Is Atheism Dead?

[Astreja]

Atheism was never alive, lol. Good to know that atheists are finally realizing it.

(bursts out laughing)  Klorophyll, as long as there is one atheist on Earth, atheism will continue to be a going concern.  Are you so really desperate to shore up your faith that you need to lie about what other people  do or do not believe?

[R00tKiT]

(bursts out laughing)  Klorophyll, as long as there is one atheist on Earth, atheism will continue to be a going concern.  Are you so really desperate to shore up your faith that you need to lie about what other people  do or do not believe?

I don't dispute the fact that atheists exist, lol. But atheism, as a position on religious beliefs, lost its charm a while ago. All the major proponents of atheism are epic failures. From Krauss equivocating on the word nothing, to Dawkins misunderstanding Aquinas's all Five ways.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-...uinas-fail

https://trisagionseraph.tripod.com/krauss.html

Do you agree with me, @Astreja, that Krauss is a dumbass when it comes to understanding the word nothing ?

[Nay_Sayer]

Atheism was never alive, lol. Good to know that atheists are finally realizing it.

(bursts out laughing)  Klorophyll, as long as there is one atheist on Earth, atheism will continue to be a going concern.  Are you so really desperate to shore up your faith that you need to lie about what other people  do or do not believe?

Kloro's entire posting history is a seemless string of lying.

[The Grand Nudger]

You're an advocate for atheism, Kloro..how do you think you've been doing....?

[Nay_Sayer]

(bursts out laughing)  Klorophyll, as long as there is one atheist on Earth, atheism will continue to be a going concern.  Are you so really desperate to shore up your faith that you need to lie about what other people  do or do not believe?

I don't dispute the fact that atheists exist, lol. But atheism, as a position on religious beliefs, lost its charm a while ago. All the major proponents of atheism are epic failures. From Krauss equivocating on the word nothing, to Dawkins misunderstanding Aquinas's all Five ways.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-...uinas-fail

https://trisagionseraph.tripod.com/krauss.html

Do you agree with me, @Astreja, that Krauss is a dumbass when it comes to understanding the word nothing ?

Conversely you don't understand, seemingly, anything.

[T.J.]

I haven't even heard of this book before today. Doesn't sound like anything I'd be interested in.

[R00tKiT]

Conversely you don't understand, seemingly, anything.

Go back to preaching your FSM light, Nay_sayer. That's a better use of your time than trying to defend Krauss butchering logic.

[The Architect Of Fate]

I don't dispute the fact that atheists exist, lol. But atheism, as a position on religious beliefs, lost its charm a while ago. All the major proponents of atheism are epic failures. From Krauss equivocating on the word nothing, to Dawkins misunderstanding Aquinas's all Five ways.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-...uinas-fail

https://trisagionseraph.tripod.com/krauss.html

Do you agree with me, @Astreja, that Krauss is a dumbass when it comes to understanding the word nothing ?

Yay, you cite two apologists hit pieces that totally miss the point of their arguments. Also, consider the fact the every major theist apologist has been an utter failure and no one has ever been able to provide a single good argument for god that has weathered any serious scrutiny or has provided and good defense against criticisms of theism. Also, neither Dawkins nor  Krauss defines atheism so pointing to them as if anything they have said reflects poorly on atheism demonstrates who have no clue what you're talking about.

You are an idiot 

---

Go back to preaching your FSM light, Nay_sayer. That's a better use of your time than trying to defend Krauss butchering logic.

How about you back to failing at physics that's a better use of your time than pretending you have made or could make a valid criticism of atheism 

[R00tKiT]

Yay, you cite two apologists hit pieces that totally miss the point of their arguments. Also, consider the fact the every major theist apologist has been an utter failure and no one has ever been able to provide a single good argument for god that has weathered any serious scrutiny or has provided and good defense against criticisms of theism. Also, neither Dawkins nor  Krauss defines atheism so pointing to them as if anything they have said reflects poorly on atheism demonstrates who have no clue what you're talking about.

You are an idiot 

Given your major grammar mistakes, you don't strike me as someone who read a lot about ((major theist apologists)). *sigh*

[The Architect Of Fate]

Given your major grammar mistakes, you don't strike me as someone who read a lot about ((major theist apologists)). *sigh*

1. Ad Hominem- Resorting to a personnel attack on my use of grammar is a weak comeback.

2. Non-Sequitur- It doesn't follow that my grammar mistakes equate to me not having read a lot about the major theist apologists. So this is a weak comeback.

Overall this just demonstrates why no one here takes you seriously