Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 9, 2025, 10:38 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
-minus the sci...with added fi.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
Fifi? Isn't that a dog's name?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 7, 2014 at 7:26 am)Rhythm Wrote: -this is fucking idiotic. I implement computing systems in minecraft. I don't find myself having to revert a world simply because I simulate a machine within a simulation being run by a machine. You might be familiar with this sort of thing yourself - emulators (ATARI,NES,SEGA,PS running on a PC). The environment a sim runs in puts hard limits on what can be done or made by that system. I can arrange for an effect which might seem like it could break the machine (to a person with little to no fucking clue...). For example, running a simulated 128bit alu on my 64bit system.....with 4 instances of parallel implementation. Seems like it would be too much, how do you get 128bits out of 64...well, I don't..I use 32, the 128bit alu is a simulation (a useful illusion). Could, of course, run 16 of the machines pictured below to achieve the same effect. The manner in which it's achieved is fairly simple - though an explanation would probably only confuse the issue. Fair amount of trickery involved.

Quote:A future society will very likely have the technological ability and the motivation to create large numbers of completely realistic historical simulations and be able to overcome any ethical and legal obstacles to doing so. It is thus highly probable that we are a form of artificial intelligence inhabiting one of these simulations. To avoid stacking (i.e. simulations within simulations), the termination of these simulations is likely to be the point in history when the technology to create them first became widely available, (estimated to be 2050). Long range planning beyond this date would therefore be futile.

Historical Simulations - Motivational, Ethical and Legal Issues, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 23-42, August 2006
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 7, 2014 at 10:17 am)Heywood Wrote:
Quote:A future society will very likely have the technological ability and the motivation to create large numbers of completely realistic historical simulations and be able to overcome any ethical and legal obstacles to doing so. It is thus highly probable that we are a form of artificial intelligence inhabiting one of these simulations. To avoid stacking (i.e. simulations within simulations), the termination of these simulations is likely to be the point in history when the technology to create them first became widely available, (estimated to be 2050). Long range planning beyond this date would therefore be futile.

Historical Simulations - Motivational, Ethical and Legal Issues, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 23-42, August 2006

Perhaps lawyers aren't the very best place to get information about physics or future technology. Thinking What you have there is thought speculation about the legal implications of using computer simulations for medical testing working on the assumption that such simulations might be possible by 2050. Jenkins relies on futurologists for that prediction.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 6, 2014 at 11:18 pm)Heywood Wrote:
(December 6, 2014 at 8:19 pm)IATIA Wrote: Even if we could create a sub reality at the level portrayed in "The Thirteenth Floor", how would we even know?
Very smart people are working on how we could tell if we are existing in a sub reality right now. There are published paper detailing on how we can test for it.
It would be impossible to test a system from within the system. Any anomalies would be a part of the system that we were not yet aware of. Within the system one can only 'test' with the rules of the system.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(November 30, 2014 at 1:06 pm)oukoida Wrote: ...wouldn't it be much like a Minecraft world? Flat, infinite, with (potentially) infinite resources and without many of the dangers and complexities of the real world? Especially considering that the creator God is proposed (at least by the major monotheistic religions) as an omnipotent being, why would he create a universe where most of the space is empty and/or unsuitable for human life?

If he wanted a huge sandbox to make us humans live and to test us, why not make the whole of the universe like that? After all, he can pop things into existence, pretty much like a computer does when it generates a Minecraft world.

So, the question is: is Notch more intelligent a designer than Yahweh/Allah/Jehovah?

The answer is simple. It is tuned for life. How it happened is a topic we can debate.
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 7, 2014 at 2:41 pm)comet Wrote: It is tuned for life.

What on earth makes you say that?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 7, 2014 at 11:36 am)Jenny A Wrote:
(December 7, 2014 at 10:17 am)Heywood Wrote: Historical Simulations - Motivational, Ethical and Legal Issues, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 23-42, August 2006

Perhaps lawyers aren't the very best place to get information about physics or future technology. Thinking What you have there is thought speculation about the legal implications of using computer simulations for medical testing working on the assumption that such simulations might be possible by 2050. Jenkins relies on futurologists for that prediction.

I was just citing the source of my statement about stacking problems. I noticed this morning when I was putting up the link that Jenkins is from a law school. I almost commented on it but figured paper was peer reviewed prior to publication. I could be wrong about that too. I didn't spend any time researching the Journal of Futures Studies. I'm not interested in debating stacking problems with Rhythm....I just want to throw out there my source for that particular comment I made.

(December 7, 2014 at 2:07 pm)IATIA Wrote:
(December 6, 2014 at 11:18 pm)Heywood Wrote: Very smart people are working on how we could tell if we are existing in a sub reality right now. There are published paper detailing on how we can test for it.
It would be impossible to test a system from within the system. Any anomalies would be a part of the system that we were not yet aware of. Within the system one can only 'test' with the rules of the system.

Here is the source of my statement on people thinking about how to test Simulation Hypothesis.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/429...imulation/

(December 7, 2014 at 2:42 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:
(December 7, 2014 at 2:41 pm)comet Wrote: It is tuned for life.

What on earth makes you say that?

There are a lot of main stream physicists and cosmologists who acknowledge a "fine tuning" problem. However many do not.

It is not a crack pot idea.

Again I would dispute the notion the universe is fine tuned for life, but rather instead claim it is apparently fine tuned for emergent complexity.
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 7, 2014 at 2:42 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:
(December 7, 2014 at 2:41 pm)comet Wrote: It is tuned for life.

What on earth makes you say that?

Because this hole fits us perfectly; it must have been made to have us in it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
(December 7, 2014 at 3:21 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(December 7, 2014 at 2:42 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: What on earth makes you say that?

Because this hole fits us perfectly; it must have been made to have us in it.

This is not the kind of "fine tuning" we are talking about.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  We can only see 4% of the universe ! WinterHold 25 3670 January 30, 2019 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  God can make infinitely more special/valuable things than this universe blue grey brain 84 12439 December 17, 2018 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Exclamation Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, vaahaa 19 3516 September 18, 2017 at 1:46 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Carl Sagan: A Universe Not Made For Us Minimalist 28 8534 May 6, 2017 at 9:59 am
Last Post: Crunchy
  Is our universe more complex than a t-shirt or not? ReptilianPeon 17 4191 September 27, 2016 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  The universe existing as a byproduct of God? T.J. 89 11752 June 29, 2016 at 12:36 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 10433 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Why the fine tuning argument is a pile of shit Longhorn 61 13636 August 11, 2015 at 5:42 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  An eternal life is a worthless life. Lucanus 47 14276 December 24, 2014 at 5:11 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  How did god create the universe? Natachan 31 6647 November 12, 2014 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)