Posts: 542
Threads: 95
Joined: August 28, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: The world needs new definitions of terrorism
January 25, 2015 at 7:30 pm
(January 25, 2015 at 7:25 pm)Lao Shizi Wrote: "Why on earth am I a "paranoid asshole"?"
It will take someone who is a professional to answer that question. Way above my pay grade. or you can't explain... too much to explain your own insult ... good work mate
PS if you're about to post a reply and your response is going to be negative, improper, average, odd, obtuse, irrational, an argument, might change the focus, going off at a tangent or just mean ... go and find a maths forum to post on instead, they'll love you !!
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: The world needs new definitions of terrorism
January 25, 2015 at 9:59 pm
(January 24, 2015 at 6:03 pm)lifesagift Wrote: Really?
Yes, really. If you bothered to look facts up before posting out of your ass as usual. Same thing in Europe. I'm not digging up the Europol statistics for you, since they are in the public domain and easily found doing google. Only 2 percent of terrorist attacks in Europe are motivated by religion.
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation:
84
RE: The world needs new definitions of terrorism
January 25, 2015 at 11:10 pm
(January 25, 2015 at 6:57 pm)lifesagift Wrote: (January 25, 2015 at 6:46 pm)Lao Shizi Wrote: "do you believe in democracy? or would you have your daughter dressed in a robe?
How is ISIS a threat to you depends on what you want in life? freedom or religious persecution?"
Um, wut?
I don't think you answered my questions. Any of them. Seek professional help.
Your question like it's important? who are you?
And don't patronise please
Lifes, I swear you come on here, decide to post the most inane crap, and then you get mad when people point out the inanity. Why don't you try coming up with something to post that's, I dunno, important? Relevant? Interesting? Or, even better, why not jump in on other members' threads and discuss things civilly? I get the feeling you're on the internet to start fights, not to actually have discussions.
Posts: 23026
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: The world needs new definitions of terrorism
January 26, 2015 at 12:36 am
(This post was last modified: January 26, 2015 at 1:02 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(January 24, 2015 at 5:25 pm)lifesagift Wrote: in the wake of the apparent obscene murder of a Japanese captive, the Japanese PM says they will never bow to terrorism - isn't it time to redefine "terrorism" as Islamic terrorism?
No. There's plenty of non-Islamic terrorism, too.
<edited, late to the party>
Posts: 67175
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: The world needs new definitions of terrorism
January 26, 2015 at 9:33 am
(This post was last modified: January 26, 2015 at 9:35 am by The Grand Nudger.)
The US's terrorist problem is largely christian and decidedly domestic, though it's being largely christian shouldn't be construed as an indication that christianity was a factor in every terrorist act (though it explicitly is in many). Check the DOJ or the FBI for the stats (and yes, I've looked....the same is true for just about everywhere..if for no other reason than brute force of demographics). What you "feel" is a well reported and well studied tendency for human beings to conceptualize a societal problem in the most recent terms or events available to them, and more particularly in the loudest. They hear about a murder on tv every opther night, and so, when asked, they respond to the question "Whats the biggest problem facing the us today" -"Gun violence". Two weeks later it will be rape, or poverty, or intolerance, or terrorism (or muslim terrorism). It's a selection effect. Jihadists and Islamic terrorists are Johnny-come-lately's (and don't yet belong in the big leagues of terrorism by any sober measure - though I imagine they're making up for lost time brilliantly)....but, because they've come lately, they're fresh on your/our minds.
...and so here you are Life.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 542
Threads: 95
Joined: August 28, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: The world needs new definitions of terrorism
February 14, 2015 at 5:36 pm
(January 25, 2015 at 11:10 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: (January 25, 2015 at 6:57 pm)lifesagift Wrote: Your question like it's important? who are you?
And don't patronise please
Lifes, I swear you come on here, decide to post the most inane crap, and then you get mad when people point out the inanity. Why don't you try coming up with something to post that's, I dunno, important? Relevant? Interesting? Or, even better, why not jump in on other members' threads and discuss things civilly? I get the feeling you're on the internet to start fights, not to actually have discussions.
You're wrong my dear. I have an opinion, as do we all. And I pop in here occasionally and, yes, vent sometimes, but I think I also ask interesting questions. And no, I won't spend hours reading stuff on here and commenting.... unless I choose to.
But the notion that I "post the most inane crap" is a bit unfair, and your opinion too, but inane is not a crime, and therefore should be respected. Shame you don't comment on the true idiots that are rude and disrespectful.
PS if you're about to post a reply and your response is going to be negative, improper, average, odd, obtuse, irrational, an argument, might change the focus, going off at a tangent or just mean ... go and find a maths forum to post on instead, they'll love you !!
|