Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 12, 2024, 12:12 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The simple truth
#61
RE: The simple truth
(February 13, 2014 at 1:27 am)Esquilax Wrote: I always find these amusing, given that this same person will happily tell us about his god, who is uncreated and can exist in the nothingness before he created the universe- literally is sustained by nothing- without a hint of irony.

I hate it when I'm going through a thread with a response in my head to something absurd only to see that someone has beaten me to the punch.

Oh, well. Kudos to you.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#62
RE: The simple truth
Did you guys know that electrical impulses on nerves are weird?!
So, in case you've never noticed, our nerves are not simple copper wires.
Copper wires transport electrons along the metal's conduction band which works really well.
Nerves, on the other hand sort of lack in metal, so there's no conduction band for electrons to move.
What happens then is that in and around each nerve fiber you have ions... can't remember exactly which, but I think sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+)... and some others...
They're aligned along the nerve and, as one moves from the inside of the nerve to the outside, the ion next to it will also move to the outside, and the next, and the next, and so on until the last ion moves out, delivering its electrical signal to the next bunch of nerves...
The more ions that move at one particular location, the more intense is the "signal"...

bah... who am I kidding, let me look at the wiki... it knows...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_potential
[Image: 300px-Action_Potential.gif]
Reply
#63
RE: The simple truth
Right, nerve conduction is the diffusion of ions perpendicular to the axis of propagation not electrons parallel to that axis.
Kind of looks like what you'd expect if you had to co-opt an existing cell to do signal transport functions.
It is even less like what we generally consider 'electrical' signalling when you consider what happens at the places where nerves meet to communicate and calculate, the synapses. The signal is propagated there not by electrical activity at all but by the secretion of small molecules (neurotransmitters) which diffuse across the synaptic gap between cells and which alter the membrane permeability to the even smaller ions (Na+, K+) to kick off an impulse on the post synaptic cell.
Designed??? Only by an incompetent who likes slow, complicated and inefficient.

True, nerves are weird.
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat? Huh
Reply
#64
RE: The simple truth
(February 11, 2014 at 2:59 pm)The Good News Wrote: This is the gospel ("good news") of Jesus Christ. This is God's one and only plan of salvation. Please take time to read it, as your eternal destiny relies on how you will respond to it.


I don't know why my message has been labelled spam? If I handed you a book, which I had written, and told you it was what I believe would you simply label it spam?
Reply
#65
RE: The simple truth
(February 13, 2014 at 9:37 pm)The Good News Wrote:
(February 11, 2014 at 2:59 pm)The Good News Wrote: This is the gospel ("good news") of Jesus Christ. This is God's one and only plan of salvation. Please take time to read it, as your eternal destiny relies on how you will respond to it.


I don't know why my message has been labelled spam? If I handed you a book, which I had written, and told you it was what I believe would you simply label it spam?

Because you didn't write the vast majority of it. You copied it.

This is a discussion forum, not a place for ejaculating plagiarized sermons all over the walls. Acquaint yourself with our rules, particularly rule #1.
Reply
#66
RE: The simple truth
(February 11, 2014 at 10:16 pm)whateverist Wrote: Another nutter for sure. And shy. Didn't read it for the obvious reasons: shot through with scriptures, long winded and arrogant.

I'm sorry you feel my gospel message is arrogant. Though I haven't been the one on this thread who is mocking others and calling them names.

(February 13, 2014 at 1:27 am)Esquilax Wrote:
(February 11, 2014 at 5:29 pm)The Good News Wrote: The question is more to do with what is sustaining all things. Not just the heart. Since we know that it is impossible that nothing could be sustaining anything.

I always find these amusing, given that this same person will happily tell us about his god, who is uncreated and can exist in the nothingness before he created the universe- literally is sustained by nothing- without a hint of irony.

Well seeing as God is eternal and outside the realm of this universe it's not that strange. Or do you want to make the claim that the universe is eternal and self sustaining? Even though everything is dying around you? Including yourself.

(February 13, 2014 at 5:22 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:
(February 11, 2014 at 4:51 pm)The Good News Wrote: I can honestly say that I do not reject science. I believe science. I believe that within the universe things happen for particular reasons. I just don't believe that everything that claims to be science, is science.


Then you'd be right, but be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Perhaps you could define for us as laypersons, what does not constitute science.

(February 11, 2014 at 5:21 pm)Alex K Wrote: Odds are you know someone who has a pacemaker... For them I'd answer - yes indeed.

It's not magic just because the word "heart" is in it you know...

