Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 7:40 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Universe from Nothing?
#51
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 9, 2013 at 10:30 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: "...how things behave under certain conditions" is not the same thing as "how things behaved under a given condition." The kind of science we practice is fundamentally predictive in nature. "how things behave under certain conditions" is predictive generalization. It reflects inherent order in the universe.

Not really, it's just humans being able to spot a pattern. This is a stimulus/response thing: if X happens under A, B, and C conditions, Y results. If we don't change X, A, B or C, why would Y ever change?

You seem to be arguing that because stuff doesn't happen completely at random at every corner of space simultaneously, this is evidence of a designer. The problem is, you haven't yet shown that order is the exclusive domain of designers, nor that chaos is the basic state of reality at a universal scale. Every part of this objection is you begging the question.


Quote:How does subscribing to the B-theory allow the universe to exist any more than A-theory? Since you choose an a-temporal stance, the question must be rephrased for you:

"Why is there a universe, rather than nothing?"

Would you take an answer of "I don't know," as evidence for your god?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#52
RE: Universe from Nothing?
Thanks to everyone who has posted.
We've talked about a lot of different ideas -
but the central idea I'm trying to hear about
is the idea of the origin of the universe.

How did the universe that we observe come to be?
IF you think it arose from nothing, then how?
IF you think it arose from something - "" ""
IF you think that time inheres in existence,
then why is there something and not nothing?


If you have some other view of the origins of the universe,
please explain - WITHOUT invoking anything supernatural.


You and I are walking near the south pole.
We both come upon a fresh baked loaf of bread on a table.
The bread is still steaming in the tin.
I suggest that - only moments ago,
this loaf of bread must have been in a hot oven,
and that we are not alone - there is someone else here.
Neither of us can physically see any evidence of the oven or the person.

You respond, "No - I don't think it is fresh from an oven,
but rather that it arose long ago."

I say, "had it been on its own for more than five minutes
it would be frozen solid by now."

You say, "It gave rise to itself."

I say, "It's a loaf of bread - these things don't arise by themselves
anywhere else in human experience.
All the loaves of bread that we can actually see and measure
don't do what you are suggesting."

The universe is here - it is made up of particles and systems
which progress from order to disorder; it is breaking down.
It is a fresh baked universe.
It lacks the capacity for eternal existence.
Given time the Sun will swallow the earth,
the stars will fade from view, black holes will predominate,
matter will evaporate via Hawking radiation
leaving lone leptons that miss each other by one hundred million light years.

Why is there a universe?
What is it still doing here?
Why is there order?
Why is there anything for entropy to act upon?
The only situations where we can measure and document
order arising and persisting in the face of entropy
are where consciousness is present.
Reply
#53
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 9, 2013 at 10:30 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: "Why is there a universe, rather than nothing?"

Honestly? My pet 'hypothesis', for want of a better word, is that a universe is pretty much inevitable. I think it's a result of fluctuations in the quantum foam - akin the application of the non-linear schrodinger equation in relation to rogue waves. Basically, I get the feeling (and that's all it is, mind) that the universe is effectively a 'rogue wave' of virtual particles. I'm sure there are plenty of people on the forum that are capable of explaining to us both why my idea is absolute shite but hey, it makes sense given my limited understanding of things Big Grin
Reply
#54
RE: Universe from Nothing?
Quote:Not really, it's just humans being able to spot a pattern. This is a stimulus/response thing: if X happens under A, B, and C conditions, Y results. If we don't change X, A, B or C, why would Y ever change?

---This is not an accurate representation of the state of scientific theory. Special relativity is not merely descriptive; it is predictive - as are most of the more robust theories of modern science. It isn't much of a theory if it does not have predictive power. You are underselling science, in order to downplay the scripted-ness of the universe.

(November 9, 2013 at 11:11 pm)Optimistic Mysanthrope Wrote:
(November 9, 2013 at 10:30 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: "Why is there a universe, rather than nothing?"


Honestly? My pet 'hypothesis', for want of a better word, is that a universe is pretty much inevitable. I think it's a result of fluctuations in the quantum foam - akin the application of the non-linear schrodinger equation in relation to rogue waves. Basically, I get the feeling (and that's all it is, mind) that the universe is effectively a 'rogue wave' of virtual particles. I'm sure there are plenty of people on the forum that are capable of explaining to us both why my idea is absolute shite but hey, it makes sense given my limited understanding of things Big Grin


So what is the quantum foam doing here?
Reply
#55
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 9, 2013 at 10:40 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: I say, "It's a loaf of bread - these things don't arise by themselves
anywhere else in human experience.
All the loaves of bread that we can actually see and measure
don't do what you are suggesting."

This, right here. This is the part where your comparison to the universe breaks down.

You're right: loaves of bread have never arisen by themselves anywhere in human experience, and all the loaves of bread we have to compare to have been baked by human intervention. You're dead on correct, and we can see, measure and confirm this.

But what other universes have you been able to investigate? Where's this large succession of alternate realities that you've compared this one to, and more importantly, even if you had them, how would you be able to confirm that they were designed in order to make that comparison in the first place? Do you have a designer out there making universes in front of you, so you can confirm that?

