Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 3:23 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The argument of "chance"
#71
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:
(February 22, 2015 at 2:49 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: Anyone gonna answer this? Wiggy?

You really should change your title to "Feet to the Fire holder". I love the way you are dogged in your questions.
Done.

Now, I want someone to answer the damned question!
Reply
#72
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 21, 2015 at 9:13 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:
(February 21, 2015 at 9:12 pm)Wiggy Wrote: In the beginning there was nothing.

0+0=0

Therefore there must be a creator outside of time and space. Simple really.

Not so simple; now you have to answer the question: where did that creator come from?
The answer is zero. You gotta carry the one and then subtract it.
Reply
#73
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 23, 2015 at 6:41 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:
(February 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: You really should change your title to "Feet to the Fire holder". I love the way you are dogged in your questions.
Done.

Now, I want someone to answer the damned question!

You should also send me a briefcase full of unmarked twenties and fifties.

[Image: 2mdfamh_th.jpg]

just testing.

Reply
#74
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 21, 2015 at 2:35 am)xr34p3rx Wrote:
(February 21, 2015 at 2:08 am)Pizz-atheist Wrote: What argument are you talking about?

the argument where Christians pull a number out of their ass saying "what are the chances of a universe like this existing without a god" or something similar.

Lawrence Krauss said it best nothing is simply unstable and then something exists. Ill bring up a video.


Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#75
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 21, 2015 at 9:01 pm)Wiggy Wrote: On the other hand evilutions are always changing their stories about fossils. Thats why its crap.

That's because the evidence is continuously being updated. New discoveries, new methods, new ways of thinking - the complete opposite of:

Quote:I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.

Taking a conclusion, then conforming everything to fit around that conclusion Dodgy
Reply
#76
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 21, 2015 at 12:55 am)xr34p3rx Wrote: This argument is a bit confusing to me at the moment. Could someone be kind enough to explain it a bit or give a video or link to an article breaking it down.

The best way to explain the argument is to say that creationists are stupid.
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#77
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 23, 2015 at 9:20 pm)Beccs Wrote:
(February 21, 2015 at 12:55 am)xr34p3rx Wrote: This argument is a bit confusing to me at the moment. Could someone be kind enough to explain it a bit or give a video or link to an article breaking it down.

The best way to explain the argument is to say that creationists are stupid.

[Image: 59525957.jpg]
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#78
RE: The argument of "chance"
(February 23, 2015 at 9:15 pm)Helio Nimbus Wrote:
Quote:I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.

Taking a conclusion, then conforming everything to fit around that conclusion Dodgy

That's actually a feature of their manifesto:

Creation.com Wrote:By definition, therefore, no interpretation of facts in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

Gee, I wonder what their conclusions will be? Angel
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#79
RE: The argument of "chance"
Quote:I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.

Without bothering to get something as tiresome as peer review, I'm sure. And by peer review I don't mean other creationist tinfoilers but the actual scientific community.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#80
RE: The argument of "chance"
"Scriptural record" - lol

Whose scripture? Why MINE of course.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance. Nishant Xavier 55 3107 August 6, 2023 at 5:19 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  By chance? Yukon_Jack 438 38235 March 8, 2020 at 11:40 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  A chance to do good without god Baalzebutt 8 3272 February 27, 2013 at 4:26 pm
Last Post: Baalzebutt
  Products of Chance Reasonable_Jeff 44 13602 September 26, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: Darkstar
  Logic of chance Ephrium 59 19986 August 27, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Violet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)