Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 2:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ken Ham's ark.
#81
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 11:52 am)dyresand Wrote: By technology you mean wishful thinking?
No, 'gopher wood' is code for carbon nanotube composite.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat? Huh
Reply
#82
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 5:39 pm)JuliaL Wrote:
(January 10, 2015 at 11:52 am)dyresand Wrote: By technology you mean wishful thinking?
No, 'gopher wood' is code for carbon nanotube composite.

So all this time religion was just front for smart people then. Damn... i didn't it said that in the bible.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#83
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 12:07 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(January 10, 2015 at 9:53 am)TubbyTubby Wrote: I'd like to see them when the place is jammed and they have to walk through the section slowly with all us heathens. I'd be so tempted to stand next to them and explain things to my kids loud enough for them to hear, it would be sheer fucking delight to watch them squirm and not be able to get away.

I think you're attributing a level of self awareness and consideration to opposing worldviews to creationists that, a lot of the time, simply isn't there. The attitude that many of them have wouldn't allow for them to get uncomfortable, because to become uncomfortable implies some possibility that their children would find the alternative view on display remotely persuasive, which they couldn't possibly do, because creationism is obviously right. You gotta be really closed off to accept creationism, after all, and you can see that among our creationists here, for which a discussion on the merits of creationism rarely ascends beyond the level of "evolution is a lie!" repeated over and over. Perhaps you've seen that youtube video of the homeschooling creationist mother "auditing" a museum?





This is what we have to deal with. She walks through the entire damn museum with her cameraman, slowly panning over every exhibit, and not once in the entire half hour video does she realize that a derisive snort or a "this is a lie!" assertion is not a valid justification for her views. The information is right there, but it never once penetrates the shield of baseless huffy condescension she has.

I lent my copy of the greatest show on earth to a creationist work colleague a few weeks ago. When he came back from holidays I asked what he thought. He replied that it was wrong. I then asked him how much of it he had read.
The reply? Three pages.

Thinking
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Reply
#84
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 8:31 pm)Zen Badger Wrote:
(January 10, 2015 at 12:07 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I think you're attributing a level of self awareness and consideration to opposing worldviews to creationists that, a lot of the time, simply isn't there. The attitude that many of them have wouldn't allow for them to get uncomfortable, because to become uncomfortable implies some possibility that their children would find the alternative view on display remotely persuasive, which they couldn't possibly do, because creationism is obviously right. You gotta be really closed off to accept creationism, after all, and you can see that among our creationists here, for which a discussion on the merits of creationism rarely ascends beyond the level of "evolution is a lie!" repeated over and over. Perhaps you've seen that youtube video of the homeschooling creationist mother "auditing" a museum?





This is what we have to deal with. She walks through the entire damn museum with her cameraman, slowly panning over every exhibit, and not once in the entire half hour video does she realize that a derisive snort or a "this is a lie!" assertion is not a valid justification for her views. The information is right there, but it never once penetrates the shield of baseless huffy condescension she has.

I lent my copy of the greatest show on earth to a creationist work colleague a few weeks ago. When he came back from holidays I asked what he thought. He replied that it was wrong. I then asked him how much of it he had read.
The reply? Three pages.

Thinking

ROFLOL
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#85
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 5, 2015 at 11:48 am)robvalue Wrote: ... by getting 2 of every animal in there for 40 days?
2 of every unclean animal and 7 of every clean animal.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
#86
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 8:58 pm)IATIA Wrote:
(January 5, 2015 at 11:48 am)robvalue Wrote: ... by getting 2 of every animal in there for 40 days?
2 of every unclean animal and 7 of every clean animal.

But what about the polar bears and penguins... they couldn't have possibly have added those in.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#87
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 9:04 pm)dyresand Wrote:
(January 10, 2015 at 8:58 pm)IATIA Wrote: 2 of every unclean animal and 7 of every clean animal.
But what about the polar bears and penguins... they couldn't have possibly have added those in.
He had a hundred years to "git 'er done"

Check this
creationtips.com Wrote:So the real Ark, using Noah and the help of his family or hired workmen, could have been built in around the same time.
So after the ark was built. "Adios motherfuckers, no room for hired help, now git.".
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
#88
RE: Ken Ham's ark.
(January 10, 2015 at 12:07 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(January 10, 2015 at 9:53 am)TubbyTubby Wrote: I'd like to see them when the place is jammed and they have to walk through the section slowly with all us heathens. I'd be so tempted to stand next to them and explain things to my kids loud enough for them to hear, it would be sheer fucking delight to watch them squirm and not be able to get away.

I think you're attributing a level of self awareness and consideration to opposing worldviews to creationists that, a lot of the time, simply isn't there. The attitude that many of them have wouldn't allow for them to get uncomfortable, because to become uncomfortable implies some possibility that their children would find the alternative view on display remotely persuasive, which they couldn't possibly do, because creationism is obviously right. You gotta be really closed off to accept creationism, after all, and you can see that among our creationists here, for which a discussion on the merits of creationism rarely ascends beyond the level of "evolution is a lie!" repeated over and over. Perhaps you've seen that youtube video of the homeschooling creationist mother "auditing" a museum?





This is what we have to deal with. She walks through the entire damn museum with her cameraman, slowly panning over every exhibit, and not once in the entire half hour video does she realize that a derisive snort or a "this is a lie!" assertion is not a valid justification for her views. The information is right there, but it never once penetrates the shield of baseless huffy condescension she has.


That is one dumb twat.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Aiders of the Lost Ark LinuxGal 1 828 November 26, 2022 at 9:47 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Ham vs. Craig Fake Messiah 22 2385 November 27, 2021 at 11:50 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
Thumbs Down The story of Noah' s Ark - or - God is dumber than you. onlinebiker 75 9180 September 24, 2021 at 5:53 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A question about the crew and passengers on the Ark. Gawdzilla Sama 68 8906 September 16, 2018 at 5:11 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  And Yet, They Work For A Fucktard Like Ham Minimalist 22 3791 July 18, 2017 at 3:50 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Questions about noah ark king krish 210 54496 April 8, 2017 at 6:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The other problems with Noahs ark dyresand 27 5808 April 7, 2017 at 7:40 pm
Last Post: TheoneandonlytrueGod
  Ham Must Be Starting His Presidential Bid Minimalist 30 4398 March 4, 2017 at 3:44 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Washington Post Tries To Help Out Creatards and Ken Ham goes ballistic. Minimalist 12 3444 January 1, 2017 at 11:17 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  The Creationist that Ken Ham calls "stupid" drfuzzy 3 1935 May 7, 2016 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)