Posts: 1402
Threads: 87
Joined: September 17, 2022
Reputation:
3
A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 28, 2026 at 2:07 pm
This thread is not going to be a form of toxic masculinity but it still has to do about being a male individual because as a general rule, we get to face and accept the rule of the strongest at a very early age. Before we become adults, as young male individuals we usually have to choose between:
a) Being smart (and avoiding open conflicts as most girls do)
b) Being egocentric and returning home with a black eye or worse at one point or another.
- But even in the school yard or whatever neighborhood you are in there are some rules. I’ve never seen 2 or more guys taking on one guy. I’ve also rarely seen a 10th grader taking on a 9th grader. This is considered cowardly for the 10 graders and stupid if it’s the 9th grader. There is this sense of inner justice and if this sense of inner justice is violated it is not uncommon to have an older “big-brother” or more senior student intervening to protect one or the other party and/or try to resolve the conflict in a more diplomatic manner.
So this is the schoolyard. Otherwise, historically there is always a code of honor in warfare (excepts for pirates and/or really archaic societies of the past). In the old days a night would place his sword when sleeping in the open air between him and a woman to show that the Lady’s honor has not been violated. In duels, two champions would face one another believing that God would eventually decide in favor of the more righteous party by letting the other party die. And this is not some sort of empty belief system. Even in the early 20th century you could be asked to choose a pistol from an open box if (for instance) you insulted an upper class gentlemen in one way or another. There were even legual codes for such duels in the 19th century.
And the Japanese are probably the masters of such martial rules. Although I believe that their society was very archaic before WWII, I know some stuff about their martial arts and writings. One very interesting book is the Hagakure by Uamamoto Tsunemoto and the Bushido by Inazo Nitobe.
So war and conflict has never been purely about who beats who and who gets all the good stuff by whatever way possible. This isn’t how it works even in more ancient societies.
From here I want to bring this debate to the Middle East. To my knowledge none of the major powers in the Middle East has ever fought what we call an asymmetric warfare. Again there were codes and strict rules in this part of the world too. When for instance a local noblemen called “The Efe” rode in the main street of his village or town everyone was supposed to make way or risk being trampled by him or his men. Of course there were also bands and/or bandits in remote places etc. who truly practiced “the rule of the strongest” without following any type of moral code but as I have said, these were bandits.
So what happened in the Middle East is that after WWII, the USSR actively supported all resistance groups in the Middle East who wanted to free themselves from European colonialism. Later this spirit of resistance spread to Palestine as well. Then, at some point, things like the Munich Massacre in October 1971 started happening. Someone simply decided that delivering any type of punch to your adversary was ok.
Now, If I had lived in that era this is where I would drive the line. Yes, people like Mao-Tse-Tung and Che Guevara even wrote books about asymmetric warfare and yes, the can be results (there has been results in Vietnam, Algeria and many other places) but when you start terrorizing by attacking whoever or whatever you are able to attack you become an entity without any sense of morality. So if you have no morality, what is it that you are fighting for in order to make the world a better place?
So there it is, the philosophical part of this thread.
And I want to extent this to Islam. I still know more Muslim people than all of the people in this forum combined. And I grant myself the freedom to say that there is no “Islamist group” or “Muslim extremist” or “Jihadi Group”. And there is no “Christian” such group either. I know next to nothing about Judaism but I don’t think there can be such thing in Judaism either. Christ is this divine or semi-divine figure whose philosophy does not match this kind of violence. And Islam, technically means that you take you sense of selfhood and surrender it to the Universe itself. So you cannot be a 100% ego-based being with a distorted philosophy who does purely evil things and pretend to be any of the above. That’s how I see it.
Also: I’m hearing that Ukraine is now cutting the route of Russian grain exports. Again: Where is our moral superiority? Would Vlodimir Zelensky want to win this war but starving people who need this grain shipments in other parts of the world?
