Do you think "necrophilia" can be considered a legit sexual orientation?

[catfish]

I can see a market developing for glory-holed caskets. Any investers interested?

[paulpablo]

Sexual behaviors that range from pedophilia, incest, homosexuality, and necrophilia are found throughout every culture and era. It definitely isn't anything new.

Since nature encompasses EVERYTHING, there is absolutely NOTHING that is unnatural. This term was born out of the human need to find a counterweight to resolve an issue. Black/White, Positive/Negative- these polarized ways of thinking come off as a hindrance especially to the free thinker.

PEDOPHILIA IS (YES) NATURAL. However, not so much in the socially biased sense. As our (America's) expectations for young adults gradually decreased in terms of responsibility (having a job, providing for a family, etc) this was followed by a certain limitation in which they could have children.

Our distant human relatives like the Cro-Magnon and Neaderthals were a nomadic species that tried their best to survive. It was very common for the mother to die from birth complications. Today, from the grace of technology and general human ingenuity, this is no longer an issue. However during those times females were more likely to die prematurely. This had to do with physical limitations i.e. not fast enough or too weak to fight predators, birth complications, etc.



From this, evolution decided to allow females to have a headstart in maturity. If they were to die early, the only way around that problem was to make sure she had the opportunity to copulate and conceive before her unfortunate early demise.

Why else do most young girls develop "crushes" on older men? Why it's more acceptable for a man to marry a younger woman but not the other way around? Why preteen girls look taller than preteen boys? Why they have more proportional, developed physiques than males their age? Their menstrual cycles as early as 12? Coincidence?

If you are a male and are "guilty" for being attracted to younger females, their is no fault in you. In fact, your genealogy is more likely to succeed than males who have reinforced the denial of younger females.

Btw I am not a "pedophile", and I also don't support raping kids...but I don't think we should look down on people who are attracted to younglings. Not every pedophile is a child molester - but also, not every child molester is a pedophile.

In my opinion pedophiles are guys who like girls who are specifically child like, pretty much below the age of 12. Now that's a perversion because it has nothing to do with breeding, there's more chance of impregnating a 16 or 18 year old than a 12 year old. Also I've never heard of a girl speaking about a time when she was sexually involved with an older man as a child with fond memories.
The government has decided that the age of consent where I live is 16, the only situation in which I can imagine I would protest against this is if i met a 15 or 14 year old and I fell in love with her. But that just doesn't happen I don't go into the same social circles as ANY 14 or 15 year olds, they aren't at my work or at my gym and I've never befriended any randomly. I have several female connections who are perfectly legal to fuck.
And I do look down on people who are attracted to "younglings" if the situation just looks wrong to me, guys who specifically go out to try and meet underage girls, i used to be able to spot them a mile away in nightclubs, you actually using the term younglings sounds wrong to me, a bit like something a pedophile would say.

Also just to answer the question, necrophilia is a sexual orientation, if you don't consider it to be one then you're basically having an argument with a dictionary, because the definition of necrophilia is a sexual attraction to corpses, it's sexual orientation.

[catfish]

Don't forget... *They're born that way...

[Something completely different]

Don't forget... *They're born that way...

MORON!!!

The biological explaination for homosexuality is that genes which are responsible high sexdrive increase the possibility of the subject passing genes on through reproduction. Therefor these genes are benifital and and fit into a biological system called evolution. These genes happen to be those which scientists determin to be those responsible for homosexuality.


Can you show how necrophilia is benefitial for a species and ensures that the species can pass it`s genes on more efficiantly?

As it happens, the explaination for most cases of pedophila has been determined to be via psychological factores - (at least from what I read in a study) overattentive parents, being sexualy abused as a child and other such stuff.

Dont write things down which you yourself believe to be facts only because your brain farts them.

[catfish]

Dude, sit back and smoke a joint or something. You're seriously starting to make me worry for your sanity.

But while you're rolling one, could you explain how this doesn't fit your little rant?
"Can you show how homosexuality is benefitial for a species and ensures that the species can pass it`s genes on more efficiantly?"

[Something completely different]

"Can you show how homosexuality is benefitial for a species and ensures that the species can pass it`s genes on more efficiantly?"

I explained it above.

The genes found to be responsible for homosexuality are the genes which are responsible for a hightend sexdrive.

More sex = more potential offspring = more genes being past on.

It is not "homosexuality" which is the benefitial thing when seen from the perspective of a biologist - it`s the gene which can cause homosexuality.

[catfish]

"Can you show how homosexuality is benefitial for a species and ensures that the species can pass it`s genes on more efficiantly?"

I explained it above.

The genes found to be responsible for homosexuality are the genes which are responsible for a hightend sexdrive.

More sex = more potential offspring = more genes being past on.

It is not "homosexuality" which is the benefitial thing when seen from the perspective of a biologist - it`s the gene which can cause homosexuality.

So in other words, you're saying homosexuality has no beneficial reproductive properties and that the "gay gene" that supposedly causes homosexuality increases the chances of passing genes on to a potential human who in effect will make numerous futile attempts to pass that gene on by the act of attempted copulation with a member of the same sex? Obviously that logic has a major flaw, don't you think?

[Something completely different]

So in other words, you're saying homosexuality has no beneficial reproductive properties and that the "gay gene" that supposedly causes homosexuality increases the chances of passing genes on to a potential human who in effect will make numerous futile attempts to pass that gene on by the act of attempted copulation with a member of the same sex? Obviously that logic has a major flaw, don't you think?

I see that it is useless debating anything with you because you seem to eigther be to dumb to understan, or you are deliberatly refusing to understand the concept I presented.

So I will simply post a video in which the concept is presented and explained in a way that even the simplest halfwits will understand it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuK9pxjBwX8

[catfish]

I'm not the dumbass who is claiming that a gene that makes someone gay is beneficial for the propagation of one's own genes.

Please, explain where the "more potential offspring" fits into a homosexual attraction?
More sex = more potential offspring = more genes being past on.

[Darkstar]

I'm not the dumbass who is claiming that a gene that makes someone gay is beneficial for the propagation of one's own genes.

Please, explain where the "more potential offspring" fits into a homosexual attraction?
More sex = more potential offspring = more genes being past on.

I believe this might help clear things up.
http://www.nimbios.org/press/FS_homosexuality
I was going to quote a relevant snippet from the article, but I would end up quoting the whole thing (it's pretty short).