Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 3:40 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
The argument of "chance"

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The argument of "chance"
rexbeccarox Offline
Getting there...
*****
Religious Views: none
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation: 84
#71
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 6:41 pm
(February 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:
(February 22, 2015 at 2:49 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: Anyone gonna answer this? Wiggy?

You really should change your title to "Feet to the Fire holder". I love the way you are dogged in your questions.
Done.

Now, I want someone to answer the damned question!
Find
Reply
The Reality Salesman01 Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views:
Posts: 2082
Threads: 72
Joined: March 12, 2013
Reputation: 44
#72
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 6:45 pm
(February 21, 2015 at 9:13 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:
(February 21, 2015 at 9:12 pm)Wiggy Wrote: In the beginning there was nothing.

0+0=0

Therefore there must be a creator outside of time and space. Simple really.

Not so simple; now you have to answer the question: where did that creator come from?
The answer is zero. You gotta carry the one and then subtract it.
Find
Reply
Thumpalumpacus Offline
Outside cat
*****
Religious Views: Alive in the Superunknown
Posts: 23024
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation: 106
#73
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 7:36 pm (This post was last modified: February 23, 2015 at 7:37 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 23, 2015 at 6:41 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:
(February 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: You really should change your title to "Feet to the Fire holder". I love the way you are dogged in your questions.
Done.

Now, I want someone to answer the damned question!

You should also send me a briefcase full of unmarked twenties and fifties.

[Image: 2mdfamh_th.jpg]

just testing.

Find
Reply
dyresand Offline
delete my account
****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation: 37
#74
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 7:49 pm
(February 21, 2015 at 2:35 am)xr34p3rx Wrote:
(February 21, 2015 at 2:08 am)Pizz-atheist Wrote: What argument are you talking about?

the argument where Christians pull a number out of their ass saying "what are the chances of a universe like this existing without a god" or something similar.

Lawrence Krauss said it best nothing is simply unstable and then something exists. Ill bring up a video.


Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Find
Reply
veoli Offline
Junior Member
**
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 139
Threads: 2
Joined: February 2, 2015
Reputation: 5
#75
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 9:15 pm
(February 21, 2015 at 9:01 pm)Wiggy Wrote: On the other hand evilutions are always changing their stories about fossils. Thats why its crap.

That's because the evidence is continuously being updated. New discoveries, new methods, new ways of thinking - the complete opposite of:

Quote:I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.

Taking a conclusion, then conforming everything to fit around that conclusion Dodgy
Find
Reply
The Valkyrie Offline
The last smile some will see...
*******
Religious Views: Time to end them
Posts: 35273
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation: 146
#76
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 9:20 pm
(February 21, 2015 at 12:55 am)xr34p3rx Wrote: This argument is a bit confusing to me at the moment. Could someone be kind enough to explain it a bit or give a video or link to an article breaking it down.

The best way to explain the argument is to say that creationists are stupid.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Find
Reply
dyresand Offline
delete my account
****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation: 37
#77
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 9:33 pm
(February 23, 2015 at 9:20 pm)Beccs Wrote:
(February 21, 2015 at 12:55 am)xr34p3rx Wrote: This argument is a bit confusing to me at the moment. Could someone be kind enough to explain it a bit or give a video or link to an article breaking it down.

The best way to explain the argument is to say that creationists are stupid.

[Image: 59525957.jpg]
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Find
Reply
Esquilax Offline
A Death Star for bad arguments.
*****
Religious Views: AF's own William Lane Craig
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation: 123
#78
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 9:38 pm
(February 23, 2015 at 9:15 pm)Helio Nimbus Wrote:
Quote:I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.

Taking a conclusion, then conforming everything to fit around that conclusion Dodgy

That's actually a feature of their manifesto:

Creation.com Wrote:By definition, therefore, no interpretation of facts in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

Gee, I wonder what their conclusions will be? Angel
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Find
Reply
abaris Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Religious Views: agnostic
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation: 55
#79
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 9:41 pm
Quote:I would suggest subscibing to creation.com. it completely and utterly destroys evolution scientifically.

Without bothering to get something as tiresome as peer review, I'm sure. And by peer review I don't mean other creationist tinfoilers but the actual scientific community.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Find
Reply
JesusHChrist Offline
Thunder Thighs
****
Religious Views: Christian Satanist
Posts: 2962
Threads: 44
Joined: March 22, 2013
Reputation: 39
#80
RE: The argument of "chance"
February 23, 2015 at 9:49 pm
"Scriptural record" - lol

Whose scripture? Why MINE of course.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
The argument of "chance"

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance. Nishant Xavier 55 4816 August 6, 2023 at 5:19 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  By chance? Yukon_Jack 438 52224 March 8, 2020 at 11:40 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  A chance to do good without god Baalzebutt 8 3614 February 27, 2013 at 4:26 pm
Last Post: Baalzebutt
  Products of Chance Reasonable_Jeff 44 14893 September 26, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: Darkstar
  Logic of chance Ephrium 59 21876 August 27, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Violet



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)