What?
[Image: zapupuje.jpg]

Is so!
[Image: y5enaruv.jpg]

Well, for example, evolutionists sometimes make the claim that evolution has been proved beyond any doubt. I'm talking about the sort of evolution where rocks become humans. So I don't consider that kind of evolution to be scientific fact. Also when someone makes the claim that there definitely is no God, and then gives "scientific proof" of this. Yet there is no science that can prove the non existence of God. As He exists apart from science; He is supernatural:

"As you do not know what is the way of the wind,
Or how the bones grow in the womb of her who is with child,
So you do not know the works of God who makes everything." (Ecc 11:5)

(February 11, 2014 at 5:41 pm)max-greece Wrote: TGN,

I am sure that in your delusions you think that eventually you'll get to God or Jesus as the driver for life.

Sadly you are 100% wrong. We know from your gospel that Jesus didn't have a clue about basic biology. The alimentary canal was completely beyond him - he showed no concept of the function of eating and he thought that the heart is where thoughts and morality came from. In short - he was a moron.

Here's a passage from Mark 7 - read it. Tell what it says about Jesus' knowledge of how biology works - note the complete lack of mention of the brain - anywhere in his diatribe:

14 Again Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen to me, everyone, and understand this. 15 Nothing outside a person can defile them by going into them. Rather, it is what comes out of a person that defiles them.” [16] [f]

17 After he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about this parable. 18 “Are you so dull?” he asked. “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? 19 For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)

20 He went on: “What comes out of a person is what defiles them. 21 For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality, theft, murder, 22 adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance and folly. 23 All these evils come from inside and defile a person.

I don't have to get to God. He is already with me.
Reply
#67
RE: The simple truth
(February 13, 2014 at 9:43 pm)The Good News Wrote: I'm talking about the sort of evolution where rocks become humans. So I don't consider that kind of evolution to be scientific fact.

Good, because neither do scientists.

You're thinking of the fantastical version of evolution that only exists in simple, creationist minds in which the world should be swarming with crocoducks. That's as phony as your god.

(Pro Tip: Try actually learning what science has to say before rejecting it in favor of magic sky wizards.)
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#68
RE: The simple truth
(February 13, 2014 at 10:28 pm)Faith No More Wrote:
(February 13, 2014 at 9:43 pm)The Good News Wrote: I'm talking about the sort of evolution where rocks become humans. So I don't consider that kind of evolution to be scientific fact.

Good, because neither do scientists.

You're thinking of the fantastical version of evolution that only exists in simple, creationist minds in which the world should be swarming with crocoducks. That's as phony as your god.

(Pro Tip: Try actually learning what science has to say before rejecting it in favor of magic sky wizards.)

I actually don't care how scientifically ignorant my statement was. I'm just glad you agree that evolution isn't a fact.

Can I ask you, is it possible that what I believe is true? Now I realise that you might see it as a billion to one chance, but all I ask is, is it possible?
Reply
#69
RE: The simple truth
(February 13, 2014 at 10:39 pm)The Good News Wrote: I actually don't care how scientifically ignorant my statement was. I'm just glad you agree that evolution isn't a fact.

I agreed that the evolution where rocks become humans isn't fact.

And of course you don't care about your scientific ignorance. You wouldn't be a creationist if you did.

(February 13, 2014 at 10:39 pm)The Good News Wrote: Can I ask you, is it possible that what I believe is true? Now I realise that you might see it as a billion to one chance, but all I ask is, is it possible?

Only in the sense that it is possible that I will wake up in the morning next to a naked Halle Berry giving me the winning lotto numbers for next week.

What you should ask is is it probable?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#70
RE: The simple truth
Oh, boy, if there's one thing I love, it's being preached at by a human of substandard intelligence.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Religion: Simple Lies for Simple People Minimalist 3 623 September 16, 2018 at 12:18 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Truth or swag? Angrboda 64 11888 June 4, 2018 at 3:08 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  A simple question for theists masterofpuppets 86 24018 April 10, 2017 at 11:12 am
Last Post: emjay
  A simple God question if I may. ignoramus 28 6398 February 17, 2017 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: Lek
  ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science) ProgrammingGodJordan 80 15364 January 13, 2017 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: ProgrammingGodJordan
  I was wrong about the simple choice. Mystic 42 6057 January 3, 2017 at 1:12 pm
Last Post: Asmodee
  It's a simple choice: Mystic 72 8481 December 31, 2016 at 3:12 pm
Last Post: Astreja
  Theists: would you view the truth? robvalue 154 21936 December 25, 2016 at 2:29 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  How to become a God, in 3 simple steps (absent faith/belief): ProgrammingGodJordan 91 17337 November 28, 2016 at 9:08 pm
Last Post: ProgrammingGodJordan
  Simple facts don't lie JBrentonK 78 15796 December 29, 2015 at 3:36 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)