Posts: 23194
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 12:48 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2015 at 12:50 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 22, 2015 at 6:00 am)Napoléon Wrote: (November 21, 2015 at 1:49 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: First, no one is telling you to not criticize Islam that you should actually listen to. Secondly, if you lump 1.7 billion people together into one bracket, you're an idiot. Thirdly, not all Muslims are terrorists. If you need to be told that, you're stupider than you seem.
And I'm no do-gooder, I'm an asshole, so fuck off.
First, you're fucking dead wrong. How cute that you think you know what other people have said to me. I've been told numerous times, and been preached to numerous times, that Islam is a religion of peace, and that ISIS aren't Muslims, and that it's wrong to criticise Muslims. So do tell me more about how "no one is telling me not to criticise Islam". And your little qualifying addendum of "that you should listen to" is bollocks. Who are you, or anyone for that matter, to tell me who I should and should not listen to.
lol, first you ignore the qualification, and then you get butthurt over it? Jesus, dude, if someone is telling you bullshit -- anyone telling you to not criticize Islam is giving you a line of bullshit -- you shouldn't listen to them. Want to get mad at me for saying so? Have a field day, I don't give two shits rubbed together about your ires. But if you're stupid enough to listen to people you shouldn't listen to, you deserve all the angst you have.
(November 22, 2015 at 6:00 am)Napoléon Wrote: Second, no one is lumping 1.7 billion Muslims into one bracket and you're the fucking clown for suggesting so and moreover a disingenuous prick who clearly can't read the contents of the thread and instead just wants to mouth off to make himself feel intellectually superior.
My apologies, I should have made clear that I was using the general "you", not meaning you specifically.
As for your speculation about my motivations, I'm posting in this thread because I've got Muslim friends and a background of having lived in Muslim friends for five years, and quite frankly, I tire of Western presumptions that tar entire groups of people. If you don't like it, tough shit, kid.
(November 22, 2015 at 6:00 am)Napoléon Wrote: Fourthly, you're another do-gooder cunt who doesn't actually read anything anyone says, but just likes to offer his so brilliantly original opinion of "don't lump everyone together" and "not all Muslims are terrorists" even though the OP and nobody in this entire fucking thread said so. You really are a dipshit sometimes.
Oh, gosh, I've disappointed the Great Napoleon? Remind me again why I should care?
Listen: go back and reread my post (with my apology and correction from above in mind) and tell me what you think is wrong with the post itself -- not the projections you've filled this protest with.
It seems like you took some things in it awful personally, and you let your anger cloud your reading ability.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:02 pm
(November 21, 2015 at 3:41 pm)robvalue Wrote: I don't know how exactly someone can just announce to all Muslims that they are the new leader and that what they say about the Quran goes. The fact that people are busy slaughtering each other over different interpretations doesn't give me hope that they'll buy it. It will be more like who is left alive.
I volunteer to be "king of the Muslims". I have the advantage of not preferring any current muslim sect.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 12231
Threads: 324
Joined: April 14, 2011
Reputation:
140
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:06 pm
(November 22, 2015 at 12:48 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Listen: go back and reread my post (with my apology and correction from above in mind) and tell me what you think is wrong with the post itself -- not the projections you've filled this protest with.
It seems like you took some things in it awful personally, and you let your anger cloud your reading ability.
Oh the irony. When you actually make a point that's relevant I'll respond, all I've seen thus far are whines of "don't tar with the same brush", which is nothing more than a patronising dismissal of the actual points anyone else has made. So how about you address the OP and/or any of my actual posts, or you gtfo with this lame moral high ground seizing horse shite you're trying.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:07 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2015 at 1:07 pm by robvalue.)
DBP: I vote for you. How about a complete rewrite? Then it can actually say what people pretend it says.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:21 pm
(November 22, 2015 at 1:07 pm)robvalue Wrote: DBP: I vote for you. How about a complete rewrite? Then it can actually say what people pretend it says.
I can make shit like up with the best of them so why not!
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 23194
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:22 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2015 at 1:23 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 22, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Napoléon Wrote: (November 22, 2015 at 12:48 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Listen: go back and reread my post (with my apology and correction from above in mind) and tell me what you think is wrong with the post itself -- not the projections you've filled this protest with.
It seems like you took some things in it awful personally, and you let your anger cloud your reading ability.
Oh the irony. When you actually make a point that's relevant I'll respond, all I've seen thus far are whines of "don't tar with the same brush", which is nothing more than a patronising dismissal of the actual points anyone else has made. So how about you address the OP and/or any of my actual posts, or you gtfo with this lame moral high ground seizing horse shite you're trying.
Firstly, I'm not after moral highground. Like I've already acknowledged (and you're rediscovering), I'm an asshole.