So here is question number two. Personally: I’m ok with Ukraine bombing oil refineries in Russia. Let them feel the weight of this war I think they have deserved this much. But what about grain? Someday we will have to rebuild Russia. At that time we will need a Russia that is able to produce stuff that are other than fossil fuels and outdated weapons. Don’t you agree?
Posts: 51804
Threads: 564
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 28, 2026 at 6:32 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2026 at 6:33 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
Quote:And I grant myself the freedom to say that there is no “Islamist group” or “Muslim extremist” or “Jihadi Group”. And there is no “Christian” such group either. I know next to nothing about Judaism but I don’t think there can be such thing in Judaism either.
That is absolutely absurd. The history of the Abrahamic religions is one of (almost) never ending bloodshed against people who committed no crime other than believing the wrong things.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 68902
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 28, 2026 at 7:47 pm
I doubt there’s much point in giving you a history lesson about conflict by the evidence of conflict as opposed to the myths and legends later writers came up with to romanticize it.
I’ll focus instead on the issue at hand. Russian grain. Russia has been destroying and stealing ukranian grain for four years. A ukranian patriot would probably correct me to point out they’ve been doing it for centuries. Russia can rebuild itself, with its own shit. They should stop attacking Ukraine and start on that right now.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 18602
Threads: 154
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 28, 2026 at 8:23 pm
Girls avoid conflict? Have you ever known any girls?
And what the hell was question one?
And who exactly gives a flying damn that the Ukranians are disrupting anything to do with the Russians...it's FAFO for the Russians. They picked the wrong weakling to beat up on in their schoolyard.
What fresh hell can this be? - Dorothy Parker
Posts: 36011
Threads: 210
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 28, 2026 at 9:42 pm
Okay, this was like reading the bible.
Nonsense from beginning to end.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 68902
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 28, 2026 at 11:07 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2026 at 11:09 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I don't even understand the impetus for the thought. It's crazyland shit.
If we wanted to worry about the people who will need alot of help rebuilding their country when this war is over..because humanitarian philosophy.. it aint the russians........?
If we wanted to question the morality of targeting civilian infrastructure in a war with a mind to stop the aggressor from doing that....because decency....it aint the ukranians...?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 4953
Threads: 13
Joined: September 27, 2018
Reputation:
16
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 29, 2026 at 12:02 am
(This post was last modified: July 29, 2026 at 12:05 am by Belacqua.)
(July 28, 2026 at 2:07 pm)Leonardo17 Wrote: - But even in the school yard or whatever neighborhood you are in there are some rules. I’ve never seen 2 or more guys taking on one guy. I’ve also rarely seen a 10th grader taking on a 9th grader. This is considered cowardly for the 10 graders and stupid if it’s the 9th grader. There is this sense of inner justice and if this sense of inner justice is violated it is not uncommon to have an older “big-brother” or more senior student intervening to protect one or the other party and/or try to resolve the conflict in a more diplomatic manner.
Generally I think the rules that apply in a schoolyard or among kids in a neighborhood have to do with conformity enforcement.
Group conformity is VERY important to kids. Once it has been determined that an individual (another student or kid from the neighborhood) falls outside the acceptable range of conformity, then he becomes fair game. All of these self-contained groups include Self-Appointed Conformity Enforcers. They think that it is their right or even their duty to let the non-conformist know that he is unacceptable to them. They think they are doing a GOOD THING by teasing and insulting him until he learns to toe the line (or moves away, or commits suicide).
Maybe you've noticed that every time they re-boot the Spiderman franchise, they have to include a scene where Peter Parker stands up for a bullied kid and defies the Group Conformity Enforcers. Importantly, he does this BEFORE he gets his spider powers, and the scene lets us know that even without super powers he is a Good Person who defends people who are different against the Group Conformity Enforcers.
It's a perennial issue, though. Despite the clear message of every high school movie ever made, every enclosed group gets its clique of Group Conformity Enforcers, who think they are doing a good thing by being nasty to the people who, in their view, deserve nastiness. That's not going to change.
