So you when to hell now what.

[Huggy Bear]

or do you really think I believe a human can fly unassisted?

That's pretty rich coming from a guy believes a guy can summon UFOs from a news video and thinks NDEs prove (his) version of the afterlife.

Let's play a game.

You remember on sesame street where you had to figure out which thing was not like the others?

UFO's - widely documented

NDE's - widely documented

Unassisted human flight - hmm let's see.... Nope, not documented at all you fool.

smh,
you're the weng weng of mental midgets..

[Losty]

So...disingenuous asshole it is then? Well...congrats I suppose.

Draw whatever conclusion you like sweetheart.

The point is, the original question was disingenuous to begin with, or do you really think I believe a human can fly unassisted?

Remove those rose colored glasses.

I think my answer was pretty ingenious btw, FAF has to admit that Blaine actually can technically levitate.

You're a grown man who believes in Fairytales and considers "but she says it's true" to be evidence...I can't be sure what other silly things you might believe.

Also, I like to be called sweetheart. I suppose I can refrain from calling you an asshole in the future

[FatAndFaithless]

The amount of braincells I lost in this thread listening to Huggy is still painful.

[The Valkyrie]

That's pretty rich coming from a guy believes a guy can summon UFOs from a news video and thinks NDEs prove (his) version of the afterlife.

Let's play a game.

You remember on sesame street where you had to figure out which thing was not like the others?

UFO's - widely documented

NDE's - widely documented

Unassisted human flight - hmm let's see.... Nope, not documented at all you fool.

smh,
you're the weng weng of mental midgets..

You appear to be missing the difference between the terms "widely documented" and "widely claimed".

[Huggy Bear]

You appear to be missing the difference between the terms "widely documented" and "widely claimed".

No, widely documented.

For instance, have you ever heard of the term "foo fighters"?

[FatAndFaithless]

Beccs, don't do it...he'll drag the conversation down to his kindergarten level and beat you with experience.

[Huggy Bear]

Beccs, don't do it...he'll drag the conversation down to his kindergarten level and beat you with experience.

*points at sig*
Beating people with facts is good enough....

Although, I'm tempted to quote you in my sig..
http://atheistforums.org/thread-29834-po...#pid813571

My claim was that David Blaine can levitate and fly, and there are videos supporting it.

I admit it's out of context, but still funny.

Foo fighters

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo_fighter

The term foo fighter was used by Allied aircraft pilots in World War II to describe various UFOs or mysterious aerial phenomena seen in the skies over both the European and Pacific theaters of operations.

The first sightings occurred in November 1944, when pilots flying over Germany by night reported seeing fast-moving round glowing objects following their aircraft. The objects were variously described as fiery, and glowing red, white, or orange. Some pilots described them as resembling Christmas tree lights and reported that they seemed to toy with the aircraft, making wild turns before simply vanishing. Pilots and aircrew reported that the objects flew formation with their aircraft and behaved as if under intelligent control, but never displayed hostile behavior. However, they could not be outmaneuvered or shot down. The phenomenon was so widespread that the lights earned a name – in the European Theater of Operations they were often called "kraut fireballs" but for the most part called "foo-fighters". The military took the sightings seriously, suspecting that the mysterious sightings might be secret German weapons, but further investigation revealed that German and Japanese pilots had reported similar sightings.

like I said widely documented.

Are you calling all these fighter/bomber pilots liars?

[robvalue]

Just a little tip, not meant as an insult- you are utterly failing to convince anyone of anything here, so you may want to evaluate why that is and give your methodology some thorough examination. This board is clearly full of highly intelligent people and your arguments are not cutting it.

This goes for a lot of people I see on here, I'm not picking on you. I'm sadly deciding to block more and more people because almost everything they write is horrifically flawed and not even worth the time to look at. Don't fall into the same trap

[Huggy Bear]

Your first mistake is assuming that my purpose is to convince anyone of anything, I haven't started one thread since joining this forum. I'm just supplying information to the uninformed.

[robvalue]

OK. I tried.