(April 5, 2018 at 10:10 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 10:06 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Can we talk about how interesting it is that she signed the contract? 😛

Sounds like she had a little fetish of her own.

Perhaps, but then again, she evidently got a hell of a lot more than she bargained for; I'm sure if there are BDSM people on this forum, they could explain that, even if she was into the prospect of an O-like lifestyle, Sparks crossed a lot of lines that shouldn't be crossed. Like it or not, in this case, the contract only has as much weight as the two people involved allow it to, because there's no way in Heaven, Hell, or Nevada that a sex slavery contract is legally binding (not since they passed the 13th Amendment).

They must have forgotten to discuss a safe word.


Amateurs. 😝

(April 5, 2018 at 10:06 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Can we talk about how interesting it is that she signed the contract? 😛

Wait is this just a BDSM thing or an actual abuse case? I'm confused now.

Because the whole BDSM sex "slave" thing is goddamn hot... I'm guessing this isn't like that though... from what I hear it's a case of a woman being abused by a repubicunt.

If it were just a BDSM thing then so fucking what?

---

(April 5, 2018 at 10:38 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 10:10 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Sounds like she had a little fetish of her own.

Perhaps, but then again, she evidently got a hell of a lot more than she bargained for; I'm sure if there are BDSM people on this forum, they could explain that, even if she was into the prospect of an O-like lifestyle, Sparks crossed a lot of lines that shouldn't be crossed. Like it or not, in this case, the contract only has as much weight as the two people involved allow it to, because there's no way in Heaven, Hell, or Nevada that a sex slavery contract is legally binding (not since they passed the 13th Amendment).

Well if lines were crossed then that's not acceptable and that is 100% abusive.

Also, you can't consent for future actions. There should always be a way to say "stop" or "no". You can't, say, agree to being fucked beforehand, and sign to agree that you're not allowed to change your mind later. Being able to say "stop" or "no" to sex at any point, is a basic human right. Doesn't fucking matter what you sign, there should always be a way out.

Pumpernickel . . .

triceratops . . .

Slovakia . . .

tapioca . . .

(April 5, 2018 at 10:42 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: They must have forgotten to discuss a safe word.  


Amateurs. 😝

Indeed.

Safe words are hot as fuck... and absolutely necessary if "no" or "stop" aren't going to be listened to.

Quote:As part of a five-page contract, a man allegedly declared his fiancée to be his “slave and property.”

In order to be legally enforceable a contract may not be for something which is illegal.

(April 5, 2018 at 11:54 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

Quote:As part of a five-page contract, a man allegedly declared his fiancée to be his “slave and property.”

In order to be legally enforceable a contract may not be for something which is illegal.

Yeah, and slavery hasn't been legal since December 1865, so that shit wouldn't be worth the toilet paper it's probably printed on.

Whatever consenting adults do blah blah blah...unless one's a Republican adviser, then it's just sick! 

especially if they are pandering to voters on moral issues they themselves do not respect

(April 5, 2018 at 9:18 pm)Jenny A Wrote:

(April 5, 2018 at 8:31 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: A good number of, perhaps even most, of the conservatives I know automatically assume all thieves, rapists and murderers and liberals so why not?

Because we already have insane levels on partisanship in this country.

No because whenever confronted by such a claim, I don't have a problem pointing out that the half dozen white people busted in New Hope last week for running a meth lab in the house with the rebel flag flying from the front porch probably didn't vote for Barak Obama.