Quote:And the Japanese are probably the masters of such martial rules. Although I believe that their society was very archaic before WWII, I know some stuff about their martial arts and writings. One very interesting book is the Hagakure by Uamamoto Tsunemoto and the Bushido by Inazo Nitobe.
Here I think we have to be a little bit careful. Both of the books you mention were written long after the Samurai had lost their powers as a hereditary warrior class. The Samurai were converted to clerks and other less glamorous government functionaries. Inazo Nitobe wrote Bushido in English while living in America. It was first published in Philadelphia. So they may offer an attractive code for warriors, but they are a little like 19th century historical novelists writing about King Arthur's court. There's a lot of romanticizing going on.
Quote:So what happened in the Middle East is that after WWII, the USSR actively supported all resistance groups in the Middle East who wanted to free themselves from European colonialism. Later this spirit of resistance spread to Palestine as well. Then, at some point, things like the Munich Massacre in October 1971 started happening. Someone simply decided that delivering any type of punch to your adversary was ok.
There was a lot of stuff going on. Colonialist powers supported some groups and opposed others. Recently, for example, the US opposed Assad's government in Syria and replaced him with a high-level al Qaeda operative. So the colonialist powers are happy to support resistance groups when their goals temporarily align.
Also remember that the terrorist attacks in Palestine after the Balfour Declaration were carried out by extremist Zionist groups -- by definition colonialists. Palestinian groups replied in kind and pretty soon both sides were at it full time. The Munich attack was in retaliation for attacks on Palestinians -- which doesn't make it OK, but also means that we shouldn't see it as some kind of isolated unprovoked punch out of nowhere. Zionists had been delivering whatever kind of punch they could for decades before that point.
Quote:I know next to nothing about Judaism but I don’t think there can be such thing in Judaism either.
Sad to say, many Zionists justify extreme violence based on their religious beliefs. Their common use of the term "Amalek" to refer to any group that stands in their way is good evidence for this. Also the maps they often show of "Greater Israel," extending from the Nile to the Euphrates, is based on a promise that (according to the Hebrew Bible) God made to Abraham.
As for Ukraine, it has no claim to moral superiority. War is bad, all countries that want to keep this war going are bad.
Ukraine has lost half its population, its economy is shot to hell. Russia has all kinds of problems but they're not the ones who will have trouble rebuilding once NATO walks away and lets Ukraine fall to pieces.
Posts: 3351
Threads: 5
Joined: September 21, 2018
Reputation:
33
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 29, 2026 at 2:16 am
So much ignorance, in just two posts. Fucking unbelievable. How the fuck is if possible to be so ignorant at all!?
No extremist groups in Judaism? Has he never seen those guys in funny hats?
NATO leaving Ukraine in shambles? If it wasn't for nato countries, Ukraine would not exist anynore. NATO didn't invade Ukraine, NATO didn't try to succumb it for four years now.
Can't believe I have to fuckin say this, but bel and Leo are out of their fucking minds.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Posts: 4953
Threads: 13
Joined: September 27, 2018
Reputation:
16
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 29, 2026 at 5:48 am
(July 28, 2026 at 2:07 pm)Leonardo17 Wrote: I’m hearing that Ukraine is now cutting the route of Russian grain exports.
Nice photos today of Zelensky and Netanyahu smiling at each other in Washington.
Ukraine fired on an Iranian ship recently, so it's possible that Zelensky's masters are encouraging him to merge the two wars. I don't think it's wise for him to take on both Russia and Iran at the same time, but the whole plan isn't about doing what's best for Ukraine.
Posts: 20888
Threads: 482
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
31
RE: A Philosophy of War and Conflict
July 29, 2026 at 6:16 am
(July 29, 2026 at 2:16 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Can't believe I have to fuckin say this, but bel and Leo are out of their fucking minds.
At least you know that Russia is losing when Belacqua starts with his desperate accusations against Ukraine.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
|