(October 11, 2016 at 10:47 am)Shell B Wrote: I'm no longer staff, and haven't been for a long time, but if someone is just saying someone's name repeatedly in a thread with no other content, it sounds like disruptive behavior. That doesn't mean she or he is a troll, but it's trolly.

As I said. I view it as child stomping feet behavior to get some attention. Provoke a reaction, preferably a negative one. The repetition makes it all the more ridiculous.

She's part of that generation where parents felt the need to bubble wrap their kids so their precious feelings wouldn't get hurt, instead of allowing them to build a backbone from being a little butthurt when they didn't win a softball or baseball game. Her generation was taught, win or lose, everyone gets a trophy.

Now they (the kids) walk around feeling entitled to step on people regardless of the damage caused. Why? Because of that damned bubble wrap bullshit. They just go back and cry to mommy and get a reassuring pat on the back instead of having to stand there and take their licks like an adult.

If you can't run with the big dogs, sweetheart, stay on the porch with the pups.

(October 11, 2016 at 4:58 am)Bella Morte Wrote: That time I took a short break? It wasn't ragequitting.

The fact that you quit just ten minutes after I hooked you good and well on your own bait ... that was just a coincidence?

You'd be regarded with the heft you obviously desire if you gave your own posts some heft. It's been a long time since you've brought anything but controversy to the table.

(October 11, 2016 at 1:47 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(October 11, 2016 at 4:58 am)Bella Morte Wrote: That time I took a short break? It wasn't ragequitting.

The fact that you quit just ten minutes after I hooked you good and well on your own bait ... that was just a coincidence?

You'd be regarded with the heft you obviously desire if you gave your own posts some heft. It's been a long time since you've brought anything but controversy to the table.

Yes, it was a coincidence. I had been thinking about a shortbreak long before that, but I would be lying if I said you didn't piss me off that day, but it still wasn't my reason for temporarily leaving. Now, it's clear my behaviour is upsetting some people here for some reason. So I would encourage the staff to discuss it behind the scenes so we can work this thing out.

(October 11, 2016 at 1:51 pm)Bella Morte Wrote:

(October 11, 2016 at 1:47 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The fact that you quit just ten minutes after I hooked you good and well on your own bait ... that was just a coincidence?

You'd be regarded with the heft you obviously desire if you gave your own posts some heft. It's been a long time since you've brought anything but controversy to the table.

Yes, it was a coincidence. I had been thinking about a shortbreak long before that, but I would be lying if I said you didn't piss me off that day, but it still wasn't my reason for temporarily leaving.

lol, okay.

(October 11, 2016 at 2:05 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(October 11, 2016 at 1:51 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: Yes, it was a coincidence. I had been thinking about a shortbreak long before that, but I would be lying if I said you didn't piss me off that day, but it still wasn't my reason for temporarily leaving.

lol, okay.

Believe what you want, Thump.

I really don't feel like arguing with you.

I'm laughing, not arguing.

(October 11, 2016 at 2:12 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I'm laughing, not arguing.

That's nice, glad you're happy!

(October 11, 2016 at 11:50 am)abaris Wrote:

(October 11, 2016 at 10:47 am)Shell B Wrote: I'm no longer staff, and haven't been for a long time, but if someone is just saying someone's name repeatedly in a thread with no other content, it sounds like disruptive behavior. That doesn't mean she or he is a troll, but it's trolly.

As I said. I view it as child stomping feet behavior to get some attention. Provoke a reaction, preferably a negative one. The repetition makes it all the more ridiculous.

Except when boobie is needed or poo to be removed, I notice my 2 month baby daughter does protest alot. She also favours the left boob of her mommy over the right boob. I see some political stances there. she does protest alot.

(October 11, 2016 at 3:08 pm)LastPoet Wrote:

(October 11, 2016 at 11:50 am)abaris Wrote: As I said. I view it as child stomping feet behavior to get some attention. Provoke a reaction, preferably a negative one. The repetition makes it all the more ridiculous.

Except when boobie is needed or poo to be removed, I notice my 2 month baby daughter does protest alot. She also favours the left boob of her mommy over the right boob. I see some political stances there. she does protest alot.

She's an anarcho-syndacalist. The left boobie shows the communistic tendencies, and the protesting the lack of respect for proper authority.