Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 24, 2024, 10:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 1:10 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: I have evidence. The Holy Bible claims to be the record of the person, God, who did it. So it must be considered as possibly the very eye witness of the person God who actually did it.

The bible says that God is real and it's true because God wrote the bible.

Ever hear of circular reasoning?
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 1:56 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 1:55 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You would not. The rules would have to be agreed to by both participants.

Well if I have absolute say over all rules then maybe.

So you want to be able to fix the debate.

DANGER WILL ROBINSON DANGER.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 1:56 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 1:55 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You would not. The rules would have to be agreed to by both participants.

Well if I have absolute say over all rules then maybe.

You are a fucking child. Let me guess, your rules would look something like this:

1) I [Grace] will never have to provide a shred of positive evidence for any of my claims;

2) I may misrepresent my opponent's position;

3) I may misrepresent legitimate science in post after post and will never concede that I am being dishonest or don't know what I'm talking about;

4) I will discount out of hand any evidence presented by my opponent;

5) My opponent must exhaustively explain every aspect of science related to the topic (including showing all calculations) while I will be permitted to appeal to magic as an explanation for everything I don't understand (which is pretty much everything);

6) I get to make shit up as it suits my purposes; and,

7) Regardless of the actual outcome of the debate, I will declare victory.

Is that about right, you miserable troll?
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 1:56 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Well if I have absolute say over all rules then maybe.

Are you fucking kidding me?

Alright, post what rules you'd want, here in this thread, so everyone can see them. If you do that, and everyone can know ahead of time what you want, in your own words, then sure, I'll walk into your bear trap. I'd kinda have to; it isn't as if you've gone to the trouble of baiting it.

My one condition, that I'd like to put out there, is that you actually debate back, without ignoring the things that I say, and without your entire position, walking into the thing, being "I've already won." Treat it like you're presenting your position fresh, to a group that's not heard it before. That okay?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 1:56 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 1:55 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You would not. The rules would have to be agreed to by both participants.

Well if I have absolute say over all rules then maybe.

Now you truly sound like a spoiled child. Congratulations. Clap Clap
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 2:42 pm)Chas Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 1:56 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Well if I have absolute say over all rules then maybe.

Now you truly sound like a spoiled child. Congratulations. Clap Clap

No no, let her post her rules. Let's give her the chance to dig her own grave on this one.

Grace, have at it. Show me what you want, and we'll get something going.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
Can't wait...

PopcornPopcorn
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
Rules:

1: Esquilax must not at any time hint suggest or mention that there may be no god.
2: Esquilax must all times defer to SBGs knowledge and superior education.
3: Esquilax will declare defeat in less than fifteen posts.
4: Esquilax must use the phrase atheistic science instead of science.

Ooh I could go on all night.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 2:46 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 2:42 pm)Chas Wrote: Now you truly sound like a spoiled child. Congratulations. Clap Clap

No no, let her post her rules. Let's give her the chance to dig her own grave on this one.

Grace, have at it. Show me what you want, and we'll get something going.

I will let you know what the rules are as the debate proceeds. Remember I have absolute say over the rules.
Reply
RE: Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)
(October 9, 2013 at 3:00 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: I will let you know what the rules are as the debate proceeds. Remember I have absolute say over the rules.

So... so... so...

We all read that, right?

You want to debate before setting up the rules, without agreement, so you can change them as we go?

That's not really how this works, Grace. We set the rules in stone before we start debating, and then a new thread gets made in the debate area and we have at it. I don't mind you selecting the rules, so long as they're laid out transparently and don't, say, suddenly change mid-stream.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Not sure Stan will show up. Brian37 20 1031 March 3, 2024 at 3:06 am
Last Post: no one
  Debunk the divine origin LinuxGal 35 2414 October 9, 2023 at 7:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The false miracle of Fatima now a movie Foxaèr 17 1756 September 6, 2020 at 2:03 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Can someone show me the evidence of the bullshit bible articles? I believe in Harry Potter 36 4833 November 3, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  World ending on April 23rd, says false prophet Divinity 41 8742 April 27, 2018 at 1:19 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Josh McDowell and the "atheistic" Internet Jehanne 43 6302 February 8, 2018 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Supernatural denial, atheistic hypocrisy? Victory123 56 9723 February 1, 2018 at 10:49 pm
Last Post: polymath257
  Satan, anti-christ, false prophet vorlon13 43 8291 November 14, 2017 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Harry Nevis
  Some questions for you Joz 16 3425 January 29, 2017 at 1:56 pm
Last Post: Athene
  A Simple Way to Shut Up a Street Preacher Jonah 44 28876 August 12, 2016 at 11:25 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)