BLM Violent Hate Group

[BrokenQuill92]

[GrandizerII]

How you feel is no determinant of what is true. Unlike infowars.com, researchers usually test their hypotheses, and hence why we have a number of studies on modern racism.

Yeah, black people can be racist, particularly against other black people. But why ask anyway? Did you just want to feel better about yourself by being told by a leftist bastard like me that black people can be racist?

Wait, what?

But why ask anyway?

Because there are morons out there who genuinely believe blacks can't be racist and he was making sure you weren't one of them. Is he not allowed to ask you fucking questions now?

Look up internalized racism if you don't get it.

And as for your other point, context. Perhaps they're using a different definition of racism. But either way, so what? White privilege is real regardless.

[A Theist]

Wait, what?


Because there are morons out there who genuinely believe blacks can't be racist and he was making sure you weren't one of them. Is he not allowed to ask you fucking questions now?

 White privilege is real regardless.

Can you define that?

[Little lunch]

https://youtu.be/jQ_0bqWKO-k

Did you watch this A theist?
I'd like to hear your what you think and if it changed your mind a little.

[GrandizerII]

 White privilege is real regardless.

Can you define that?

I don't have to define it personally. Just Wikipedia it.

[CapnAwesome]

Can you define that?

I don't have to define it personally. Just Wikipedia it.

Lol. "I don't have to explain what I mean, wikipedia can tell you." Like white privileged is some universally agreed upon thing and the ultimate answer is on wikipedia of all places. This is probably my Atheist forums pet peeve. I'm pretty sure he wants to know what you mean by it. Not the editors of wikipedia.

[GrandizerII]

I don't have to define it personally. Just Wikipedia it.

Lol. "I don't have to explain what I mean, wikipedia can tell you." Like white privileged is some universally agreed upon thing and the ultimate answer is on wikipedia. This is probably my Atheist forums pet peeve.

It's going to be pretty much the same as what Wikipedia says. I read the article earlier. So if they want to know what definition I stick to, it's in there.

[RobertE]

[BrokenQuill92]

[CapnAwesome]

Lol. "I don't have to explain what I mean, wikipedia can tell you." Like white privileged is some universally agreed upon thing and the ultimate answer is on wikipedia. This is probably my Atheist forums pet peeve.

It's going to be pretty much the same as what Wikipedia says. I read the article earlier. So if they want to know what definition I stick to, it's in there.

The wikipedia article is very long, includes several different eras several different countries, white privledge as viewed by everything from Marxists to feminists to critiques of white privilege to deny it's existence. So you can't 'just read the what wikipedia says' since it gives different and sometimes contradictory points of view. Which is exactly what most wikipedia articles do and is the whole point of wikipedia.  What it doesn't do is give some magic, handy universal definition. You can't say 'I agree with wikipedia' Wikipedia doesn't agree with itself. It gives an overview of different points of view about it. That's why it's my pet peeve on here. You are basically telling someone else to do your research for you. You'd think that you would at least be able to narrow it down to the section that you agreed with.


By the way, this has nothing to do with my views on white privilege, which I think for sure exists and I wrote a bit about in the thread on white privilege.