Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 9:58 am
Thread Rating:
|
Let me get this straight...
|
(October 9, 2015 at 4:08 pm)Drich Wrote: We had this discussion remember, this is what started the whole You pray 'whatever it takes, even if it means you get AIDS/Cancer, and I will do the same.' Which morphed into "Drich is praying everyone on the forum is to get cancer." Rather an interesting interpretation of my question; not to mention a revealing one into your recollection of events on record. Still, whatever gets you off at night I suppose. To sleep, that is. (October 9, 2015 at 4:08 pm)Drich Wrote: So to answer your question: They shouldn't. My experiences is what it took for me to go from faith to belief. I prayed that God show me the truth, and I was willing to do whatever it took.. The AIDS experience was the first step in that journey. because at the time it was a death sentence with no hope of recovery. This was the first time God took me well past any help any one could offer and set me right again. That process of being beyond the reach of any physical help anyone could offer leaves us at the point where we know that God himself will be the only thing that can bring us out of a given mess. Maybe not once or twice, but a lifetime of this tempers resolve and deepens understanding of God. Ok, so in terms of anyone else's position, your experiences are irrelevant; however important they are to you. Thus we can safely ignore them. Thank you.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
(October 9, 2015 at 4:09 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 9, 2015 at 3:27 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: No, it tends to get used for anti-gay assholes, regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof. I'm not a homophobe. I don't care if you suck dicks. Don't care at all. You consented to it so it's no big deal. RE: Let me get this straight...
October 9, 2015 at 7:29 pm
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2015 at 7:29 pm by robvalue.)
Choice 1: Learn real stuff
Pros: It helps inform your decisions to make the most sensible ones for yourself and those around you. It puts you in a position to help others with useful, correct information. You can even contribute towards the progression of science and technology. Your children will have you as a reliable, useful guide in their journey. You are less likely to be conned by people spinning tall tales. You can get a better job. You can make full use of your brain, and feel the satisfaction of coming to a good understanding of the world around you. Cons: It's difficult and time consuming. You must be comfortable with the boundaries of current knowledge. Choice 2: Make stuff up / believe stuff other people made up Pros: It's extremely fast. It requires no understanding of anything, no training, no testing, and if you encounter a problem you can just make more stuff up until you're satisfied you have it covered. You can "answer" every question. Cons: Your stuff is not based on reality. It will contain much which is either demonstrably wrong, or else unfalsifiable and therefor useless. It is worse than not knowing, because it can cause you to make poorer decisions than having no information. Since you fool yourself into thinking you have valid answers to everything, you have less incentive to actually learn anything real or useful. You will possibly confuse and misguide others, including your children. By using garbled thinking, you surrender your intellectual integrity, use litte introspection and will likely be completely unaware of just how broken your "answers" are. (October 9, 2015 at 6:46 pm)KUSA Wrote:(October 9, 2015 at 4:09 pm)Drich Wrote: So your calling KUSA a homophobe or again, does he get a pass on his comments because he does not believe in God? I know your not! I'm not the one who called you that. I corrected a Christian who called you a homophobe and one of your brother atheists. By saying only a Christian can be called a homophobe by saying what you said. RE: Let me get this straight...
October 11, 2015 at 12:38 pm
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2015 at 12:40 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
Again, Drippy is a troll. He twisted a story about a low white blood count and called it AIDS. Quite deceptive.
Drippy, you spit in the face of all people that really have the disease. Shame on you. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