Your analogy presents us with an object that we can compare and contrast with the natural world and other examples of it and thus of course we can determine its nature as a designed object. But you have no other universes to enact this same process on the other end of the comparison, and comparing the universe to things within it would be fallacious in the extreme. In a very real sense, it'd be comparing apples and oranges.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#56
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 9, 2013 at 11:15 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: ---This is not an accurate representation of the state of scientific theory. Special relativity is not merely descriptive; it is predictive - as are most of the more robust theories of modern science. It isn't much of a theory if it does not have predictive power. You are underselling science, in order to downplay the scripted-ness of the universe.

Yes, but they're predictive theories based upon data gathered through stimulus/response testing and experimentation. That's why we have a basis for them, and why we can confirm them. A theory conceived without the initial stimulus/response is just a guess.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#57
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 9, 2013 at 11:15 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: So what is the quantum foam doing here?

See Heisenburg's Uncertainty Principle. It can't not be there.
Reply
#58
RE: Universe from Nothing?
"Why is there a universe?
What is it still doing here?
Why is there order?
Why is there anything for entropy to act upon?"

None of these questions can be answered, but:

Looking at the size, age, complexity, structure and components of the universe only the most insane egotist would claim the reason for the universe has anything to do with a 200,000 year old descendent of a monkey.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
Reply
#59
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 6, 2013 at 11:31 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: ...but that we can tell the difference between the deliberate and the accidental.

[Image: THE-EARTHQUAKE-FLOWER-EYE.jpg]


If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
#60
RE: Universe from Nothing?
(November 9, 2013 at 10:30 pm)Jesus is Lord Wrote: "...how things behave under certain conditions" is not the same thing as "how things behaved under a given condition."

...Huh? Those are effectively stating the same thing. o.o

Quote:The kind of science we practice is fundamentally predictive in nature. "how things behave under certain conditions" is predictive generalization. It reflects inherent order in the universe.

A predictive generalization is just that: a generalization, an approximation of what happened, or will happen. It doesn't perfectly encapsulate the goings on, and much of quantum theory would indicate it isn't even possible to do so. Further, you tacitly admit that our 'laws of physics' are just descriptions of what happens. That things behave the way they do is a brute fact in all possible worlds. This would be true, even of God.

But all that is beside the point. I haven't contested that the universe is largely ordered, because that wasn't my criticism of your original post. You're making bare assertions and special pleading. If something that is ordered requires a higher power to imbue it with said order (which was your argument), then God cannot have order because by definition God is the Maximally Excellent Being; there can be no higher power than He.


Quote:You were one of the only people who actually tried to answer my original question - thank you for bringing up your answer again, and I apologize for skimming.

Eh, it's okay. Somtimes the conversations here go south in a way that seems dishonest to me at times.

Quote:How does subscribing to the B-theory allow the universe to exist any more than A-theory? Since you choose an a-temporal stance, the question must be rephrased for you:

"Why is there a universe, rather than nothing?"

Firstly, under the B-theory there can be no account of the origin of existence. In fact, I'm willing to affirm that talking about existence "beginning" is entirely nonsensical. It's not even possible to coherently talk about "nothingness", because you aren't talking about ANYTHING. It can't even be spoken of or referred to in, because it's either a contradictory concept or it resides at a linguistic limit. To paraphrase Wittgenstein: "The limits of my language are the limits of my world." I see no reason to think nothingness makes any sense at all, so it isn't really a question that can be meaningfully asked.

Quote:If we ascribe temporal dimensions to objects as though they were physical dimensions inherent to the object, then your view of the universe would require all things to have infinite temporal dimensions. How would you avoid this? It must be avoided, as all the finite elements of the universe that we can actually study do not have unlimited temporal dimensions.

Er, the B-theory does not ascribe infinite temporal dimensions to anything. Under the B-theory, there are at least 4 dimensions: [at least] 3 spatial dimensions and [at least] 1 temporal dimension. Objects are extended temporally, they don't have infinite temporal dimensions, anymore than they do spatial ones. All that the B-theory says is that objects pervade time as well, so that it can be said that both the past and the future exist as well (in contrast to the A-theory and presentism).
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  We can only see 4% of the universe ! WinterHold 25 3627 January 30, 2019 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  God can make infinitely more special/valuable things than this universe blue grey brain 84 12309 December 17, 2018 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What would you do if you found out that God has nothing to do with religions? Little Rik 68 13814 October 8, 2017 at 4:31 pm
Last Post: energizer bunny
  Carl Sagan: A Universe Not Made For Us Minimalist 28 8436 May 6, 2017 at 9:59 am
Last Post: Crunchy
  Is our universe more complex than a t-shirt or not? ReptilianPeon 17 4177 September 27, 2016 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  The universe existing as a byproduct of God? T.J. 89 11472 June 29, 2016 at 12:36 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 10235 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  If the universe was fine tuned for our life... Lucanus 262 58317 December 8, 2014 at 7:52 pm
Last Post: IATIA
  How did god create the universe? Natachan 31 6565 November 12, 2014 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  How did god create the universe? Freedom of thought 34 6433 April 20, 2014 at 12:59 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)