Now a Hindu Group Wants a Monument at the Oklahoma Capitol

[Polaris]

It's a parody just like Festivus. Where's the logic and reason then? I have yet to see it from you.

Can we just savor the irony of a christian shitting on any other religion for a dearth of logic and reason? Because that it rich like fucking dark chocolate.

Not really when you're talking to American atheists who know jack shit about logic or reason.

Much better than than the Satanists. At least they have a legitimate reason for a display.

...and what would that be?
Their fanciful beliefs are inferior to your fanciful beliefs in what way? Did Satan not have enough burning bushes? Satan didn't demand enough blood sacrifice? Not enough worldwide genocide? Satan didn't execute his own son?

Tell me, what is it about any given religion that makes it "legitimate" enough to be placed in a public forum and paid for by everyone ... even those who worship differently??

Please do enlighten us oh King Stupid.

Oh look. The retard of Atheist Forums who continues to shit on the image of atheists worldwide. Christians can just sit back and read their Bibles because pieces of shit like yourself. I never have to defend my beliefs with you because of your severe lack of secular knowledge.

I'm not Hindu, moron.

Because Satanism is a parody religion. No one actually believes in it; they just use it to mock Christianity. Seeing it as legitimate would be akin to believing the articles from The Onion. I also would give Hinduism more legitimacy than say modern religions like Mormonism and Scientology even though it would be logically fallible to base it's legitimacy on the length of its existence.

Pretty sure when the Roman Emperor banned the other religions, they would assume it was probably not a joke.

And which Roman Emperor was that, Polecat?

Even though paganism began to be banned in certain forms dating back to Constantine the Great (including Gratian and Valentinian II who further distanced the Roman Empire from its pagan roots), Theodosius I brought it to the level of outright persecution.

[EgoRaptor]

Can we just savor the irony of a christian shitting on any other religion for a dearth of logic and reason? Because that it rich like fucking dark chocolate.

Not really when you're talking to American atheists who know jack shit about logic or reason.

...and what would that be?
Their fanciful beliefs are inferior to your fanciful beliefs in what way? Did Satan not have enough burning bushes? Satan didn't demand enough blood sacrifice? Not enough worldwide genocide? Satan didn't execute his own son?

Tell me, what is it about any given religion that makes it "legitimate" enough to be placed in a public forum and paid for by everyone ... even those who worship differently??

Please do enlighten us oh King Stupid.

Oh look. The retard of Atheist Forums who continues to shit on the image of atheists worldwide. Christians can just sit back and read their Bibles because pieces of shit like yourself. I never have to defend my beliefs with you because of your severe lack of secular knowledge.

I'm not Hindu, moron.

Because Satanism is a parody religion. No one actually believes in it; they just use it to mock Christianity.

Bullshit. Satanism is an atheistic philosophy. Satanist do not "believe" in it because no "belief" is necessary to accept a philosophy.

Also, the Church of Satan has kept itself up, without tax exempt status (although I don't know about the Satanic Temple)! So we have more right to a monument than any Christian church.

Honestly, for someone who claims to be a liberal, you sound like Bill O'Riley.

[Polaris]

You do know that you're the most like Bill O'Riley and the rest of those Foxtards with your Zionist horeshit, right?

Since Satanists tend to be pretty much white, I'd think O'Riley would fit right in.

[EgoRaptor]

You do know that you're the most like Bill O'Riley and the rest of those Foxtards with your Zionist horeshit, right?

Since Satanists tend to be pretty much white, I'd think O'Riley would fit right in.

Yes, because all white people are the same.

[Esquilax]

Not really when you're talking to American atheists who know jack shit about logic or reason.

Ooh, you just burned me! I'm certainly steamed up by that sick fire you just lit with your sweeping generalization, provided without evidence or commentary! Ooh yeah!

Not to mention it's entirely factually inaccurate. You aren't talking to an American atheist right now. I'm Australian.

Shit, you really screwed the pooch on that one.

[Minimalist]

Can we just savor the irony of a christian shitting on any other religion for a dearth of logic and reason? Because that it rich like fucking dark chocolate.

Not really when you're talking to American atheists who know jack shit about logic or reason.

...and what would that be?
Their fanciful beliefs are inferior to your fanciful beliefs in what way? Did Satan not have enough burning bushes? Satan didn't demand enough blood sacrifice? Not enough worldwide genocide? Satan didn't execute his own son?

Tell me, what is it about any given religion that makes it "legitimate" enough to be placed in a public forum and paid for by everyone ... even those who worship differently??

Please do enlighten us oh King Stupid.

Oh look. The retard of Atheist Forums who continues to shit on the image of atheists worldwide. Christians can just sit back and read their Bibles because pieces of shit like yourself. I never have to defend my beliefs with you because of your severe lack of secular knowledge.

I'm not Hindu, moron.

Because Satanism is a parody religion. No one actually believes in it; they just use it to mock Christianity. Seeing it as legitimate would be akin to believing the articles from The Onion. I also would give Hinduism more legitimacy than say modern religions like Mormonism and Scientology even though it would be logically fallible to base it's legitimacy on the length of its existence.

And which Roman Emperor was that, Polecat?

Even though paganism began to be banned in certain forms dating back to Constantine the Great (including Gratian and Valentinian II who further distanced the Roman Empire from its pagan roots), Theodosius I brought it to the level of outright persecution.

Correct. But before he did that he cracked down on heretical xtians... heretic in that case being anyone who did not believe as he did.

Which remains pretty much the same definition of "heretic" as we have today.