Posts: 67286
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:28 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 10:31 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Why invite the comments, Drich....why a review, if you have no intention of internalizing those responses you get? Obviously, this question is rhetorical. You can either improve your delivery, or accept your failure as satisfactory. Your call.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:41 am
Lol at Drich calling someone else a fool. You're courting hellfire, me old son.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 862
Threads: 51
Joined: May 14, 2014
Reputation:
11
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:43 am
(November 17, 2015 at 10:21 am)Drich Wrote: then your an fool.
Ha. Depends how you gauge it I suppose.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:47 am
(November 16, 2015 at 8:06 pm)Thena323 Wrote: (November 16, 2015 at 3:26 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm still waiting for drippy to demonstrate that his paul shit is inspired by some fucking god and not merely the heavily edited lunatic ravings of some ancient old fuckhead.
Guess I'll wait a long time, eh?
Well, you're probably the rocky soil that simply cannot be tilled. Drich chooses to not waste his time responding to questions posed by those who hearts are too hardened to accept seed...particularly if their questions are hard as well.
Or maybe he just hasn't gotten around to it.
at some point we have to shake the dust from our feet and move on. Not everyone want to be saved, like wise not everyone wants to have a conversation. When minnie is backed against Hard fact/something he does not want to hear he simply starts his arguement over and ignores everything that has already been said. I point to our discussion of the city of tyre. He pointed out that the city prophesy said would never be rebuilt still stands and posts a picture of the modern city through the ruins of the send incarnation/ second city with that name.
What I pointed out that both cities were built miles from the original city's site. a city that Alexander the great took down stone by stone to the bed rock and cast into the sea to build a causeway to the Island portion of that city. Which again fulfills prophesy to a tee. but because a new city was built miles away with the same name, he just rehashes his broken arguement.
this is just one of many examples of his 'debate style' I've enjoyed over the years. Every now and again I will directly answer something that is met with profanity or he just wont respond to. It seem to me he is just looking for oppertunities to comment from the balcony like statlor and waldorf.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statler_an...he_Balcony
And like Statlor and waldorf The rest of the muppet show doesn't really interact with them. Why? because they need to be seperate and apart from what is going on for their shtick to work. Minnie is just working a shtick, his in ablity to adapt to opposing facts proves this. Which again is fine, but at the same time I do not have to waist time directly helping him with his routine of one liners.
Posts: 67286
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:52 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 10:52 am by The Grand Nudger.)
When are you going to get around to shaking the dust off your feet and moving on Drich? Can we get an ETA on that?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:54 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 10:55 am by Drich.)
(November 17, 2015 at 10:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: Why invite the comments, Drich....why a review, if you have no intention of internalizing those responses you get? Obviously, this question is rhetorical. You can either improve your delivery, or accept your failure as satisfactory. Your call.
prove the delivery of what?
A charge was made that Christian promotes blood shed per the history of the RC church.
To which I said inorder for this to be true you need to provide something in the bible that support these acts. If you can't then it is really easy to identify these acts as non-christian.
Which again point to an abuse of power by wicked men in the church.
The existance of corrupt and wicked men in any institution does not mean the institution itself is corrupt. It just means the hearts of all men no matter how well meaning are still subject to corruption and evil when faced with great personal power.
Posts: 6610
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 4:31 pm
(November 17, 2015 at 10:41 am)Stimbo Wrote: Lol at Drich calling someone else a fool. You're courting hellfire, me old son.
Yeah, but that was Jesus who said it, not Paul. Who gives a fuck what Jesus said!
Posts: 240
Threads: 1
Joined: October 11, 2015
Reputation:
9
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 4:44 pm
(November 17, 2015 at 4:31 pm)Irrational Wrote: Yeah, but that was Jesus who said it, not Paul. Who gives a fuck what Jesus said!
I do :•)
Posts: 67286
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 4:56 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 4:57 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(November 17, 2015 at 10:54 am)Drich Wrote: (November 17, 2015 at 10:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: Why invite the comments, Drich....why a review, if you have no intention of internalizing those responses you get? Obviously, this question is rhetorical. You can either improve your delivery, or accept your failure as satisfactory. Your call.
prove the delivery of what?
A charge was made that Christian promotes blood shed per the history of the RC church.
To which I said inorder for this to be true you need to provide something in the bible that support these acts. If you can't then it is really easy to identify these acts as non-christian.
Which again point to an abuse of power by wicked men in the church.
The existance of corrupt and wicked men in any institution does not mean the institution itself is corrupt. It just means the hearts of all men no matter how well meaning are still subject to corruption and evil when faced with great personal power.
Really......really....? Do you want to read my comment again, that you quoted....... slowly, to see where you -might- have lost your shit?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 5:03 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 5:07 pm by Crossless2.0.)
(November 17, 2015 at 4:44 pm)Hmmm? Wrote: (November 17, 2015 at 4:31 pm)Irrational Wrote: Yeah, but that was Jesus who said it, not Paul. Who gives a fuck what Jesus said!
I do :•)
Great, another fucking evangelist busybody popping out of he sewer.
|