As far as answering your OP, there really was very little of substance to it -- it was mainly a litany of Pew's results presented without context -- but here's what I think of the little bit of commentary you tucked away at the end.
(November 20, 2015 at 5:01 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Just thought it good material the next time we're told we shouldn't lump all muslims in the same bracket, or told we shouldn't criticize Islam for some bullshit PC reasoning, or some do-gooder moral highground humping tosh about how all muslims aren't terrorists.
Yes, because the Muslims you meet are statistics. I'm sure it's much easier to think of them this way than it is to treat them as, you know, individuals.
(November 20, 2015 at 5:01 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Stop letting these cunts use our own freedoms against us.
How do you propose to do that? What concrete actions do you suggest that would accomplish this end?
(November 20, 2015 at 5:01 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Quit relenting to the PC brigade who tell us we should show respect for this fucked up backward religion, and stop worrying about offending these muslims who insist they're not the majority.
Sounds good to me.
(November 20, 2015 at 5:01 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Fuck them and fuck their religion.
Fuck all religion.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:24 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2015 at 1:25 pm by robvalue.)
In fact, I suggest a schism. We should now have "peaceful Islam" and "Traditional Islam".
For those who want to join the peaceful sect, they should have no qualms about rewriting their materials to say what they obviously think God actually meant. All violent and oppressive bullshit is removed, and replaced with lots of nice peaceful stuff. People who are opposed to such reform can stay in "traditional Islam".
Then we can see who is all mouth and no trousers. Why would you lobby to keep in stuff that you constantly have to make excuses for?
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:25 pm
Quote:People who are opposed to such reform can stay in "traditional Islam".
It will break down when the traditionalists start throwing rocks at the heretics!
Posts: 23194
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 1:53 pm
(November 22, 2015 at 1:25 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:People who are opposed to such reform can stay in "traditional Islam".
It will break down when the traditionalists start throwing rocks at the heretics!
As was pointed out in the other thread, Islam won't be defanged until they undergo their own bloodletting so horrific people move to restrict its impact on civic life, just as happened with the 30 Years' War and Christianity.
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Muslims
November 22, 2015 at 8:35 pm
(November 21, 2015 at 4:12 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: [hide Wrote:Thumpalumpacus pid='1119978' dateline='1448132947']
I disagree. Middle Easterners have a proverb: Me and my brother against my cousin; me and my cousin against the world -- meaning that internecine struggle will stay that way so long as the outer world stays out of it. If the West intervened in a Muslim sectarian war, they would drop their fight with each other and band together to fight the Western incursion.
They won't cease terror attacks against us right away, but if there were a Muslim schismatic war, the attacks on the West would peter out, because in a war, you focus your power on your immediate enemy; you don't scatter your attacks, because you dissipate your own military power that way.
Look at it this way: Yemen is in the middle of a bloody civil war. When's the last time a terrorist plot against the West originated in Yemen?
Not necessarily. Some lessons must be searing in order to stick.
By this logic, there should also be Protestant terrorism.
I don't know that the process hasn't already started, but is simply under the radar right now.
Answer to the bold blue:
[hide]
Quote:That's what I'm saying, though. Christianity and Islam are not exactly the same, and won't react the same and have the same problems. The New Testament is not the same as the Koran, the same way that Jesus is not the same as Mohammad. Different religions, different cultures, different history, different ideologies, different traditions, and so and so on. I know you hate religion, but that does not mean all religions are the same. There's plenty of diversity, and not all religious people are going to act the same way, especially if they are from different religions. On the contrary, biblical Judaism and biblical Christianity are almost identical to Koran Islam except for a couple of very small details. All three are death cults. All three preach intolerance and death to anyone who doesn't toe the party line. All three have crazy-assed bigoted nutty deities who demand that their followers kiss their butts 24/7/365 or else get tossed into the fire. There's zero difference between them.
In the Old Testament if you don't suck up to the God character you get stoned to death.
In the New Testament if you don't suck up to the Jesus character he will toss your behind into the fire.
In the Koran if you don't suck up to the Allah character his minions will kill you.
Christians want Jesus to return to rule the world. They forget that the fairy tale says that he will be an intolerant prick who will rule with a rod of iron. It's obey or die. No freedom, no liberty, no thinking for yourself or doing what you want to do when you want to do it. He tortures everyone, destroys the environment, kills all life, destroys the planet.
Guess what? ISIS is working on that agenda. It's doing exactly what the Christians want the Jesus character to do. According to the biblical fairy tale a rational person would consider the Jesus character to be a prick. But the Jesus fanatics love him even though he's just like ISIS. It has to be proof of mental illness.
|