareth was born. We know when Herod died because there is a historical record. The fact that you have to use the historical records of other people to surmise when your demigod was born just shows that you don't know anything. You're just guesstimating.
 when I gave the spread between 6 and 4 BC I thought it was clear that 'we did not know when Christ was born.'
Posts: 3158
Threads: 132
Joined: September 1, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: The year of whose lord?
July 22, 2012 at 10:37 pm
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2012 at 10:42 pm by Erinome.)
Luke 2:1
(July 22, 2012 at 10:37 pm)Drich Wrote: (July 22, 2012 at 9:55 pm)aleialoura Wrote: I see it that way in wiki articles sometimes, and in very few history books, but normally it's the way you people unthought to do it 500 or so years after the deity that you people worship was invented. ...So?
So- you fail.
Quote: when I gave the spread between 6 and 4 BC I thought it was clear that 'we did not know when Christ was born.'
Drich Wrote:We know Christ to have been born between 4 and 6 BC because Herod the Great died in 4 BC. That means the monk or preist who set this time table got the math wrong to begin with. Even so if one is still using BC or AD it denotes their faith in God. So either you were watching a Christian produced film or you were watching a really old documentry (Pre 2000)
Oh, sorry. I thought you said "we know" because you meant "we know". It's good you admit we don't know. Because we don't.
|
