|
You can clone someone...
|
Historical figure, huh? Einstein.
As for a member of the forums, I guess I'd go with hammy. He's my only close friend on here. The bugle sounds as the charge begins
But on this battlefield no one wins - Iron Maiden, The Trooper
 (April 4, 2018 at 2:07 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: You have the ability to clone two people. Historical figure....? I have a dilemma .... Archimedes or Nikola Tesla....or maybe Marie Curie-Skłodowska??? Ok... Nikola Tesla won! I want Nikola here!!! And member of the forum, she said....hmm... interesting ..very interesting  I can clone you for fun ... you always make me smile ... I can clone each of you here because I feel good with you, but honestly, I would like to clone my best friend, but who?.... this is my sweet secret
"Alone is what I have. Alone protects me."
“I may be on the side of the angels but don’t think for one second that I am one of them.” “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existence. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery each day." 
Historical Figure: FDR
AF Member: Ivy's my best friend, but two of her would be too much awesome for the world to handle!   RE: You can clone someone...
April 5, 2018 at 10:40 pm
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2018 at 10:46 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(April 5, 2018 at 2:00 am)Lutrinae Wrote: Frodo. I miss the fun I had debating him. Lol I do too. It was always hilarious how he's the only theist I've ever met who outright says that his own belief is irrational and it's silly to expect belief in God to be reasonable, lol. The only real frustrating part was how no matter how many times I explained it he never understood that by my refusing to believe in God without evidence, it didn't imply that I was expecting to find evidence. He always thought that the fact that I believe God is unfalsifiable means I'm expecting there to be evidence for something that there can't be evidence for. Of course I'm not expecting there to be evidence for God. He never really got that when I ask for evidence, it's rhetorical, to prove a point that the theist can't do it. He was always like, "Well why do you ask for it then?"... he never understood just how silly it is to believe anything without evidence. There was a poster here that had a quote from fr0d0 in their sig, of fr0d0 literally saying "Belief in God is irrational", which is a direct quote from him lol. I forget who it is, but that poster may actually still have that quote in their sig, lol. I do love how fr0d0 at least owned the fact his belief was 100% faith-based and 0% rational, at least he was consistent on that. Unlike the cherry-picking self-contradictoriness that most theists display. It kind of reminded me of this quote from Kant: Immanuel Kant Wrote:I have therefore found it necessary to deny knowledge in order to make room for faith. ^ Any theist who truly 100% embraces this idea, that fr0d0 very much did, I'm going to think is 100% irrational and batshit nuts on this matter, but at least they get my respect for being less hypocritical and more consistent. I'd respect someone like MK more, for example, if he accepted something like this rather than convincing himself that there is proof of God when there just fucking isn't. If you're irrational, at least admit it. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
