Quote:And nothing about the difference between the two states?
I'm sure the answer is "goddidit" or some such nonsense.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 28, 2024, 3:31 am
Thread Rating:
|
Medical Hope for "Brain Dead"
|
 I'm sure the answer is "goddidit" or some such nonsense. 
I had expected Chad to know the meaning of "brain-dead", I guess.
You have far more faith in him then i do Thump
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb 
LastPoet
 Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm)  Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione (September 26, 2017 at 1:40 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I had expected Chad to know the meaning of "brain-dead", I guess. An erudite like Neo, tsk, equivocating such different states. Oh well, better try medicine school and fail, than to complete a theology course, IMHO. A brain dead person's brain and brain stemwill liquify to a mush after a couple of days. A vegetative person will not and there is brain activity. It is good news. 
You guys are kind of proving his point, to be honest...
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
LastPoet
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm) Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione (September 26, 2017 at 2:58 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You guys are kind of proving his point, to be honest... What point is that? No one mentioned religion here until he did, to bitch and moan about we being mean to him because he wanted so. All anyone ever done was pointing out his error confusing brain dead with vegetative state. How does that have anything to do with religion. Why do you think that we are proving his unexistent point?
What do you think his point is?
Quote:The treatment challenges a widely-accepted view that there is no prospect of a patient recovering consciousness if they have been in PVS for longer than 12 months. That science makes advances? I doubt it.
LastPoet
Leader of the gang of jerkoffs(tm) Religious Views: L'Uomo verrà portato dalla sua creazione (September 26, 2017 at 12:55 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Yeah. I learned, again, that some people on AF would rather criticize a theist than rejoice in a medical breakthrough. Time for you to man up. Up to this point in thread, where have you been criticized? I see Lutrinae correcting you. Is correcting you equal to critic? Just so I know. (September 26, 2017 at 3:02 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(September 26, 2017 at 2:58 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You guys are kind of proving his point, to be honest... (My bold) Yes, but it was done so with a snarky, condescending tone. I think if we're all being honest here we can admit that it wouldn't have been that type of tone if it had been someone else who had started this thread and made the error between brain dead and vegetable. And you're proving his point because even though he's already been corrected, this thread continues to be about him rather than about the topic at hand. Which is pretty much what he said.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)
